Investment Advisors, Inc., is a brokerage firm that manages stock portfolios for a number of clients....
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Investment Advisors, Inc., is a brokerage firm that manages stock portfolios for a number of clients. A particular portfolio consists of U shares of U.S. Oil and H shares of Huber Steel. The annual return for U.S. Oil is $3 per share and the annual return for Huber Steel is $5 per share. U.S. Oil sells for $25 per share and Huber Steel sells for $50 per share. The portfolio has $80,000 to be invested. The portfolio risk index (0.50 per share of U.S. Oil and 0.25 per share for Huber Steel) has a maximum of 700. In addition, the portfolio is limited to a maximum of 1,000 shares of U.S. Oil. The linear programming formulation that will maximize the total annual return of the portfolio is as follows. Maximize total annual return: Funds available Risk maximum U.S. Oil maximum Max 3U + SH 25V + 50H s 80,000 0.500+ 0.25H s 700 10 S 1,000 U. H 20 The computer output is shown below. Optimal Objective Value - 8400.00000 Value Raduced Coat 0.00000 0.00000 Variable U E Variable U E Constraint 800. Slack/Surplus 0.00000 0.00000 200.00000 Obj Coafs RHS Value estimated annual return. $ Dual Value 0.09333 1.33333 0.00000 Allowab Allowable (a) What is the optimal solution, and what is the value of the total annual retum (in s)? U H (b) Which constraints are binding? What is your interpretation of these constraints in terms of the problem? (Select all that apply.) Constraint 1. All funds available are being utilized. Constraint 2. The maximum permissible risk is being incurred. O Constraint 3. All available shares of U.S. Oil are being purchased. None of the constraints are binding. (c) What are the dual values for the constraints? Interpret each. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) constraint 1 O Constraint 1 has a slack of $200. Additional dollars added to the available funds will not improve the total annual return. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 0.09. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 1.33. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 3. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 5. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. constraint 2 O Constraint 2 has a slack of 200. Allowing additional risk will not improve the total annual return. O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 0.09. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09. O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 1.33. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33. O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 3. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3. O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 5. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. constraint 3 O Constraint 3 has a slack of 200 shares. Raising the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil will not improve the total annual return. O Constraint 3 has a dual value of 0.09. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09. O Constraint 3 has a dual value of 1.33. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33. O Constraint 3 has a dual value of 3. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3. O Constraint 3 has a dual value of 5. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. (d) Would it be beneficial to increase the maximum amount invested in U.S. Oil? Why or why not? O Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $1.33. O Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $0.09. O Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $200.00. O No, increasing the maximum shares does not affect the optimal value. Investment Advisors, Inc., is a brokerage firm that manages stock portfolios for a number of clients. A particular portfolio consists of U shares of U.S. Oil and H shares of Huber Steel. The annual return for U.S. Oil is $3 per share and the annual return for Huber Steel is $5 per share. U.S. Oil sells for $25 per share and Huber Steel sells for $50 per share. The portfolio has $80,000 to be invested. The portfolio risk index (0.50 per share of U.S. Oil and 0.25 per share for Huber Steel) has a maximum of 700. In addition, the portfolio is limited to a maximum of 1,000 shares of U.S. Oil. The linear programming formulation that will maximize the total annual return of the portfolio is as follows. Maximize total annual return: Funds available Risk maximum U.S. Oil maximum Max 3U + SH 25V + 50H s 80,000 0.500+ 0.25H s 700 10 S 1,000 U. H 20 The computer output is shown below. Optimal Objective Value - 8400.00000 Value Raduced Coat 0.00000 0.00000 Variable U E Variable U E Constraint 800. Slack/Surplus 0.00000 0.00000 200.00000 Obj Coafs RHS Value estimated annual return. $ Dual Value 0.09333 1.33333 0.00000 Allowab Allowable (a) What is the optimal solution, and what is the value of the total annual retum (in s)? U H (b) Which constraints are binding? What is your interpretation of these constraints in terms of the problem? (Select all that apply.) Constraint 1. All funds available are being utilized. Constraint 2. The maximum permissible risk is being incurred. O Constraint 3. All available shares of U.S. Oil are being purchased. None of the constraints are binding. (c) What are the dual values for the constraints? Interpret each. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) constraint 1 O Constraint 1 has a slack of $200. Additional dollars added to the available funds will not improve the total annual return. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 0.09. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 1.33. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 3. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3. O Constraint 1 has a dual value of 5. If an additional dollar is added to the available funds, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. constraint 2 O Constraint 2 has a slack of 200. Allowing additional risk will not improve the total annual return. O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 0.09. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09. O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 1.33. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33. O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 3. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3. O Constraint 2 has a dual value of 5. If the risk index is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. constraint 3 O Constraint 3 has a slack of 200 shares. Raising the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil will not improve the total annual return. O Constraint 3 has a dual value of 0.09. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $0.09. O Constraint 3 has a dual value of 1.33. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $1.33. O Constraint 3 has a dual value of 3. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $3. O Constraint 3 has a dual value of 5. If the maximum number of shares of U.S. Oil is increased by 1, the total annual return is predicted to increase by $5. (d) Would it be beneficial to increase the maximum amount invested in U.S. Oil? Why or why not? O Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $1.33. O Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $0.09. O Yes, each additional share increases the profit by $200.00. O No, increasing the maximum shares does not affect the optimal value.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
According to the sensitivity report given in the problem answers ... View the full answer
Related Book For
Quantitative Methods for Business
ISBN: 978-0324651751
11th Edition
Authors: David Anderson, Dennis Sweeney, Thomas Williams, Jeffrey cam
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
Investment Advisors, Inc., is a brokerage firm that manages stock portfolios for a number of clients. A particular portfolio consists of U shares of U.S. Oil and H shares of Huber Steel. The annual...
-
Investment Advisors, Inc., is a brokerage firm that manages stock portfolios for a number of clients. A particular portfolio consists of U shares of U.S. Oil and H shares of Huber Steel. The annual...
-
Consider the examples of groupthink explained in this chapter and discuss how they can relate to situations you have experienced on your projects.
-
A steel bar of thickness h, to be used as a beam, is welded to a vertical support by two fillet welds as shown in the figure. (a) Find the safe bending force F if the allowable shear stress in the...
-
The lasagna data discussed in the chapter is repeated in the file 17_24.xlsx. Instead of trying to classify a dependent variable, Have Tried, this file shows the result of clustering. Specifically, a...
-
Kent Oil, a small Texas oil company, holds huge reserves of oil and gas assets. Assume that at the end of 2010, Kent Oils cost of mineral assets totaled approximately $18 million, representing 2.4...
-
Review the data from Great Fender given in Exercise E23- 19. Consider the following additional information: Static budget variable overhead........... $ 5,500 Static budget fixed overhead...
-
ABC Co purchased the following items in year 1: Car Truck Motorcycle Purchase date Dec. 1 01-Aug 30-Sep Purchase Price 75,000 120,000 85,000 Residual Value 5,000 20,000 25,000 7 yrs or 10 yrs or 5...
-
1. Assume a 30% tax rate, and the Totals per financial statements provided. Complete the following schedule as per Figure 16.4. Assume that the Totals per financial statements (second to bottom row)...
-
How would you categorize the risk that slow vaccine roll-out has posed to global trade? (Commercial risk? Country risk? Currency risk? Other risk? etc.) Why?
-
Choose Ubuntu 20 LTS Desktop and explain the brand mechanics. 2.Construct Positioning Bullseye for Ubuntu 20 LTS ?
-
Assume that Bank A receives a deposit of $100 and that the central bank requires all commercial banks to keep 15% of their total deposits on reserve (the required reserve ratio [RRR] is 0.15). How...
-
Solve for u. 1 2 ut 3 5 9 Simplify your answer
-
Coase argues that externalities do not create inefficiencies as long as property rights are clearly established. He notes that the external cost of pollution that is imposed on citizens by a product...
-
If the Fed wants to provide liquidity to a too-big-to-fail financial institution when it otherwise is unable to meet its debt obligations and can cause financial instability, what policy tool should...
-
With the introduction of Disney+, a great deal of discussion has arisen about Disney's history of problematic representation. However, recent films appear to be breaking away from that history in...
-
The activities listed in lines 2125 serve primarily as examples of A) Underappreciated dangers B) Intolerable risks C) Medical priorities D) Policy failures
-
Refer to the Ohio Trust bank location problem introduced in Table shows the counties under consideration and the adjacent counties. TABLE COUNTIES IN THE OHIO TRUST EXPANSION REGION Counties Under...
-
Buckeye Manufacturing produces heads for engines used in the manufacture of trucks. The production line is highly complex, and it measures 900 feet in length. Two types of engine heads are produced...
-
The Statewide Auto Insurance Company developed the following probability distribution for automobile collision claims paid during the past year: Payment ($) Probability 0 ............ 0.83 500...
-
What are the different ways digital technology advancements disrupt the audit function?
-
How can digital technology transform financial reporting from static information provision to active engagement?
-
Identify four changed accounting roles and activities as a result of digital technology advancements.
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App