Jurisdictional issues are often raised in response to questions about the truthfulness of parties regarding domicile, place of injury, and so on. The very doctrine that disallows collusion was developed in response to parties who conspired to circumvent the purpose of procedural laws. It is extremely important that the parties to a suit understand that their ethical obligations are not limited to telling the truth when on the stand, but that these obligations commence with the very first representations to the court about matters as seemingly trivial as one's intended place of permanent residence. The procedural laws pertaining to jurisdiction are firmly embedded and well founded in the rationale of procedural law, and all those who take advantage of the benefits of the legal system are commensurately obligated to follow the system's standards.

What might a person seek to gain by misrepresenting his or her domicile to obtain jurisdiction in a particular court?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Misrepresenting ones domicile to obtain jurisdiction in a particular court can be a strategic move with potential advantages for the individual involv... View the full answer