In Conley v. Gibson, the Court reversed the holding of the prior court and denied the...

Transcribed Image Text:

In Conley v. Gibson, the Court reversed the holding of the prior court and denied the Union's motion to dismiss because: Rule 8 only requires a short plain statement which puts the other party on notice. There was overwhelming evidence that the union failed to represent the African American members The respondent party knew what they were doing and did not need more notice as they were the party accused of the illegal action. All of the above In Conley v. Gibson, the Court reversed the holding of the prior court and denied the Union's motion to dismiss because: Rule 8 only requires a short plain statement which puts the other party on notice. There was overwhelming evidence that the union failed to represent the African American members The respondent party knew what they were doing and did not need more notice as they were the party accused of the illegal action. All of the above

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The detailed answer for the above question is provide... View the full answer