Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler used absorption costing to make themselves look more profitable, researchers say....
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler used "absorption costing to make themselves look more profitable, researchers say. But the practice can be costly, and other companies may want to think twice before they follow suit. Marielle Segarra Follow on Google+ It's no secret that in the years leading up to 2008, the Big Three automakers - Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler-were producing above market demand. But researchers say they know why the automakers did it, and they are warning other companies to avoid the same temptation. To boost profits and keep up with short-term incentives, the automakers used an accounting trick, overproducing while "absorption costing, according to professors from Michigan State University who wrote a study on the topic that was recognized this January for its contribution to accounting by the American Institute of CPAs and other groups. Ultimately, the practice hurt the automakers, tacking on advertising and inventory holding costs and possibly causing a decline in brand image, the researchers say. From 2005 to 2006, long before GM and Chrysler filed for bankruptcy and appealed for federal aid, the automakers had abundant excess capacity. They could make more cars with their resources than consumers were willing to buy. They also had high fixed costs, including leases on factories and labor contracts that prevented them from laying off workers when demand was low, says Karen Sedatole, associate professor of accounting at MSU and a co-author of the study. To take advantage of these factors, the Big Three produced above market demand while using absorption costing - a technique that allows companies to calculate the cost of making a product by dividing total costs by the total number of products made, Sedatole says. Using this method, the cars the automakers made "absorbed" all manufacturing costs, including the cost of paying rent on idle factories. Because this method considers all fixed costs as part of the cost of goods sold, it gives companies an incentive to spread that cost among more products to make the cost-per-product appear lower. If this company has excess capacity, produces all the products it can, and sells up to demand, its cost of goods sold will be lower than it would if the company had only produced up to demand. This lower cost boosts profits on the income statement. Instead of writing off the cost of these idle plants as an expense, companies shift it to the balance sheet as inventory. Say fixed costs for a given factory are $100, and that the factory can make 50 cars. Consumers, however, demand only 10. Under absorption costing, if the company makes all 50 cars, its cost-per-car is $2. If it makes only up to demand, or 10 cars, the cost-per- car is $10. Although each car adds variable costs for steel and other parts, if those costs are low, the company still has an incentive to make more cars to keep the cost-per-car down. If the company makes all go cars but can only sell 10, its cost of goods sold will appear on its income statement as 10 cars at $2 per car, or $20, plus variable costs. The cost of making the other cars will land on the balance sheet as ending inventory. If, on the other hand, the company makes just 10 cars, its whole overhead cost of $100 will fall on its income statement, raising its cost of goods sold and lowering profits. Companies that overproduce to avoid the latter scenario "are, in a way, managing earnings upward by trapping costs on the balance sheet as inventory, so they won't hit the income statement," Sedatole says. Absorption costing is legal. FASB Statement 151 allows companies to use the practice for "normal" excess capacity and to expense "abnormal" excess capacity. But it doesn't clearly define what's normal, leaving room for companies to overproduce in order to lower unit cost. But business leaders should think twice before letting this accounting method influence their production decisions, Sedatole says. Even though they can make their companies appear more profitable in the short term by concealing excess capacity costs on the balance sheet, holding so much excess inventory could be costly, she says. "When [the automakers] couldn't sell the cars, they would sit on the lot. They'd have to go in and replace the tires, and there were costs associated with that," Sedatole says. The companies also had to pay to advertise their cars, often at discounted prices. And by making their cars cheaper and more readily available, they may have turned off potential customers, she adds. "If you see a $12,000 car in a TV ad is being auctioned off for $6,000 at your local dealer, that affects your image of that vehicle," says Sedatole. This effect on brand image is difficult to quantify, but the researchers correlated 1% of rebate with a 2% decline in appeal in the J.D. Power Automotive Performance Execution and Layout (APEAL) Index. The Central Lesson Some might argue that it's good strategy for a company already obligated to pay rent and salaries on its factories to make products up to its capacity. "An economist would say as long as I could sell the car for more than its variable cost, I'm better off selling it," Sedatole says. But "that's a very, very short-term way of thinking," because it neglects the costs that come with having a high volume of excess inventory. The central lesson? Companies shouldn't use their financial-reporting methods to make internal decisions, says Ranjani Krishnan, MSU professor of accounting and a co-author of the study. "The objective of financial accounting is to provide information for stakeholders that are external to the company," Krishnan says. "But that is not adequate from the perspective of internal decision- makers. Managerial accounting needs to focus on the best way to provide information that will lead to strategic economic decisions." Using absorption costing to monitor efficiency can lead companies to make poor production decisions, Krishnan says. A company that does this could seem to be growing less efficient when demand decreases. If a factory makes fewer cars this year than last year, for instance, its cost-per-car will look higher, and it may then overproduce in order to present itself more favorably to shareholders, consumers, and analysts. Instead, Krishnan suggests, companies should write off the cost of excess capacity as an expense on their internal income statements, a practice that may help give them perspective. Another way to avoid overproduction: companies can change the way they pay executives. Like many companies, the automakers put their managers under pressure to deliver in the short term by structuring executive-compensation incentives around metrics like labor hours-per-vehicle, which the auto industry's Harbour Report uses to compare companies. With fixed labor hours, the only way to look more efficient under this measure is to produce more cars. "A lot of this behavior was frankly driven by greed," Krishnan says. "If you look at the type of managerial incentives they had during the time of our study, the executive committee deliberations, it was all about meeting short-term quarterly traffic numbers or meeting analysts forecasts so that they could get their bonuses." Instead, companies "have to look at performance from a more holistic perspective, and not just look at financial numbers like net margin or profit, or return on investment, but also at things like customer satisfaction or brand image, things which may be a little bit more difficult to measure because they're not as quantifiable." Sedatole and Krishnan co-authored the study with Alexander Brüggen, an associate professor at Maastricht University in the Netherlands. For the questions in this section, read "Why the Big Three Put Too Many Cars on the Lot" by Marielle Segarra. 1. What is absorption costing, according to Professor Sedatole? (5 points) 2.. What incentive does absorption costing provide to companies (especially automakers with high fixed costs and excess production capacity)? (5 points) 3. What benefits did inventory overproduction provide to automakers? (5 points) 4. How did overproducing inventory hurt automakers? (5 points) 5. Consider the following simplified example. Ford has quarterly fixed costs of $1,200,000 and expected sales of 100 units. Variable costs are $15,000 per unit. If Ford produces and sells 100 units during the quarter, what is the total cost per unit sold? (3 points) 6.. Using the same example from #18 above, if Ford produces 200 units and sells 100 units During the quarter, what is the total cost per unit sold? Explain why your answer is different from your answer in #18. (5 points) Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler used "absorption costing to make themselves look more profitable, researchers say. But the practice can be costly, and other companies may want to think twice before they follow suit. Marielle Segarra Follow on Google+ It's no secret that in the years leading up to 2008, the Big Three automakers - Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler-were producing above market demand. But researchers say they know why the automakers did it, and they are warning other companies to avoid the same temptation. To boost profits and keep up with short-term incentives, the automakers used an accounting trick, overproducing while "absorption costing, according to professors from Michigan State University who wrote a study on the topic that was recognized this January for its contribution to accounting by the American Institute of CPAs and other groups. Ultimately, the practice hurt the automakers, tacking on advertising and inventory holding costs and possibly causing a decline in brand image, the researchers say. From 2005 to 2006, long before GM and Chrysler filed for bankruptcy and appealed for federal aid, the automakers had abundant excess capacity. They could make more cars with their resources than consumers were willing to buy. They also had high fixed costs, including leases on factories and labor contracts that prevented them from laying off workers when demand was low, says Karen Sedatole, associate professor of accounting at MSU and a co-author of the study. To take advantage of these factors, the Big Three produced above market demand while using absorption costing - a technique that allows companies to calculate the cost of making a product by dividing total costs by the total number of products made, Sedatole says. Using this method, the cars the automakers made "absorbed" all manufacturing costs, including the cost of paying rent on idle factories. Because this method considers all fixed costs as part of the cost of goods sold, it gives companies an incentive to spread that cost among more products to make the cost-per-product appear lower. If this company has excess capacity, produces all the products it can, and sells up to demand, its cost of goods sold will be lower than it would if the company had only produced up to demand. This lower cost boosts profits on the income statement. Instead of writing off the cost of these idle plants as an expense, companies shift it to the balance sheet as inventory. Say fixed costs for a given factory are $100, and that the factory can make 50 cars. Consumers, however, demand only 10. Under absorption costing, if the company makes all 50 cars, its cost-per-car is $2. If it makes only up to demand, or 10 cars, the cost-per- car is $10. Although each car adds variable costs for steel and other parts, if those costs are low, the company still has an incentive to make more cars to keep the cost-per-car down. If the company makes all go cars but can only sell 10, its cost of goods sold will appear on its income statement as 10 cars at $2 per car, or $20, plus variable costs. The cost of making the other cars will land on the balance sheet as ending inventory. If, on the other hand, the company makes just 10 cars, its whole overhead cost of $100 will fall on its income statement, raising its cost of goods sold and lowering profits. Companies that overproduce to avoid the latter scenario "are, in a way, managing earnings upward by trapping costs on the balance sheet as inventory, so they won't hit the income statement," Sedatole says. Absorption costing is legal. FASB Statement 151 allows companies to use the practice for "normal" excess capacity and to expense "abnormal" excess capacity. But it doesn't clearly define what's normal, leaving room for companies to overproduce in order to lower unit cost. But business leaders should think twice before letting this accounting method influence their production decisions, Sedatole says. Even though they can make their companies appear more profitable in the short term by concealing excess capacity costs on the balance sheet, holding so much excess inventory could be costly, she says. "When [the automakers] couldn't sell the cars, they would sit on the lot. They'd have to go in and replace the tires, and there were costs associated with that," Sedatole says. The companies also had to pay to advertise their cars, often at discounted prices. And by making their cars cheaper and more readily available, they may have turned off potential customers, she adds. "If you see a $12,000 car in a TV ad is being auctioned off for $6,000 at your local dealer, that affects your image of that vehicle," says Sedatole. This effect on brand image is difficult to quantify, but the researchers correlated 1% of rebate with a 2% decline in appeal in the J.D. Power Automotive Performance Execution and Layout (APEAL) Index. The Central Lesson Some might argue that it's good strategy for a company already obligated to pay rent and salaries on its factories to make products up to its capacity. "An economist would say as long as I could sell the car for more than its variable cost, I'm better off selling it," Sedatole says. But "that's a very, very short-term way of thinking," because it neglects the costs that come with having a high volume of excess inventory. The central lesson? Companies shouldn't use their financial-reporting methods to make internal decisions, says Ranjani Krishnan, MSU professor of accounting and a co-author of the study. "The objective of financial accounting is to provide information for stakeholders that are external to the company," Krishnan says. "But that is not adequate from the perspective of internal decision- makers. Managerial accounting needs to focus on the best way to provide information that will lead to strategic economic decisions." Using absorption costing to monitor efficiency can lead companies to make poor production decisions, Krishnan says. A company that does this could seem to be growing less efficient when demand decreases. If a factory makes fewer cars this year than last year, for instance, its cost-per-car will look higher, and it may then overproduce in order to present itself more favorably to shareholders, consumers, and analysts. Instead, Krishnan suggests, companies should write off the cost of excess capacity as an expense on their internal income statements, a practice that may help give them perspective. Another way to avoid overproduction: companies can change the way they pay executives. Like many companies, the automakers put their managers under pressure to deliver in the short term by structuring executive-compensation incentives around metrics like labor hours-per-vehicle, which the auto industry's Harbour Report uses to compare companies. With fixed labor hours, the only way to look more efficient under this measure is to produce more cars. "A lot of this behavior was frankly driven by greed," Krishnan says. "If you look at the type of managerial incentives they had during the time of our study, the executive committee deliberations, it was all about meeting short-term quarterly traffic numbers or meeting analysts forecasts so that they could get their bonuses." Instead, companies "have to look at performance from a more holistic perspective, and not just look at financial numbers like net margin or profit, or return on investment, but also at things like customer satisfaction or brand image, things which may be a little bit more difficult to measure because they're not as quantifiable." Sedatole and Krishnan co-authored the study with Alexander Brüggen, an associate professor at Maastricht University in the Netherlands. For the questions in this section, read "Why the Big Three Put Too Many Cars on the Lot" by Marielle Segarra. 1. What is absorption costing, according to Professor Sedatole? (5 points) 2.. What incentive does absorption costing provide to companies (especially automakers with high fixed costs and excess production capacity)? (5 points) 3. What benefits did inventory overproduction provide to automakers? (5 points) 4. How did overproducing inventory hurt automakers? (5 points) 5. Consider the following simplified example. Ford has quarterly fixed costs of $1,200,000 and expected sales of 100 units. Variable costs are $15,000 per unit. If Ford produces and sells 100 units during the quarter, what is the total cost per unit sold? (3 points) 6.. Using the same example from #18 above, if Ford produces 200 units and sells 100 units During the quarter, what is the total cost per unit sold? Explain why your answer is different from your answer in #18. (5 points)
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
1According to Professor Sedatole absorption costing is a method of accounting that assigns all of the fixed and variable manufacturing costs to the pr... View the full answer
Related Book For
Business
ISBN: 978-0133354263
8th Canadian Edition
Authors: Ricky Griffin, Ronald J.Ebert, Frederick Starke, Melanie Lang, George Dracopoulos
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
Planning is one of the most important management functions in any business. A front office managers first step in planning should involve determine the departments goals. Planning also includes...
-
The Crazy Eddie fraud may appear smaller and gentler than the massive billion-dollar frauds exposed in recent times, such as Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme, frauds in the subprime mortgage market, the...
-
Read the case study "Southwest Airlines," found in Part 2 of your textbook. Review the "Guide to Case Analysis" found on pp. CA1 - CA11 of your textbook. (This guide follows the last case in the...
-
(1 point) Solve each equation for x: (A) Solve 4(x+4) = 8 for x. X = 1 (B) Solve In x + ln(x 4) = 2 for x. X =
-
The PERT chart formulation given above is somewhat unnatural. It would be more natural for vertices to represent jobs and edges to represent sequencing constraints; that is, edge (u, v) would...
-
A thin vertical copper plate is subjected to a uniform heat flux of 1000 W/m 2 on one side, while the other side is exposed to ambient surrounding at 5°C. The surface of the plate is oxidized...
-
Westphal Company's variable selling and administra- tive expenses are 15% of net sales. Fixed expenses are \($60,000\) per quarter. The sales budget shows expected sales of \($200,000\) and...
-
The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo, Inc. Instructions Go to the books companion website and use information found there to answer the following questions related to The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo,...
-
ParticularsProduct YSales Quantity for 2021 (in Units): January580 February430 March540Selling Price per unit ($) for 2021710Targets for first Quarter of 2022 Sales Quantity increase (%)15% Sales...
-
In the 2018 General Social Survey (GSS), 2,344 respondents answered the question, How many children have you ever had? The results were a. Is the variable, number of children, categorical or...
-
Write down the difference between Zoho and Zimbra.
-
If an internal auditing organization undertakes an external review every three years, is the expense of internal reviews warranted?
-
Enterprise management and the board are concerned with how well the internal auditing department performs the role actually assigned to it. Thus, the second step of the external review is to compare...
-
An external review should be relevant to the particular internal auditing department being evaluated. To that end, the first step in such a review is to compare the department's charter with the...
-
Small droplets of carbon tetrachloride at \(68^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) are formed with a spray nozzle. If the average diameter of the droplets is \(200 \mu \mathrm{m}\), what is the difference in...
-
Why can audit supervision be regarded as a form of quality control?
-
. Question 12 of 20 > 153 View Policies Current Attempt in Progress The T-accounts for Equipment and the related Accumulated Depreciation-Equipment for Blue Spruce Company at the end of 2022 are ...
-
True & False The basis of an asset must be reduced by the depreciation allowable, 2. Adjusted gross income (AGI) is the basis for a number of phase-outs of deductions. 3. A change to adjusted gross...
-
Using the fishbone diagram in Figure 12.2 as a guide, analyze the various ways quality at Fraberts can be managed.
-
What kinds of changes in banking are shifting banks away from their historical role?
-
Give two examples (other than those in this chapter) for each of the major types of business application programs.
-
Dominiques Frozen Food Company makes frozen dinners and sells them to retail outlets near London. Dominique has just inherited 10,000 and has decided to invest it in the business. She is trying to...
-
Bastille Corporation produces two grades of wine from grapes that it buys from California growers. It produces and sells roughly 3,000,000 liters per year of a low-cost, high-volume product called...
-
Metro Hospital has been under pressure to keep costs down. Indeed, the hospital administrator has been managing various revenue-producing centres to maximize contributions to the recovery of the...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App