Lewis writes an editorial in a newspaper claiming that Sinclair, the President of a well known Tech company is a recovering alcoholic. Sinclair sues Lewis and the newspaper for defamation. Af trial evidence is presented that Sinclair has been attending Alcoholics Anonymous meetings for 5 years. The jury returns a verdict in favor of Lewis finding that he did NOT defame Sinclair. Why do you think the jury found there was no defamation?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The jury may have found that there was no defamation because Lewiss statement about Sinclair being a ... View the full answer