Evaluate the reporting quality of the supplied article by comparing the article to criteria from the official
Question:
Evaluate the reporting quality of the supplied article by comparing the article to criteria from the official quantitative guide to reporting quality. For each section of the journal article as displayed in the assignment template, select from the drop-down list a rating for the reporting quality of that section: Excellent, Good, Fair or Poor. Then, for each section of the article add a typed prose justification of your rating-scale answer, evaluating the reporting quality of the article section by addressing as many criteria as you can from the official guide for that section within the limited word count. Higher scoring text answers will match a plausible rating-scale answer and include correct evaluation of reporting quality, and state the evidence-based practice implications of that reporting quality.
- Title- 5%
Reporting quality |
- Abstract- 10%
Reporting quality |
- Introduction - 15%
Reporting quality |
- Methods - 25%
Reporting quality |
- Results - 25%
Reporting quality |
- Discussion - 15%
Reporting quality |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467718/#
Probability And Statistics For Engineering And The Sciences
ISBN: 9781305251809
9th Edition
Authors: Jay L. Devore