Do it with accurate answers and refrences, DIRECTION: Analyze the case below and answer the question below.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Do it with accurate answers and refrences,
Transcribed Image Text:
DIRECTION: Analyze the case below and answer the question below. Use all applicable Philippine environmental laws. SCENARIO: In the case of People of the Philippines vs. Santiago del Mar Holdings LLC vs. Local Government of Rizal vs. DENR vs. Joel Pagatpatan, Sammy Bingil, and Raymond Bagandino, the following facts of the case are hereby set, such that, 1) Mr. Pablo Ramirez ventured a large cave system in the Municipality of Rizal with a long-time colleague and geologist Mr. Sammy Bingil in July 2015. The two found out that the cave system is a landmark biodiversity hotspot with 150 endangered endemic species protected by Philippine Laws. It was also found that the waters running along the cave floor and walls are black, had a nasty smell similar to burnt tires and rusty iron nails, and is acidic Their findings was reported to the LGU Rizal through Mr. Joel Pagatpatan, the MENRO Officer, 2) The MENRO Office reported the findings to then-Municipal Mayor Ramon Bagandino, who later ordered a thorough investigation in October 2015. The investigation report by Mr. Pagatpatan was kept in his office for safekeeping: 3) Three years later, a typhoid epidemic hit the Municipality of Rizal with a death toll of 4,500. An investigation was then initiated by orders of now Mayor Pagatpatan and Vice Mayor Bagandino and it was found that the local groundwater was sourced from the springs that sprouted from the cave that Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Bingil found in 2015. Fearing the possibility of public backlash and administrative case, Mayor Pagatpatan bumed the hard copy of the 2015 Investigation Report, unaware that an electronic copy was sent to the DENR-EMB Regional Office by his assistant in 2017; 4) With the epidemic going viral, the Regional EMB Office launched an investigation into Mayor Pagatpatan and Vice Mayor Bagandino using the archived electronic copy of the 2015 Investigation Report as justifiable cause. The two officials were then arrested awaiting trial 5) During the trial, it was found that the pollution of the groundwater from the cave system, first seen by Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Bingil in 2015, was due to an illegal wastewater pump from the Santiago del Mar Holdings LLC, a tire and metal company 2 km from the cave entrance, 6) During the last trial, it was found that Santiago del Mar Holdings LLC was already convicted of another illegal waste dumping in 2010 and 2013 and was sentenced with a permanent cease and desist order to operate by the Manila Regional Trial Court. It was also found that the company obtained a Permit to Operate from the Municipality of Rizal by then-Mayor Bagandino under the recommendations of then-MENRO Officer Mr. Pagatpatan. Moreover, an ECC Permit was given to the company by then DENR-EMB Regional Office in 2014, with records showing that the permit was given by Mr. Bingil, then OIC- RD Appointee, with the signed ECC application but no technical review report or any related report found, 7) Due to the grievous consequences of the case, the Manila RTC passed the guilty sentenced to all respondents, guilty of all charges related to environmental laws, and sentenced each a fine of 500,000 pesos and 10 years. imprisonment with no parole. The respondents appealed the case in the Court of Appeals, which was later denied. The Supreme Court heard the case in 2019 and re-affirmed the decision of the Manila RTC and Court of Appeals finding the respondents guilty of all charges and issued a permanent injunction to the respondents with dismissal from public service with no titled benefits. QUESTION: In your capacity as a professional lawyer/environmentalist/geologist, find out what charges were the respondents guilty of related environmental laws by citing it together with its appropriate penalties. Do you agree with the Manila RTC's rulings? Elaborate your stand. PHILIPPINE ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS Link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/153fJCoR76LLdsPbkJsn3hNRVO8OGSJtu?usp=sharing 1. Republic Act No. 9003 - Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 2. Republic Act No. 6969 - Toxic Substances and Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes Control Act of 1990 3. Republic Act No. 9275 - Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004 4. Republic Act No. 8749 - Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999 5. Republic Act No. 9729 - Climate Change Act of 2009 6. Republic Act No. 10121 - Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010 7. Republic Act No. 9072 - National Caves and Cave Resources Management and Protection Act of 2001 8. Republic Act No. 7586 - National Integrated Protected Areas System Act of 1992 9. Presidential Decree No. 984 - The Pollution Control Law of 1976 10. Presidential Decree No. 1586 Establishing an Environmental Impact Statement System including Other Environmental Management Related Measures and for Other Purposes DIRECTION: Analyze the case below and answer the question below. Use all applicable Philippine environmental laws. SCENARIO: In the case of People of the Philippines vs. Santiago del Mar Holdings LLC vs. Local Government of Rizal vs. DENR vs. Joel Pagatpatan, Sammy Bingil, and Raymond Bagandino, the following facts of the case are hereby set, such that, 1) Mr. Pablo Ramirez ventured a large cave system in the Municipality of Rizal with a long-time colleague and geologist Mr. Sammy Bingil in July 2015. The two found out that the cave system is a landmark biodiversity hotspot with 150 endangered endemic species protected by Philippine Laws. It was also found that the waters running along the cave floor and walls are black, had a nasty smell similar to burnt tires and rusty iron nails, and is acidic Their findings was reported to the LGU Rizal through Mr. Joel Pagatpatan, the MENRO Officer, 2) The MENRO Office reported the findings to then-Municipal Mayor Ramon Bagandino, who later ordered a thorough investigation in October 2015. The investigation report by Mr. Pagatpatan was kept in his office for safekeeping: 3) Three years later, a typhoid epidemic hit the Municipality of Rizal with a death toll of 4,500. An investigation was then initiated by orders of now Mayor Pagatpatan and Vice Mayor Bagandino and it was found that the local groundwater was sourced from the springs that sprouted from the cave that Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Bingil found in 2015. Fearing the possibility of public backlash and administrative case, Mayor Pagatpatan bumed the hard copy of the 2015 Investigation Report, unaware that an electronic copy was sent to the DENR-EMB Regional Office by his assistant in 2017; 4) With the epidemic going viral, the Regional EMB Office launched an investigation into Mayor Pagatpatan and Vice Mayor Bagandino using the archived electronic copy of the 2015 Investigation Report as justifiable cause. The two officials were then arrested awaiting trial 5) During the trial, it was found that the pollution of the groundwater from the cave system, first seen by Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Bingil in 2015, was due to an illegal wastewater pump from the Santiago del Mar Holdings LLC, a tire and metal company 2 km from the cave entrance, 6) During the last trial, it was found that Santiago del Mar Holdings LLC was already convicted of another illegal waste dumping in 2010 and 2013 and was sentenced with a permanent cease and desist order to operate by the Manila Regional Trial Court. It was also found that the company obtained a Permit to Operate from the Municipality of Rizal by then-Mayor Bagandino under the recommendations of then-MENRO Officer Mr. Pagatpatan. Moreover, an ECC Permit was given to the company by then DENR-EMB Regional Office in 2014, with records showing that the permit was given by Mr. Bingil, then OIC- RD Appointee, with the signed ECC application but no technical review report or any related report found, 7) Due to the grievous consequences of the case, the Manila RTC passed the guilty sentenced to all respondents, guilty of all charges related to environmental laws, and sentenced each a fine of 500,000 pesos and 10 years. imprisonment with no parole. The respondents appealed the case in the Court of Appeals, which was later denied. The Supreme Court heard the case in 2019 and re-affirmed the decision of the Manila RTC and Court of Appeals finding the respondents guilty of all charges and issued a permanent injunction to the respondents with dismissal from public service with no titled benefits. QUESTION: In your capacity as a professional lawyer/environmentalist/geologist, find out what charges were the respondents guilty of related environmental laws by citing it together with its appropriate penalties. Do you agree with the Manila RTC's rulings? Elaborate your stand. PHILIPPINE ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS Link: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/153fJCoR76LLdsPbkJsn3hNRVO8OGSJtu?usp=sharing 1. Republic Act No. 9003 - Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 2. Republic Act No. 6969 - Toxic Substances and Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes Control Act of 1990 3. Republic Act No. 9275 - Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004 4. Republic Act No. 8749 - Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999 5. Republic Act No. 9729 - Climate Change Act of 2009 6. Republic Act No. 10121 - Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010 7. Republic Act No. 9072 - National Caves and Cave Resources Management and Protection Act of 2001 8. Republic Act No. 7586 - National Integrated Protected Areas System Act of 1992 9. Presidential Decree No. 984 - The Pollution Control Law of 1976 10. Presidential Decree No. 1586 Establishing an Environmental Impact Statement System including Other Environmental Management Related Measures and for Other Purposes
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
The respondents in the case are guilty of violating several Philippine environmental laws Violation of Republic Act No 9275 Philippine Clean Water Act ... View the full answer
Related Book For
International Business Law And Its Environment
ISBN: 9781305972599
10th Edition
Authors: Richard Schaffer, Filiberto Agusti, Lucien J. Dhooge
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
Managing Scope Changes Case Study Scope changes on a project can occur regardless of how well the project is planned or executed. Scope changes can be the result of something that was omitted during...
-
Read the article below and answer the questions posed, the compose response should be two to three pages in length. 1. What are 2 major planning failures pre-event at Memorial that led to it becoming...
-
What were the worst mistakes made by Globestelle during the production development process ? CASE 15 Case date 2001 The Reltex Project Nigel Slack Globestelle is the world's largest precision...
-
What ethical implications arise from urban renewal efforts such as those in Harlem?
-
On a hike with his family, 5-year-old Ryan became frightened when he reached a very steep section of the trail. His father gently helped him climb up while saying, "Can you be brave? Being brave is...
-
You have been given the following estimates of free cash flow from your company and have no reason to doubt them. The cash flows will not grow at this pace indefinitely and you are likely to be...
-
1. What types of documentation are needed for this application? 2. During application development, what steps should the IT staff follow to develop a structure chart? 3. What suggestions do you have...
-
Critically evaluate different ethical frameworks and their applicability to H&M group working methods (operationally and culturally). You are required to apply recognised theory within your...
-
Prepare a journal entry to accrue for the estimated warranty costs for the November and December sales at December 3 1 , 2 0 2 4. Carla Vista Inc. began selling game consoles on November 1 , 2 0 2 4...
-
1. Consider an employee management system that stores information regarding the employee ID, name, address, contact numbers, date of birth and age. Each employee can have more than one contact...
-
You are required to implement the design of a "11011" Sequence Detector using Logic gates and JK Flip-flops and implement the circuit in any Simulator. a. b. C. d. Define overlap and non-overlap in...
-
. For a constant clockwise angular velocity of link m of w= 2 rad/s, examine the difference in the path generated by point A at the bottom of the mechanism (i.e. the "foot") as a function of two...
-
A 2.4 KVA, 2400/240 V 50 Hz step down transformer has the following parameters R = 1.52, X = 2.52, R2 = 0.022, X =0.032, Rc1 = 6k, Xm1 8 = It is operating at 80% of its rated load at 0.8 power factor...
-
HOW MANY UNITS MICROSOFT HAVE TO SELL TO MAKE 2X AS MUCH PROFIT THEY MADE LAST YEAR & HOW MUCH MICROSOFT WOULD MAKE IF THEY UP THE SELLING PRICE TO $25 (MICROSOFT OFFICE: 69.99/YEAR) (ITEM: MICROSOFT...
-
A variable interest entity (VIE) is a structure frequently used for off-balance sheet financing. VIEs have become quite numerous in recent years and have been the subject of some controversy....
-
What are multinational corporations (MNCs) and what economic roles do they play?
-
A precision grinding machine (Fig. 3.53) is supported on an isolator that has a stiffness of \(1 \mathrm{MN} / \mathrm{m}\) and a viscous damping constant of \(1 \mathrm{kN}-\mathrm{s} /...
-
Derive the equation of motion and find the steady-state response of the system shown in Fig. 3.54 for rotational motion about the hinge \(O\) for the following data: \(k=5000 \mathrm{~N} /...
-
An air compressor of mass \(100 \mathrm{~kg}\) is mounted on an elastic foundation. It has been observed that, when a harmonic force of amplitude \(100 \mathrm{~N}\) is applied to the compressor, the...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App