BETTER FORECASTING FOR LARGE CAPITAL PROJECTS Large capital investments that are completed on schedule and within...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
BETTER FORECASTING FOR LARGE CAPITAL PROJECTS Large capital investments that are completed on schedule and within their budgets are probably the exception rather than the rule-and even when completed many fail to meet expected revenues. Executives often blame project underperformance on foreseeable complexities and uncertainties having to do with the scope of and demand for the project, the technology or project location, or even stakeholder opposition. No doubt, all of these factors at one time or another contribute to cost overruns, benefit shortfalls, and delays. But knowing that such factors are likely to crop up, why do project planners, on average, fail to forecast their effect on the costs of complex projects? We've covered this territory before but continue to see companies making strategic decisions based on inaccurate data. Deliberately or not, costs are systematically underestimated, and benefits are overestimated during project preparation--because of delusions or honest mistakes on one hand and deceptions or strategic manipulation of information or processes on the other. As we'll explore, the former is often the result of underlying psychological biases and the latter of misplaced incentives and poor governance. Fortunately, corrective procedures to increase transparency and improve incentive systems can help ensure better forecasts. Most of the underestimation of costs and overestimation of benefits of capital projects is the result of people taking what's called an "inside view" of their forecasts. That is, they use typical bottom-up decision- making techniques, bringing to bear all they know about a problem, with special attention to its unique details-focusing tightly on a case at hand, considering a project plan and the obstacles to its completion, constructing scenarios of future progress, and extrapolating current trends. An inside view can lead to two cognitive delusions. The planning fallacy. Psychologists have defined the planning fallacy as the tendency of people to underestimate task-completion times and costs even when they know that the vast majority of similar tasks have run late or gone over budget. In its grip, managers make decisions based on delusional optimism rather than on a rational weighting of gains, losses, and probabilities-involuntarily spinning scenarios of success and overlooking the potential for mistakes and miscalculations. Anchoring and adjustment. This heuristic rule of thumb is another consequence of inside-view thinking that leads to overoptimistic forecasts. Anchoring, one of the most robust biases of judgment, occurs because the answer to a question is subconsciously affected by the first cost or budget numbers considered. In the context of planning for a large capital project, for example, there is always an initial plan that unavoidably becomes an anchor for later-stage estimates, which never sufficiently adjust to the reality of the project's performance. In fact, the typical initial estimate for the most complex and large capital investments is less than half the final cost-as managers further underestimate the cost of completing construction at every subsequent stage of the process-even though project champions almost always see their initial plan as the best or most likely case. To ensure responsibility, companies should also place the financial risk of delay and cost overruns with the contractors who bid on portions of the project. This mitigates the likelihood of the winning bidder turning out to be the one who most underestimates the true costs, with the expectation that the initial low price will be compensated for through overpricing as the scope increases. When compensation is not possible, there is less chance that the bidding price is artificially low. If bidders instead bear financial penalties for cost overruns or for being late, then they have incentive to disclose information that they wouldn't otherwise have shared. In our experience, even these minimal incentives are often not in place. 1.3 In light of the case study provided, critically discuss your understanding of cost overruns and suggest strategies that organisations can consider in mitigating against cost overruns. (10 marks) BETTER FORECASTING FOR LARGE CAPITAL PROJECTS Large capital investments that are completed on schedule and within their budgets are probably the exception rather than the rule-and even when completed many fail to meet expected revenues. Executives often blame project underperformance on foreseeable complexities and uncertainties having to do with the scope of and demand for the project, the technology or project location, or even stakeholder opposition. No doubt, all of these factors at one time or another contribute to cost overruns, benefit shortfalls, and delays. But knowing that such factors are likely to crop up, why do project planners, on average, fail to forecast their effect on the costs of complex projects? We've covered this territory before but continue to see companies making strategic decisions based on inaccurate data. Deliberately or not, costs are systematically underestimated, and benefits are overestimated during project preparation--because of delusions or honest mistakes on one hand and deceptions or strategic manipulation of information or processes on the other. As we'll explore, the former is often the result of underlying psychological biases and the latter of misplaced incentives and poor governance. Fortunately, corrective procedures to increase transparency and improve incentive systems can help ensure better forecasts. Most of the underestimation of costs and overestimation of benefits of capital projects is the result of people taking what's called an "inside view" of their forecasts. That is, they use typical bottom-up decision- making techniques, bringing to bear all they know about a problem, with special attention to its unique details-focusing tightly on a case at hand, considering a project plan and the obstacles to its completion, constructing scenarios of future progress, and extrapolating current trends. An inside view can lead to two cognitive delusions. The planning fallacy. Psychologists have defined the planning fallacy as the tendency of people to underestimate task-completion times and costs even when they know that the vast majority of similar tasks have run late or gone over budget. In its grip, managers make decisions based on delusional optimism rather than on a rational weighting of gains, losses, and probabilities-involuntarily spinning scenarios of success and overlooking the potential for mistakes and miscalculations. Anchoring and adjustment. This heuristic rule of thumb is another consequence of inside-view thinking that leads to overoptimistic forecasts. Anchoring, one of the most robust biases of judgment, occurs because the answer to a question is subconsciously affected by the first cost or budget numbers considered. In the context of planning for a large capital project, for example, there is always an initial plan that unavoidably becomes an anchor for later-stage estimates, which never sufficiently adjust to the reality of the project's performance. In fact, the typical initial estimate for the most complex and large capital investments is less than half the final cost-as managers further underestimate the cost of completing construction at every subsequent stage of the process-even though project champions almost always see their initial plan as the best or most likely case. To ensure responsibility, companies should also place the financial risk of delay and cost overruns with the contractors who bid on portions of the project. This mitigates the likelihood of the winning bidder turning out to be the one who most underestimates the true costs, with the expectation that the initial low price will be compensated for through overpricing as the scope increases. When compensation is not possible, there is less chance that the bidding price is artificially low. If bidders instead bear financial penalties for cost overruns or for being late, then they have incentive to disclose information that they wouldn't otherwise have shared. In our experience, even these minimal incentives are often not in place. 1.3 In light of the case study provided, critically discuss your understanding of cost overruns and suggest strategies that organisations can consider in mitigating against cost overruns. (10 marks)
Expert Answer:
Related Book For
Principles of Information Systems
ISBN: 978-0324665284
9th edition
Authors: Ralph M. Stair, George W. Reynolds
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these general management questions
-
Planning is one of the most important management functions in any business. A front office managers first step in planning should involve determine the departments goals. Planning also includes...
-
Managing Scope Changes Case Study Scope changes on a project can occur regardless of how well the project is planned or executed. Scope changes can be the result of something that was omitted during...
-
Passenger table (passengerid, address etc.) Flight table (flight id, departure, destination, depDate) Booking table (cID, fid, date, cost) a. Find Passengers who live in Chicago b. Total number of...
-
A microphone is attached to a spring that is suspended from the ceiling, as the drawing indicates. Directly below on the floor is a stationary 440-Hz source of sound. The microphone vibrates up and...
-
Scalar Manufacturing produces automobile parts in batches in one continuous manufacturing process. The company uses direct labour hours to assign overhead to each part. Magda, the financial...
-
A system in which mass as well as energy can not be exchanged with the surroundings is called (a) Open system (b) Closed system (c) Isolated system (d) None of these.
-
Grande Stores is a large discount catalog department store chain. The company has recently expanded from 6 to 43 stores by borrowing from several large financial institutions and from a public...
-
a)Provide an example of a Cross Site Scripting (XSS) attack. Include an explanation of the differences between stored and reflective XSS attacks. b)Provide an example of a SQL Injection attack. Why...
-
Summarize the article Survival or failure within the organizational life cycle. What are the lessons for managers?
-
1. As a Marketing Manager with responsibility for staff, describe three (3) issues that you see as most likely to create boundary-spanning problems for employees in a customer call center at your...
-
The technology company, Samsung, is considering to revamp an old tablet product of theirs and would like for it to make a big impression against other competitors in this day and age. -What branding...
-
How do strategic leaders leverage data-driven insights and emerging technologies to anticipate market trends and capitalize on strategic opportunities in a rapidly evolving landscape?
-
Prepare the schedule of cost of goods manufactured for Barton Company using the following information for the year ended December 31. Direct materials used Direct labor Factory overhead Work in...
-
If a firm has fixed costs of $66000 a variable cost per unit of $3 and sales price per unit of $17 what is the firm break-even point in units?
-
This assignment involves finding the least cost combination of components to use in an electrical circuit to TV desired output voltage specific Question. The circuit for the assignment is attached....
-
General Electric Capital, a division of General Electric, uses long-term debt extensively. In a recent year, GE Capital issued $11 billion in long-term debt to investors, then within days filed legal...
-
Assume that you must take a computer-programming course next semester. What language do you think would be best for you to study? Why? Do you think that a professional programmer needs to know more...
-
What is a Web browser? Provide two examples.
-
Assume that you work for an insurance company. Describe three applications that are critical to your business. What tools would you use to develop applications?
-
What is meant by a cap and floor?
-
What is the impact on interest rate risk of including a cap and/or floor in the coupon structure?
-
The pricing expression for a risky floater can be thought of as possessing two components. Explain.
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App