In the 1990s, top managers of Liz Claiborne decided that the best way to improve performance...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
In the 1990s, top managers of Liz Claiborne decided that the best way to improve performance at the company was to increase the lines of clothing and accessories it sold. All its competitors were adding new clothing brands and opening new stores so to expand quickly its managers decided to acquire many smaller branded clothing and accessory companies. They also decided to start many new clothing brands of their own using in- house design and marketing expertise. Top managers reasoned that increased clothing sales would lead to greater operating efficiencies so rising sales would also result in rising profits. As a result of this course of decision making, by 2005 Liz Claiborne had grown to 36 different nationwide brands. But while its sales revenues soared from $2 billion to $5 billion its profits were falling because its operating costs were not falling. In fact, costs were rising because operating efficiency was falling because its top managers could no longer handle the enormous complexity involved in managing and differ- entiating between so many brands. 94 So, in 2006 Liz Claiborne recruited a new CEO, William McComb, to find a way to turn around the troubled company. After spending three months meeting with top managers and visiting its different operating groups, McComb decided that Liz Claiborne needed to reverse course and become smaller. He be- lieved Liz Claiborne had become too difficult to manage because managers were suffering from information overload; a new way to organize its activities had to be found one that would make the company easier to manage and lower costs. He believed the company had developed a "culture of complexity" that had gotten out of control. Liz Claiborne's core merchandising culture that had made it so successful had been lost because of its rapid growth and overly complex organizational structure. The CEO's major priority was to reduce the problems associated with managing its 36 different brands. As it grew, the company had created five different apparel divisions to manage its 36 brands; brands were grouped into different divisions according to nature of the clothing or accessories they made. For example, luxury designer lines such as Ellen Tracy were grouped into one division; clothes for working women such as its signature Liz Claiborne and Dana Buchman brands were in a second; trendy, hip clothing directed at young customers such as its Juicy Couture line were in a third division, and so on. Each division was controlled by a separate management team, and each division performed all the functional activities, such as marketing and design, needed to support its brands. Costs were rising because of the duplication of activities between divisions, and increasing competition from other clothing manufacturers was resulting in new pressure to lower prices to retail stores to protect sales. McComb decided it was necessary to streamline Liz Claiborne. First, he decided that the company would either try to sell, license, or close down 16 of its 36 brands and focus on the remaining 20 that had the best chance of generating good profits in the future. 95 To make better decisions concerning these 20 brands, he decided to reduce the number of divisions from five to two. Now, only two different teams of top managers would be managing these brands and reporting to him, the change also allowed him to reduce the duplication of marketing, distribution, and retail functions across divisions which led to major cost savings. McComb cliamed this would bring "focus, energy and clarity" to the way each division operates. The two remaining divisions are now Liz Claiborne's retail division called "direct brands" and its wholesale division called "partnered brands." The retail division is responsible for the brands sold primarily through Liz Claiborne's own retail store chains such as its Kate Spade, Lucky Brand Jeans, and Juicy Couture chains. The goals of grouping together its fastest-growing brands is to allow divisional managers to make better marketing and distribution decisions to attract more customers, he also planned to plans to open 300 more stores in the next few years to add to its 433 specialty stores and 350 outlet stores. On the other hand, the problem in the wholesale division, which sells branded apparel lines such as Liz Claiborne and Dana Buchman directly to department stores and other retailers, is to reduce costs. If managers of the wholesale division can find ways to improve operating efficiency, it can offer stores such as Dillard's and Macy's lower clothing prices to encourage them to buy its brands. Wholesale managers also began to partner with department store chains to develop exclusive lines of branded clothingt. In 2007, for example, an agreement was formed with JCPenney to launch a line called Liz & Co. that will be sold only in Penney's stores. Thus, CEO McComb realized that to reduce complexity and allow each division to build the right merchandising culture it was necessary to change the way Liz Claiborne operated. McComb realized that the real problem was that each division faced a quite different set of opportunities and strategic problems, and now the managers of each division can focus on solving the specific set of problems to achieve the best performance from their particular brands. By the beginning of 2009, McComb realized that his new plan was not working as intended costs were not falling fast enough, and the two remaining divisions were still experiencing major problems managing their 20 brands and responding to customers' changing needs. So in 2009, he began a new round of decision making to find ways to shrink the company. Each division's managers were told to form a turnaround team that should recommend which of its its remaining brands should be eliminated and how to find ways to streamline its functional operations to reduce costs. Since 2009, the company has eliminated five more brands, it has also closed down many 2. 3. more distribution centers, and worked to find ways to outsource its functional activities to reduce costs. In October 2009, to simplify distribution, Liz Claiborne entered into a long- term licensing agreement with JCPenney, which became the exclusive department store desti-nation for all Liz Claiborne and Claiborne-branded merchandise. Plans to increase the number of its stores were put on hold when in the fall of 2009 Liz Claiborne said there had been declines in the 15-25 percent range at its Juicy Couture, Lucky Brand, and Kate Spade chains. As a result, it planned to further streamline its operations and said that cost-cutting efforts would focus on further distribution center consolidation and reductions in its corporate, support, and production staff. McComb believes this new round of cuts will allow Liz Claiborne to return to profitability by the end of 2010. Its new streamlined organization will finally give managers the ability to make the decision necessary to increase its efficiency and effectiveness. Questions for Discussion Using the information , what kinds of decision-making errors and biases do you think may have led its managers to grow the size of the company so much and to add so many brands that the company became too complex to control? What main nonprogrammed decisions did McComb make to turn around the company's performance? How did they simplify and improve the decision-making process? Given that Liz Claiborne's main problems were not solved, what kinds of errors and biases do you think might have led McComb to not shrink the company enough? Search the Internet to see how well the company is currently performing. In the 1990s, top managers of Liz Claiborne decided that the best way to improve performance at the company was to increase the lines of clothing and accessories it sold. All its competitors were adding new clothing brands and opening new stores so to expand quickly its managers decided to acquire many smaller branded clothing and accessory companies. They also decided to start many new clothing brands of their own using in- house design and marketing expertise. Top managers reasoned that increased clothing sales would lead to greater operating efficiencies so rising sales would also result in rising profits. As a result of this course of decision making, by 2005 Liz Claiborne had grown to 36 different nationwide brands. But while its sales revenues soared from $2 billion to $5 billion its profits were falling because its operating costs were not falling. In fact, costs were rising because operating efficiency was falling because its top managers could no longer handle the enormous complexity involved in managing and differ- entiating between so many brands. 94 So, in 2006 Liz Claiborne recruited a new CEO, William McComb, to find a way to turn around the troubled company. After spending three months meeting with top managers and visiting its different operating groups, McComb decided that Liz Claiborne needed to reverse course and become smaller. He be- lieved Liz Claiborne had become too difficult to manage because managers were suffering from information overload; a new way to organize its activities had to be found one that would make the company easier to manage and lower costs. He believed the company had developed a "culture of complexity" that had gotten out of control. Liz Claiborne's core merchandising culture that had made it so successful had been lost because of its rapid growth and overly complex organizational structure. The CEO's major priority was to reduce the problems associated with managing its 36 different brands. As it grew, the company had created five different apparel divisions to manage its 36 brands; brands were grouped into different divisions according to nature of the clothing or accessories they made. For example, luxury designer lines such as Ellen Tracy were grouped into one division; clothes for working women such as its signature Liz Claiborne and Dana Buchman brands were in a second; trendy, hip clothing directed at young customers such as its Juicy Couture line were in a third division, and so on. Each division was controlled by a separate management team, and each division performed all the functional activities, such as marketing and design, needed to support its brands. Costs were rising because of the duplication of activities between divisions, and increasing competition from other clothing manufacturers was resulting in new pressure to lower prices to retail stores to protect sales. McComb decided it was necessary to streamline Liz Claiborne. First, he decided that the company would either try to sell, license, or close down 16 of its 36 brands and focus on the remaining 20 that had the best chance of generating good profits in the future. 95 To make better decisions concerning these 20 brands, he decided to reduce the number of divisions from five to two. Now, only two different teams of top managers would be managing these brands and reporting to him, the change also allowed him to reduce the duplication of marketing, distribution, and retail functions across divisions which led to major cost savings. McComb cliamed this would bring "focus, energy and clarity" to the way each division operates. The two remaining divisions are now Liz Claiborne's retail division called "direct brands" and its wholesale division called "partnered brands." The retail division is responsible for the brands sold primarily through Liz Claiborne's own retail store chains such as its Kate Spade, Lucky Brand Jeans, and Juicy Couture chains. The goals of grouping together its fastest-growing brands is to allow divisional managers to make better marketing and distribution decisions to attract more customers, he also planned to plans to open 300 more stores in the next few years to add to its 433 specialty stores and 350 outlet stores. On the other hand, the problem in the wholesale division, which sells branded apparel lines such as Liz Claiborne and Dana Buchman directly to department stores and other retailers, is to reduce costs. If managers of the wholesale division can find ways to improve operating efficiency, it can offer stores such as Dillard's and Macy's lower clothing prices to encourage them to buy its brands. Wholesale managers also began to partner with department store chains to develop exclusive lines of branded clothingt. In 2007, for example, an agreement was formed with JCPenney to launch a line called Liz & Co. that will be sold only in Penney's stores. Thus, CEO McComb realized that to reduce complexity and allow each division to build the right merchandising culture it was necessary to change the way Liz Claiborne operated. McComb realized that the real problem was that each division faced a quite different set of opportunities and strategic problems, and now the managers of each division can focus on solving the specific set of problems to achieve the best performance from their particular brands. By the beginning of 2009, McComb realized that his new plan was not working as intended costs were not falling fast enough, and the two remaining divisions were still experiencing major problems managing their 20 brands and responding to customers' changing needs. So in 2009, he began a new round of decision making to find ways to shrink the company. Each division's managers were told to form a turnaround team that should recommend which of its its remaining brands should be eliminated and how to find ways to streamline its functional operations to reduce costs. Since 2009, the company has eliminated five more brands, it has also closed down many 2. 3. more distribution centers, and worked to find ways to outsource its functional activities to reduce costs. In October 2009, to simplify distribution, Liz Claiborne entered into a long- term licensing agreement with JCPenney, which became the exclusive department store desti-nation for all Liz Claiborne and Claiborne-branded merchandise. Plans to increase the number of its stores were put on hold when in the fall of 2009 Liz Claiborne said there had been declines in the 15-25 percent range at its Juicy Couture, Lucky Brand, and Kate Spade chains. As a result, it planned to further streamline its operations and said that cost-cutting efforts would focus on further distribution center consolidation and reductions in its corporate, support, and production staff. McComb believes this new round of cuts will allow Liz Claiborne to return to profitability by the end of 2010. Its new streamlined organization will finally give managers the ability to make the decision necessary to increase its efficiency and effectiveness. Questions for Discussion Using the information , what kinds of decision-making errors and biases do you think may have led its managers to grow the size of the company so much and to add so many brands that the company became too complex to control? What main nonprogrammed decisions did McComb make to turn around the company's performance? How did they simplify and improve the decision-making process? Given that Liz Claiborne's main problems were not solved, what kinds of errors and biases do you think might have led McComb to not shrink the company enough? Search the Internet to see how well the company is currently performing.
Expert Answer:
Related Book For
International Marketing And Export Management
ISBN: 9781292016924
8th Edition
Authors: Gerald Albaum , Alexander Josiassen , Edwin Duerr
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these organizational behavior questions
-
Read the case study and answer the question below with a one page response. What does a SWOT analysis reveal about the overall attractiveness of Under Armours situation? Founded in 1996 by former...
-
1. How strong are the competitive forces confronting J. Crew in the market for specialty retail? Do a [Michael Porter] five-forces analysis to support your answer. (see chapter 3 in the textfor...
-
In February, a new company incurred the following total costs for the production of 10,000 units during its first month of operations: Variable Fixed $500,000 $350,000 Manufacturing Overhead $250,000...
-
Determine the voltage across the 5.0 resistor in the drawing. Which end of the resistor is at the higher potential? 5.0 10.0 10.012 10.0 V 15.0 V 2.0 v
-
The comparative statements of Larker Tool SA are presented below. LARKER TOOL SA Income Statement For the Years Ended December 31 LARKER TOOL SA Statements of Financial Position December 31 All sales...
-
Work functions and free energy functions are (a) Derived properties (c) Reference properties (b) Energy properties (d) None of these.
-
Dr. John Salvaggi is a chiropractor. As of December 31, he owned the following property that related to his professional practice. Cash ................ $ 3,500 Office Equipment .......... 6,400...
-
CH-CH, reacts 1000 times faster than Ph-CH=CH, with Br-HOAc but only 3.8 times faster with pCI-CH,SCI in HOAC at 25C. Explain.
-
Managers traditionally view the HR relationship as moving from recruitment and selection, to training and appraisal, career planning, and compensation. What challenge might this viewpoint create?
-
A risky portfolio pays a 15% rate of return with probability 60% in a good state or a 5% return with probability 40% in a bad state, and a T-bill pays 5%. What is the risk premium on the risky...
-
a. Consider the following FI balance sheet (in millions): Assets Liabilities Liquid assets $20 Deposits $1,800 Loans 2,550 Property 330 Interbank borrowings Equity ? 150 Questions a. If stable core...
-
Discuss the impact of environmental stressors, such as temperature fluctuations, nutrient availability, and chemical exposures, on meiotic chromosome dynamics, recombination frequency, and gamete...
-
What is a mortgage crisis?
-
What are the key features of a mortgage?
-
As a financial planner, you are required to give advice and suggestion to your client on the appropriateness of the retirement assets. The appropriateness of the assets will usually depend on how...
-
Show that every group G with identity e and such that x * x = e for all x G is abelian.
-
Is use of the Internet appropriate only for large companies? Explain.
-
Identify the potential barriers (or obstacles) that face companies considering or expanding international marketing operations. Which are the most important and which are less important? Explain.
-
Go to the library and search out print media (i.e., magazine and newspaper) advertising by a company, or one of its products or brands in different countries. Does this company use standardized or...
-
Fill in the Blank. In the finite element method, the solution domain is replaced by several ___________.
-
The simplest form of mass matrix is known as a. lumped-mass matrix b. consistent-mass matrix c. global mass matrix
-
What is a shape function?
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App