Lexington Co. is a U.S.based MNC with subsidiaries in most major countries. Each subsidiary is responsible for forecasting the future exchange rate of its local currency relative to the U.S. dollar. Comment on this policy. How might Lexington Co. ensure consistent forecasts among the different subsidiaries? 

  In August 2001, Woodsen Inc. of Pittsburgh, PA considered the development of a large subsidiary in Greece. In response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the U.S., its expected cash flows and earnings from this acquisition were reduced only slightly. Yet, the firm decided to retract its offer because of an increase in its required rate of return on the project, which caused the NPV to be negative. Explain why the required rate of return on its project may have increased after the attack. 

 

Packer, Inc., a U.S. producer of computer disks, plans to establish a subsidiary in Mexico in order to penetrate the Mexican market. Packer's executives believe that the Mexican peso's value is relatively strong and will weaken against the dollar over time. If their expectations about the peso value are correct, how will this affect the feasibility of the project? Explain.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Comment on the policy of each subsidiary being responsible for forecasting the future exchange rate of its local currency relative to the US dollar by Lexington Co Having each subsidiary responsible f... View the full answer