Locate a Law Society Tribunal decision from any Canadian jurisdiction that was determined between 2021 and 2023. The decision must be one that we have not studied in class. It need not be a disciplinary decision, but the case must deal with one of the ethical issues you have identified. The case may concern either a lawyer or a paralegal. In no more than two paragraphs, explain the relationship between that case and the ethical issue you have identified. Be sure to provide the citation for the case ChatGPT Two Paralegal Rules of Conduct that have been breached in this scenario are as follows: Rule 3 - Duty to Clients: Paralegals have a duty to act in the best interests of their clients and provide competent representation. In this case, Cara failed to act in Abhishek Bannerjee's best interests when she agreed to postpone the motion without obtaining the client's consent. This breaches the duty to act in the client's best interests and provide competent representation. Rule 5 - Duty to the Court and Tribunal: Paralegals must be honest and candid with the court and tribunal. When Cara left a misleading message for her client, stating that the opposing paralegal?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Here is an analysis of a relevant Law Society Tribunal decision from 20212023 that deals with the et... View the full answer