Imagine that a firm that specializes in investment in innovative products employs you. These investments can...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Imagine that a firm that specializes in investment in innovative products employs you. These investments can yield high profits but are also risky. Your boss believes that the best way to manage professionals like you is to make them think carefully about investment decisions. To increase responsibility for the decisions you make, he is initiating a new bonus policy. Professionals like you will get a base salary and then a bonus based on their performance. That is, if the outcome of an investment decision you made yielded profit, you will be rewarded with a certain percentage of the profit as a bonus. If, on the other hand, the investment led to a loss, you will be penalized by a certain percentage of the loss. The old bonus policy Under the old bonus policy, a bonus account existed. Certain percentage of the profit from the investment that you made was added to this bonus account. For instance, suppose that you made an investment of $100,000 (using the firm's or the client's funds) and it yielded a profit of $20,000, say in a year. In that case, you would be rewarded with a 20% bonus, and your bonus account would be credited in the amount of $4,000. The new bonus policy Under the new bonus policy, both bonuses and penalties are in effect. Thus, in addition to the example of a potential bonus described above, if the value of the $100,000 went down to $80,000 at the end of the year, and resulted in a loss of $20,000, you will be penalized 20% on the loss. That is, your bonus account would decrease by the amount of $4,000. Realizing, however, that issuing penalties may make professionals like you overly cautious, your boss is concerned about opportunity costs. That is, he is concerned that the existence of penalties may make professionals like you to be overly risk averse and potentially miss high-profit investment opportunities. Thus, he is planning to sample your opinions before making a final decision. Consider the following: You are going to invest a certain amount of money in, say, pharmaceutical companies. stocks. Suppose you have two options, either invest (the same amount!) in company A or in company B. The former is a more established company and hence less risky in the sense that the fluctuations of its stock prices are smaller. See next page for the symmetric diagram that depicts the spread of these investment prospects. loss →gain -- - B₂ Az A =B A₁ B₁ Where A₁ and B₁ are considered gains and A2 and B2 are considered losses. Ā, and B are the average profits of the investments. Assume also that all these values are known to you before deciding. A = B A₁-AA-A₂ B₁ - B = B-B₂ (Average profits of the two investments are equal) (Absolute value of gains and losses are identical for A) (Absolute value of gains and losses are identical for B) As it is clear from the above diagram, the stocks of the companies A and B both go up, both remain unchanged, or both go down. In other words, the stock price of the two companies moves in the same direction. The difference between A and B is that the stock of company B fluctuates more than the stock of company A. Obviously, you want to obtain the highest value, but you do not know ahead of time whether the investment will be successful or not. You, however, can get an estimate in the form of the probability of success. Again, both A and B have the same probability of success, denoted q. Thus, you have two potential states of the world: Success(A₁, B₁) Faiilure (A2, B2) with probability = q with probability = 1-q Bonus/Penalty and total income determination Based on the new policy, your income (W) will be determined as follows: If you choose to invest in A, there are two potential outcomes for your income: Wsuccess WFailure k+b(A₁ - A) k+p(A₂ - A) Where (A₁>A) Where (A₂<A) On the other hand, if you choose to invest in B, the two potential outcomes are: Wsuccess k+b(B₁ - B) WFailure k+p(B₂-B) Where (B₁>B) Where (B₂<B) Where, k is the amount of your base salary, and b and p are the bonus (b) and penalty (p) coefficients (i.e., percentages) respectively. Your outcome will be determined by (1) base salary (k), (2) bonus percentage (b), (3) penalty percentage (p), and (4) probability of investment success (q). Setting b and p Before formally initiating the new policy, your boss would like to get a feel for what would be the appropriate coefficients of bonus and penalty; that is, the value of b and p. Your task is to consider the values of b and p that will motivate you to make the best investment decisions. For example, assume that your base salary (k) is $70,000 and you are considering an investment of $200,000. Suppose that option A can potentially lead to a profit of $40,000 (or a loss of $40,000). On the other hand, option B can potentially yield a profit of $80,000 (or a loss of $80,000). You do not know for sure what will happen, but both A and B will either succeed together or fail together. That is, if A leads to a profit, B will also lead to a profit, and if A leads to a loss, B will also lead to a loss. Therefore, the movements of A and B are perfectly correlated. Option B has a higher potential profit than option A, but B also has a higher potential loss than option A. While you do not like penalties, your boss does not like opportunities lost (namely, investing in A and earning $40,000 profit, instead of $80,000 profit, which would have resulted from investing in B). Thus, he wants you to specify the values of b (bonus coefficient) and p (penalty coefficient) that will not push you to prefer either A or B. That is, he wants to set the b (bonus coefficient) and p (penalty coefficient) in a way that your choice between A and B will only be influenced by your best judgment, rather than by the values of b and p. In other words, your boss does not want the bonus/penalty structure to affect your investment choice between A and A. An example Your choice of b and p leads to different levels of potential bonuses and penalties. Consider the following example of two choices of the coefficients b and p. A or B Example: Bonus/Penalty A B b and p A₁ (+$40,000) A₂ B₁ (-$40,000) (+$80,000) B2 (-$80,000) Bonus (b) = .30 +12,000 +24,000 Penalty (p) = .10 -4,000 -8,000 Bonus (b) = .40 +16,000 +32,000 Penalty (p) = .05 -2,000 -4,000 Probability of success Your choice of b and p may depend on the probability of success, q. If q is very high, your boss does not think you need to get a large bonus. If, however, q is very low, there is a great chance of failure and your boss will be inclined to consider a higher bonus coefficient (b), or a lower penalty coefficient (p). Your task Assume that you are considering investing in either option A or option B, as described in the previous pages. Your task is to provide the values of the bonus and penalty coefficients b and p, in percentages, that would be acceptable to you. Fill in the table below. Probability of success Less risky - → More risky (a) 9 = .95 9 = .75 q = .50 q = .20 q=.10 q = .05 Coefficients Bonus (b) Penalty (p) In filling the above table, note the following: 1. Simply asking for high values of b (bonus) and low values of p (penalty) will not work; your boss will not agree to such an incentive scheme. The point of this task is to determine the bonus and penalty coefficients in a way that you would not be always inclined to invest in a less risky stock (i.e., option A), but would be open to investing in option B. In short, determine the values of b and p, so that you would be indifferent between investing in option A and option B. 2. In deciding the values, you can either go by row (filling the b coefficients first, and then entering the p coefficients), or by column (filling in the b and p for each level of q). 3. Provide a typed description (300 words) of your rationale for selecting these values. Upload it along with the form where you entered the b and p values. Imagine that a firm that specializes in investment in innovative products employs you. These investments can yield high profits but are also risky. Your boss believes that the best way to manage professionals like you is to make them think carefully about investment decisions. To increase responsibility for the decisions you make, he is initiating a new bonus policy. Professionals like you will get a base salary and then a bonus based on their performance. That is, if the outcome of an investment decision you made yielded profit, you will be rewarded with a certain percentage of the profit as a bonus. If, on the other hand, the investment led to a loss, you will be penalized by a certain percentage of the loss. The old bonus policy Under the old bonus policy, a bonus account existed. Certain percentage of the profit from the investment that you made was added to this bonus account. For instance, suppose that you made an investment of $100,000 (using the firm's or the client's funds) and it yielded a profit of $20,000, say in a year. In that case, you would be rewarded with a 20% bonus, and your bonus account would be credited in the amount of $4,000. The new bonus policy Under the new bonus policy, both bonuses and penalties are in effect. Thus, in addition to the example of a potential bonus described above, if the value of the $100,000 went down to $80,000 at the end of the year, and resulted in a loss of $20,000, you will be penalized 20% on the loss. That is, your bonus account would decrease by the amount of $4,000. Realizing, however, that issuing penalties may make professionals like you overly cautious, your boss is concerned about opportunity costs. That is, he is concerned that the existence of penalties may make professionals like you to be overly risk averse and potentially miss high-profit investment opportunities. Thus, he is planning to sample your opinions before making a final decision. Consider the following: You are going to invest a certain amount of money in, say, pharmaceutical companies. stocks. Suppose you have two options, either invest (the same amount!) in company A or in company B. The former is a more established company and hence less risky in the sense that the fluctuations of its stock prices are smaller. See next page for the symmetric diagram that depicts the spread of these investment prospects. loss →gain -- - B₂ Az A =B A₁ B₁ Where A₁ and B₁ are considered gains and A2 and B2 are considered losses. Ā, and B are the average profits of the investments. Assume also that all these values are known to you before deciding. A = B A₁-AA-A₂ B₁ - B = B-B₂ (Average profits of the two investments are equal) (Absolute value of gains and losses are identical for A) (Absolute value of gains and losses are identical for B) As it is clear from the above diagram, the stocks of the companies A and B both go up, both remain unchanged, or both go down. In other words, the stock price of the two companies moves in the same direction. The difference between A and B is that the stock of company B fluctuates more than the stock of company A. Obviously, you want to obtain the highest value, but you do not know ahead of time whether the investment will be successful or not. You, however, can get an estimate in the form of the probability of success. Again, both A and B have the same probability of success, denoted q. Thus, you have two potential states of the world: Success(A₁, B₁) Faiilure (A2, B2) with probability = q with probability = 1-q Bonus/Penalty and total income determination Based on the new policy, your income (W) will be determined as follows: If you choose to invest in A, there are two potential outcomes for your income: Wsuccess WFailure k+b(A₁ - A) k+p(A₂ - A) Where (A₁>A) Where (A₂<A) On the other hand, if you choose to invest in B, the two potential outcomes are: Wsuccess k+b(B₁ - B) WFailure k+p(B₂-B) Where (B₁>B) Where (B₂<B) Where, k is the amount of your base salary, and b and p are the bonus (b) and penalty (p) coefficients (i.e., percentages) respectively. Your outcome will be determined by (1) base salary (k), (2) bonus percentage (b), (3) penalty percentage (p), and (4) probability of investment success (q). Setting b and p Before formally initiating the new policy, your boss would like to get a feel for what would be the appropriate coefficients of bonus and penalty; that is, the value of b and p. Your task is to consider the values of b and p that will motivate you to make the best investment decisions. For example, assume that your base salary (k) is $70,000 and you are considering an investment of $200,000. Suppose that option A can potentially lead to a profit of $40,000 (or a loss of $40,000). On the other hand, option B can potentially yield a profit of $80,000 (or a loss of $80,000). You do not know for sure what will happen, but both A and B will either succeed together or fail together. That is, if A leads to a profit, B will also lead to a profit, and if A leads to a loss, B will also lead to a loss. Therefore, the movements of A and B are perfectly correlated. Option B has a higher potential profit than option A, but B also has a higher potential loss than option A. While you do not like penalties, your boss does not like opportunities lost (namely, investing in A and earning $40,000 profit, instead of $80,000 profit, which would have resulted from investing in B). Thus, he wants you to specify the values of b (bonus coefficient) and p (penalty coefficient) that will not push you to prefer either A or B. That is, he wants to set the b (bonus coefficient) and p (penalty coefficient) in a way that your choice between A and B will only be influenced by your best judgment, rather than by the values of b and p. In other words, your boss does not want the bonus/penalty structure to affect your investment choice between A and A. An example Your choice of b and p leads to different levels of potential bonuses and penalties. Consider the following example of two choices of the coefficients b and p. A or B Example: Bonus/Penalty A B b and p A₁ (+$40,000) A₂ B₁ (-$40,000) (+$80,000) B2 (-$80,000) Bonus (b) = .30 +12,000 +24,000 Penalty (p) = .10 -4,000 -8,000 Bonus (b) = .40 +16,000 +32,000 Penalty (p) = .05 -2,000 -4,000 Probability of success Your choice of b and p may depend on the probability of success, q. If q is very high, your boss does not think you need to get a large bonus. If, however, q is very low, there is a great chance of failure and your boss will be inclined to consider a higher bonus coefficient (b), or a lower penalty coefficient (p). Your task Assume that you are considering investing in either option A or option B, as described in the previous pages. Your task is to provide the values of the bonus and penalty coefficients b and p, in percentages, that would be acceptable to you. Fill in the table below. Probability of success Less risky - → More risky (a) 9 = .95 9 = .75 q = .50 q = .20 q=.10 q = .05 Coefficients Bonus (b) Penalty (p) In filling the above table, note the following: 1. Simply asking for high values of b (bonus) and low values of p (penalty) will not work; your boss will not agree to such an incentive scheme. The point of this task is to determine the bonus and penalty coefficients in a way that you would not be always inclined to invest in a less risky stock (i.e., option A), but would be open to investing in option B. In short, determine the values of b and p, so that you would be indifferent between investing in option A and option B. 2. In deciding the values, you can either go by row (filling the b coefficients first, and then entering the p coefficients), or by column (filling in the b and p for each level of q). 3. Provide a typed description (300 words) of your rationale for selecting these values. Upload it along with the form where you entered the b and p values.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
The new bonus policy implemented by the firm for professionals in the investment department aims to increase responsibility and careful consideration ... View the full answer
Related Book For
Transportation A Global Supply Chain Perspective
ISBN: 9781337406642
9th Edition
Authors: Robert A. Novack, Brian Gibson, Yoshinori Suzuki, John J. Coyle
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
Googles ease of use and superior search results have propelled the search engine to its num- ber one status, ousting the early dominance of competitors such as WebCrawler and Infos- eek. Even later...
-
From the attached article: 1) Introduction - Describe the case. What happened? When did that happen? Who got involved? 2) Identify the link between the case and global market changes?...
-
Prestopino Corporation produces motorcycle batteries. Prestopino turns out 1,500 batteries a day at a cost of $6 per battery for materials and labor. It takes the firm 22 days to convert raw...
-
What are hydrogen bonds and how are they important in the body?
-
Water flows at 0.65 m/s through a hose with a diameter of 3cm. The diameter of the nozzle is 0.30 cm. (a) At what speed does the water pass through the nozzle? (b) If the pump at one end of the hose...
-
Prepare a statement of cash flows for Tsingtao Breweries, China, from the following scrambled list of items. Increase in inventories 8,000 Operating income Dividends 220,000 30,000 Increase in...
-
On December 5, 2016, Super Circuit Store sold gift certificates totaling $12,000. By December 31, 2016, all but $2,125 worth of these certificates had been redeemed tor merchandise. Outstanding...
-
(08 Marks) In the Fig.1(c), compare the output of the network, if the activation function is a sigmoid 1 function y=- and (X1, X2) (1, 1). 1+e 1+1 AYY Y YC.) B YC. ye D 46 (06 Marks)
-
The Apex Television Company has to decide on the number of 65 and 55 sets to be produced at one of its factories. Market research indicates that at most 280 of the 65 sets and 70 of the 55 sets can...
-
Suppose you are considering two below strategies 1) a straddle and 2) a strangle. The straddle has a strike of $10 for both the call and put. The strangle has a lower strike of $8 for the put and a...
-
Which are disadvantages of a single life annuity? I. Annuitant has irrevocably given up the principal payment. II. Annuitant may die before the return of the principal payment. III. Annuitant...
-
Which of the following is not a method of assessing a clients risk tolerance? A. Conversation. B. Psychometric test. C. Risk tolerance questionnaire. D. Tabulated test.
-
Which statement is correct regarding an REIT? I. Mortgage REITS can only invest in long-term mortgages. II. Both equity and mortgage REITS distribute at least 90 percent of their net investment...
-
When there is a conflict between Statement on Standards in Personal Financial Planning Services No. 1 and laws or regulations, the laws or regulations will prevail unless they_____ the statement. A....
-
Investment planning goals need to be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and_________ . A. Accountable. B. Conservative. C. Optimistic. D. Time-bound.
-
Superstar Inc. had a $50M contract to complete a sophisticated software program that would aid in the discovery and extraction of gold. By the end of 2020, 80% of the program was completed, but Bob...
-
Why should you not model a decision variable as a random variable with a probability distribution?
-
CEO John Spychalski is concerned about a problem that has existed at CBN railroad for almost 20 years now. The continuous problem has been that the locomotives used by the company are not very...
-
The overall growth of global trade has more than doubled since 2000. Why? What has been the most important factor prompting this growth. Is this rate of growth likely to continue in the future? Why...
-
Hardee is a medium-sized, regional LTL carrier servicing the chemical industry. Because many of the shipments hauled by Hardee are hazardous in nature, its drivers need specialized training and must...
-
You are provided with the worksheet for Norman Pty Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2019. The adjustments have already been made and the worksheet begins with the adjusted trial balance. Assume all...
-
The unadjusted trial balance of Innovative Computers Pty Ltd on 30 June 2019 is presented below. The following additional information is available. 1. The inventories as of 30 June 2019 were as...
-
Basic Chemicals Ltd produces a highly flammable chemical product. The company experienced a flood on 1 April 2019 that destroyed its entire work in process inventory but did not affect the raw...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App