MY DISCUSS AND OPINION ABOUT THIS In the case Williams v. Williams , 120 So 2d, 202
Question:
MY DISCUSS AND OPINION ABOUT THIS
In the case Williams v. Williams, 120 So 2d, 202 (Fla 1960), it involves a property in Miami where the Plaintiff with the consent and concurrence of said F. M. Williams expended large sums of money improving said property in the following manner, to wit: The construction of a two bedroom, two baths residence known as 1131 Street, Miami Fliorida. After the death of F.M. Williams the terms of said Last Will and Testament the Plaintiff received alife estate in the heretofore mentioned property, and the Defendants were remaindeman and that the aforementioned residence was substantially completed on or about December 30, 1957, by the Plaintiff, and with funds furnished by the Plaintiff and that said residence constituted a permanent improvement to the aforementioned property in the amount of Thirteen Thousand Five Hundred ($13,000.00) Dollars, and said improvements were made solely with the Plaintiff's funds as well as that in addition to the aforementioned improvements, the Plaintiff has made payments on the principal indebtedness toward an encumbrance against the said property, to wit: First Federal Savings & Loan Association mortgage (Williams v Williams)
The plaintiff wanted reimbursement and the court held that in the will "It is apparent from this that the mortgage encumbrancewas to be paid from any cash remaining after payment of the debts and funeral expenses, by the executrix of the will. The remainder was then devised to thelife tenant and remaindermen" (Williams v Williams).
A Survey of Mathematics with Applications
ISBN: 978-0134112107
10th edition
Authors: Allen R. Angel, Christine D. Abbott, Dennis Runde