A man from British Columbia, Aaron, recently sued Gillette, alleging that he was injured by a defective razor. He stated that the razor handle snapped as he was shaving his face, which injured his face and caused a large gash that required stitches. Aaron claimed that he had endured permanent scarring and sought damages, including $100 000 in anticipated treatments. Gillette denied any wrongdoing. Soon after the trial began, the judge made several rulings against Aaron, who was self-represented. Aaron later agreed to drop his claim in response to Gillette’s offer to waive legal costs against him (estimated at about $30 000) if she did so. According to the Globe and Mail, Aaron’s sister stated as follows: “We spent $21 000 on lawyers and experts, but we have no regrets. Now we know how justice works. Now we are much wiser.”

In three paragraphs answer: Why do you think this matter proceeded to litigation? Assume that there is mandatory court mediation before trial. What are the risks Gillette faced from proceeding with the litigation? What are Aaron’s risks? What side do you favour and why? Base your response (even why you favour a side) on material from the readings and not just your opinion.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The matter proceeded to litigation because there was a dispute between ... View the full answer