In order to understand exactly HOW important details are, this extra credit is based on methodology....

 

Transcribed Image Text:

In order to understand exactly HOW important details are, this extra credit is based on methodology. On YouTube, there's a show called, "Cold Justice." Kelly Sigler is a former Harris County, State of Texas prosecutor and is on the show. She, along with Yolanda Mcclary, a Crime Scene Investigator, goes to various towns that have had unsolved murder cases and absolutely tears into these cases that have been cold for years. Many of them are solved within weeks. How? ATTENTION TO DETAIL! WARNING! SOME CASES ARE MORE GRAPHIC IN NATURE THAN OTHERS. IF YOU ARE UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE, PLEASE CHOOSE ANOTHER CASE FOR ANALYSIS! Because details are so important in law, I want you to really LOOK at what Ms. Sigler is doing in order to solve the case. She looks at every detail, leaving no stone unturned. Her methodology is quite simple but extremely effective. COLD JUSTICE Go to the YouTube link above and find the show, "Cold Justice." You can pick any case study you wish, but it must be a case study. Once you've picked a case to view, answer the following questions for your report. You need to answer these questions in full and complete sentences. 1. What is the case name? 2. What is the episode number? 3. Who was murdered and how? 4. Who are the family members? 5. What are the specific details of the case? 6. What is known in the case to the investigators? 7. Who are the suspects in this case? 8. What are the specifics of each of the suspects? 9. What details were given at the scene of the crime? 10. How are the suspects eliminated from the board? 11. Who is the final suspect? 12. How is that suspect caught, if the case is resolved? 13. What methodology does Ms. Sigler use to solve the case? 14. Was the case solved? 15. What specific details were found that helped solve the case? 16. CONCLUSION: Please know that I'm asking for the methodology of how Ms. Sigler is analyzing her cases. That's the takeaway. In reviewing how Ms. Sigler used each detail of evidence. Analyze how she used the process of elimination and the process of every detail to her advantage in solving the case. THEN, discuss how can you use these critical thinking skills and systematic types of methods as a manager or supervisor when documenting details for performance reviews, employee evaluations, or disciplinary actions. I look forward to seeing how you plan to incorporate these skills, or reading about how you already use these types of skills in your workplace. The citation page should include the name of the show, the episode name, and the number. In order to understand exactly HOW important details are, this extra credit is based on methodology. On YouTube, there's a show called, "Cold Justice." Kelly Sigler is a former Harris County, State of Texas prosecutor and is on the show. She, along with Yolanda Mcclary, a Crime Scene Investigator, goes to various towns that have had unsolved murder cases and absolutely tears into these cases that have been cold for years. Many of them are solved within weeks. How? ATTENTION TO DETAIL! WARNING! SOME CASES ARE MORE GRAPHIC IN NATURE THAN OTHERS. IF YOU ARE UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE, PLEASE CHOOSE ANOTHER CASE FOR ANALYSIS! Because details are so important in law, I want you to really LOOK at what Ms. Sigler is doing in order to solve the case. She looks at every detail, leaving no stone unturned. Her methodology is quite simple but extremely effective. COLD JUSTICE Go to the YouTube link above and find the show, "Cold Justice." You can pick any case study you wish, but it must be a case study. Once you've picked a case to view, answer the following questions for your report. You need to answer these questions in full and complete sentences. 1. What is the case name? 2. What is the episode number? 3. Who was murdered and how? 4. Who are the family members? 5. What are the specific details of the case? 6. What is known in the case to the investigators? 7. Who are the suspects in this case? 8. What are the specifics of each of the suspects? 9. What details were given at the scene of the crime? 10. How are the suspects eliminated from the board? 11. Who is the final suspect? 12. How is that suspect caught, if the case is resolved? 13. What methodology does Ms. Sigler use to solve the case? 14. Was the case solved? 15. What specific details were found that helped solve the case? 16. CONCLUSION: Please know that I'm asking for the methodology of how Ms. Sigler is analyzing her cases. That's the takeaway. In reviewing how Ms. Sigler used each detail of evidence. Analyze how she used the process of elimination and the process of every detail to her advantage in solving the case. THEN, discuss how can you use these critical thinking skills and systematic types of methods as a manager or supervisor when documenting details for performance reviews, employee evaluations, or disciplinary actions. I look forward to seeing how you plan to incorporate these skills, or reading about how you already use these types of skills in your workplace. The citation page should include the name of the show, the episode name, and the number.