Review Exhibit 2.1: Typical State Court System.   

Assume that the higher on this chart the case is the more expensive it is for all parties.
                         

Write a memo on a state (not federal) level business dispute. Describe as if you were writing a "white paper" for your boss who wants to know how a case like the one you have chosen would be processed throughout the various legal phases in a state court system.
 

Because most cases never make it to trial, it is also important to consider alternative methods of dispute resolution. Suppose your selected case was initially submitted to ADR. What methods of ADR would be available to pursue? Which of these ADR methods do you think would be the most appropriate? Why?

Required elements:

• Discuss the differences in costs and benefits of going through traditional litigation and pursuing ADR in this case (Consider for example, why one of the parties in the case you're looking at may have preferred keeping the case out of court).
• Exhibit 2.1
•  

Transcribed Image Text:

A Typical State Court System Small-Claims Court Probate Court Supreme Court 5-9 Justices Intermediate Reviewing Court 3 Justices Intermediate General Jurisdiction Law Equity T INFERIOR TRIAL COURTS Criminal Courts Traffic Courts Municipal Courts Family Courts A Typical State Court System Small-Claims Court Probate Court Supreme Court 5-9 Justices Intermediate Reviewing Court 3 Justices Intermediate General Jurisdiction Law Equity T INFERIOR TRIAL COURTS Criminal Courts Traffic Courts Municipal Courts Family Courts

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Introduction The costs involved in the lawsuits taken to court are quite expensive for the parties involved Saunders 2019 The existence of several other alternatives that can enable the solving of the ... View the full answer