Look at State V. Ulvinen and answer the following questions.

List all the facts after the murder that a jury could infer proved Mrs. Ulvinen participated before or during the murder itself.
 
According to the court, why isn't Mrs. Ulvinen guilty of murder?
 
Do you agree with the court that, however morally reprehensible her behavior, she, nonetheless, wasn't an accomplice? Defend your answer.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

1 After the murder the jury could infer that Mrs Ulvinen a Was aware of her son Davids intent to kill his wife Carol that night b Did not actively dis... View the full answer