General Motors:Its Changing Organizations Design The trials and tribulations of General Motors (GM) during the 1980s...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
General Motors:Its Changing Organizations Design The trials and tribulations of General Motors (GM) during the 1980s and 1990s mirror those of organizations in the United States and around the world. GM's position of market leader in automobile production and sales began to falter in the early 1980s along with market leaders in other industries. Competitive forces throughout the world were forcing US firms to rethink their strategies and their organization designs. As more and more competitors from Asia and Europe challenged GM's market supremacy and as technological developments in manufacturing and information processing challenged GM's production advantages, GM's management responded by implementing changes in its organization design that continue into the second half of the 90s. The first signs of problems began to appear in 1981 when the company reported its first loss since 1921. This report coincided with the appointment of Roger Smith as CEO, the sixth GM CEO since Alfred P Sloan, Jr., who served from 1937 to 1956. Sloan created the modern version of GM through the development of the divisional organizational structure, which consisted of five independent divisions- Chevrolet, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Buick, and Cadillac-and the competing product strategy. The competing product strategy encouraged each division to compete for customers by delegating complete authority to each division to design, produce, market, and sell its own particular line of cars. The only limitation placed on the division was the overall corporate strategy of encouraging car buyers to think of "trading up" as each year's new models hit the show floors. Thus, the 'Chevrolet Division produced the starter cars, relatively inexpensive and within the price range of the first-time car buyer. But with increases in income the car buyer would be encouraged through promotion and selling efforts to consider the more expensive Pontiac and Oldsmobile vehicles, and ultimately the Buick and Cadillac. This traditional divisional design was in place throughout the post-World War I period when General Motors grew into the largest manufacturing organization in the world. But something happened along the way. The divisional structure as it evolved over time began to be identified as an impediment to progress and market response. One of the outgrowths of the structure was the development of a massive corporate support staff, which when created was supposed to provide expert advice and consultation to the divisions. But over time these staff members began to take over me decision making of the line units, and the decision making began to grind to a halt in endless discussions in endless committee meetings at corporate headquarters. As these corporate staff units increased their influence through the provision of valued information, they sought and received formal authority over many of the day-to-day decisions. Thus, when Roger Smith took the reins in 1981, he began the process that continues even to this day: redesigning GM's organizational structure with the specific purpose of pushing decision making down into the operating divisions and reducing the number of staff at corporate headquarters. In 1984, he announced his first move: the creation of two autonomous groups, BOC and CPC. BOC consisted of what had been the Buick, Oldsmobile, and 'Cadillac divisions, and CPC consisted of what had been Chevrolet, Pontiac, and GM of Canada. Smith delegated complete authority to each of the groups to organize in whatever way the managers thought was necessary to get GM back on track-to regain its competitive, growing, and profitable status. BOC decided to organize around four completely autonomous product groups- strategic business units (SBUS). Each product group would operate as Sloan had envisioned his divisional structure would operate, exercising complete authority to design, produce, and sell cars. By contrast, CPC organized around functional lines with centralized authority, but with a matrix overlay to facilitate communication across functional lines. When 1993 rolled around, GM had replaced Robert Stempel, who had replaced Roger Smith, with Jack Smith. Stempel had been in office barely two years, yet the board of directors was unhappy with his deliberate management style. He simply was moving too slowly in carrying out the turnaround that Roger Smith had begun. The new CEO responded to the news that GM's market share had dropped to its lowest point in 23 years, 29 percent, by creating a single operating division, North American Operations (NAO); paring corporate staff from 13,500 to 2,500; reducing the number of car models from 62 to 54; combining 27 different purchasing departments into one; and eliminating nearly 16,500 hourly jobs by offering early retirement. These seemingly harsh measures were necessary according to Jack Smith to assure GM's very survival as an automaker. The organizational design that GM now counts on to enable it to survive and compete identifies the five traditional divisions-Chevrolet, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Buick, and Cadillac-as marketing units. But all production, product design, and purchasing will be done in one separate unit. The story of GM's reorganization efforts remains unfinished. In fact, what progress the company makes will depend upon'; Jack Smith's success at eliminating the remaining vestiges of bureaucracy that persist even in the midst of massive efforts to make the company more responsive to market conditions" and technological developments. Centralization or Decentralization? Which is the appropriate response: centralize some functions, such as purchasing and production, and decentralize other functions such as marketing? Despite all the efforts of its CEOS from Roger Smith to Jack Smith, GM continues its long slide down the profitability curve. The efforts to reverse this slide through organization redesign and other measures seem to have yielded little gain. If General Motors cannot cope with the rigors of global competition, can the country? 1. Identify the environmental forces that have driven General Motors to change its organizational design. 2. Have the changes in structure been in the appropriate direction? Have they been misguided? Explain your answer and your reasoning. 4 General Motors has a collaboration with Hindustan Motors-makers of iconicAmbassador.However,they are also trying to independently establish own set up.what changes may happen to their parent organization structure?. 3. Discuss the possibility that redesigning the organizational structure is actually an irrelevant response: to what ails General Motors. General Motors:Its Changing Organizations Design The trials and tribulations of General Motors (GM) during the 1980s and 1990s mirror those of organizations in the United States and around the world. GM's position of market leader in automobile production and sales began to falter in the early 1980s along with market leaders in other industries. Competitive forces throughout the world were forcing US firms to rethink their strategies and their organization designs. As more and more competitors from Asia and Europe challenged GM's market supremacy and as technological developments in manufacturing and information processing challenged GM's production advantages, GM's management responded by implementing changes in its organization design that continue into the second half of the 90s. The first signs of problems began to appear in 1981 when the company reported its first loss since 1921. This report coincided with the appointment of Roger Smith as CEO, the sixth GM CEO since Alfred P Sloan, Jr., who served from 1937 to 1956. Sloan created the modern version of GM through the development of the divisional organizational structure, which consisted of five independent divisions- Chevrolet, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Buick, and Cadillac-and the competing product strategy. The competing product strategy encouraged each division to compete for customers by delegating complete authority to each division to design, produce, market, and sell its own particular line of cars. The only limitation placed on the division was the overall corporate strategy of encouraging car buyers to think of "trading up" as each year's new models hit the show floors. Thus, the 'Chevrolet Division produced the starter cars, relatively inexpensive and within the price range of the first-time car buyer. But with increases in income the car buyer would be encouraged through promotion and selling efforts to consider the more expensive Pontiac and Oldsmobile vehicles, and ultimately the Buick and Cadillac. This traditional divisional design was in place throughout the post-World War I period when General Motors grew into the largest manufacturing organization in the world. But something happened along the way. The divisional structure as it evolved over time began to be identified as an impediment to progress and market response. One of the outgrowths of the structure was the development of a massive corporate support staff, which when created was supposed to provide expert advice and consultation to the divisions. But over time these staff members began to take over me decision making of the line units, and the decision making began to grind to a halt in endless discussions in endless committee meetings at corporate headquarters. As these corporate staff units increased their influence through the provision of valued information, they sought and received formal authority over many of the day-to-day decisions. Thus, when Roger Smith took the reins in 1981, he began the process that continues even to this day: redesigning GM's organizational structure with the specific purpose of pushing decision making down into the operating divisions and reducing the number of staff at corporate headquarters. In 1984, he announced his first move: the creation of two autonomous groups, BOC and CPC. BOC consisted of what had been the Buick, Oldsmobile, and 'Cadillac divisions, and CPC consisted of what had been Chevrolet, Pontiac, and GM of Canada. Smith delegated complete authority to each of the groups to organize in whatever way the managers thought was necessary to get GM back on track-to regain its competitive, growing, and profitable status. BOC decided to organize around four completely autonomous product groups- strategic business units (SBUS). Each product group would operate as Sloan had envisioned his divisional structure would operate, exercising complete authority to design, produce, and sell cars. By contrast, CPC organized around functional lines with centralized authority, but with a matrix overlay to facilitate communication across functional lines. When 1993 rolled around, GM had replaced Robert Stempel, who had replaced Roger Smith, with Jack Smith. Stempel had been in office barely two years, yet the board of directors was unhappy with his deliberate management style. He simply was moving too slowly in carrying out the turnaround that Roger Smith had begun. The new CEO responded to the news that GM's market share had dropped to its lowest point in 23 years, 29 percent, by creating a single operating division, North American Operations (NAO); paring corporate staff from 13,500 to 2,500; reducing the number of car models from 62 to 54; combining 27 different purchasing departments into one; and eliminating nearly 16,500 hourly jobs by offering early retirement. These seemingly harsh measures were necessary according to Jack Smith to assure GM's very survival as an automaker. The organizational design that GM now counts on to enable it to survive and compete identifies the five traditional divisions-Chevrolet, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Buick, and Cadillac-as marketing units. But all production, product design, and purchasing will be done in one separate unit. The story of GM's reorganization efforts remains unfinished. In fact, what progress the company makes will depend upon'; Jack Smith's success at eliminating the remaining vestiges of bureaucracy that persist even in the midst of massive efforts to make the company more responsive to market conditions" and technological developments. Centralization or Decentralization? Which is the appropriate response: centralize some functions, such as purchasing and production, and decentralize other functions such as marketing? Despite all the efforts of its CEOS from Roger Smith to Jack Smith, GM continues its long slide down the profitability curve. The efforts to reverse this slide through organization redesign and other measures seem to have yielded little gain. If General Motors cannot cope with the rigors of global competition, can the country? 1. Identify the environmental forces that have driven General Motors to change its organizational design. 2. Have the changes in structure been in the appropriate direction? Have they been misguided? Explain your answer and your reasoning. 4 General Motors has a collaboration with Hindustan Motors-makers of iconicAmbassador.However,they are also trying to independently establish own set up.what changes may happen to their parent organization structure?. 3. Discuss the possibility that redesigning the organizational structure is actually an irrelevant response: to what ails General Motors.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
1Environmental forces that influence GM to change its hierarchical plans are the accompanying Competition outside the United States are expanding on a worldwide level Asia and Europe The best model wa... View the full answer
Related Book For
Economics
ISBN: 978-0073375694
18th edition
Authors: Campbell R. McConnell, Stanley L. Brue, Sean M. Flynn
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these human resource management questions
-
Marina Company performed services on account for $160,000. This transaction will O A. increase assets and increase equity by $160,000. OB. increase assets and increase liabilities by $160,000. O C....
-
The late 1980s and early 1990s were a significant time for Eastern Europe. Several national boundaries and political ideologies, as well as the names of a few countries, changed during this period....
-
The United States market shares (percentages) of world manufacturing are described by the time-series plots in Figs. 128 and 129 for various years. Fig. 128 Fig. 129 a. If the Obama administration...
-
Mary, Ali and Nzioka are trading as Mali enterprises. They share profits and losses in the ratio of 2 = 1 1 respectively. The following is a statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31st...
-
Describe the adverse effects of vibrations and chatter in machining.
-
The block is subjected to the eccentric load shown. Determine the normal stress developed at points A and B. Neglect the weight of the block. 100 mm 150 kN 150 mm
-
Determine whether each of the following is true or false. In each case, assume \(P\) is located at \(t=0\) and \(F\) is located at \(t=n\), and the \(A\) s are spread uniformly over the planning...
-
Finding Financial Information Refer to the financial statements of Urban Outfitters given in Appendix C at the end of this book. Required: 1. The company uses lower of cost or market to account for...
-
Interest I, Shakira Wishes To Barrow 8230,000 Eroun A Bank To Buy A House. The But It Is Compounded Monthly. She Wants To Know What Ber Monthly Payment 4.8% Per Year In Order To Pay Off The Loan In...
-
You have just been hired as a management trainee by Toronto-based Capri Fashions Inc., u nationwide distributor of designer Caps. The company has exclusive distribution of the Caps, and sales have...
-
1. An economy's natural rate of unemployment is a. the economy's long-run target level of unemployment. b. the amount of unemployment that the economy normally experiences. c. the lowest rate of...
-
You will write a bash script that simulates the collection of data from two home sensors: the gas sensor and the temperature sensor: A. Create a directory named "Sensor_Dtata" in the home directory....
-
The acquisition cost of equipment is $ 4 5 2 , 0 0 0 4 5 2 , 0 0 0 Residual value ( ( the estimated salvage value ) ) is $ 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 and the useful life is 9 9 years. with linear...
-
The diameters of the main rotor and tail rotor of a single - engine helicopter are 7 . 6 7 m and 1 . 0 5 m , respectively. The respective rotational speeds are 4 4 8 rev / min and 4 , 1 3 0 rev / min...
-
Question 4: Use best first search to get to the goal I from A Explain the open and closed lists and write the final path. E G 5 QO
-
What is SKUin azure cloud ? ? O Software Kernel Unit O Stock Keeping Unit O Software Keeping Unit O Stock Keeping Utility
-
Image transcription text PART ONE You are provided with the following data for Kasama Ltd and Choma Ltd. KASAMA LTD Boom Normal Recession Year 2020 2021 2020 2021 2020 2021 End of Year Price (K) 20...
-
Evenflow Power Co. is considering a new project that is a little riskier than the current operations of the company. Thus, management has decided to add an additional 1.5% to the company's overall...
-
Over the years, the Federal Reserve Banks have printed many billions of dollars more in currency than U.S. households, businesses, and financial institutions now hold. Where is this missing money?...
-
Explain why zoning laws, which allow certain land uses only in specific locations, might be justified in dealing with a problem of negative externalities. Explain why tax breaks to businesses that...
-
What types of products do the DVCs typically export? How do those exports relate to the law of comparative advantage? How do tariffs by IACs reduce the standard of living of DVCs?
-
On 1 April 2013 a business purchased a machine costing 112,000. The machine can be used for a total of 20,000 hours over an estimated life of 48 months. At the end of that time the machine is...
-
(a) The following trial balance was extracted from the books of M. Jackson on 30 April 2017. From it, and the note below it, prepare his statement of profit or loss for the year ending 30 April 2017,...
-
On 1 January 2015 a business purchased a laser printer costing 1,800. The printer has an estimated life of four years after which it will have no residual value. It is expected that the output from...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App