create a bar graph for the following scario

"Study 2: Leadership Development Programs on Team Performance

The study by Xiao et al. (2022) aimed to investigate the impact of leadership development programs on team performance. They formulated two hypotheses: a null hypothesis (H0) suggesting no significant relationship between participation in leadership development programs and team performance, and an alternative hypothesis (Ha) proposing that teams with leaders who underwent development programs would exhibit higher performance compared to those led by untrained leaders (Halina, 2022). To test these hypotheses, the researchers employed a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical test, with the test statistic resulting in F=3.25 and a p-value of 0.021 (Xiao et al., 2022). The significant level was set at 0.05.

The study's findings supported the alternative hypothesis (Ha), indicating that teams with trained leaders achieved significantly higher performance scores than those with untrained leaders. This outcome suggests that investing in leadership development programs can positively impact team performance by enhancing leadership skills and decision-making abilities. The researchers also highlighted the importance of the large sample size (n=300 teams), which enhanced the generalizability of the finders. Furthermore, the low p-value signifies a diminished risk of Type I error, bolstering confidence in the statistical significance of the observed relationship.

The statistical test used in this study, one-way ANOVA, was valuable for comparing multiple groups and means and exploring potential variations in the impact of leadership training on different types of teams or leadership styles (Chatzi & Doody, 2023). The F-statistic of 3.25 indicated a statistically significant difference in performance means between teams with trained leaders and those with untrained leaders (Xiao et al., 2022). However, it is crucial to consider the variance within each group and the potential presence of outliers or specific contextual factors that might affect the results. This implies that additional research could explore these subtleties in greater depth, aiming to offer a more exhaustive comprehension of the connection between leadership development and team performance."