Need a one page analysis of this article Divest from Nuclear Weapons Included in the one...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Need a one page analysis of this article Divest from Nuclear Weapons Included in the one page analysis; also need something pertaining to this article from the bible. @ D Divestment is not only a feasible strategy but also a socially responsible and ethically sound way to watch over the money of clients. DIVEST from NUCLEAR WEAPONS Don't Bank On the Bomb Divestment by a few institutions based on the same ethical objection can have a significant impact on a company's strategic direction. B. Wilbert van der Zeiden uclear weapons are unacceptable weapons By design, they aim to cause large scale and long-term damage not only to enemy troops but to civilians as well N Humanity has successfully banned and eliminated less devastating weapons, but cndously we have come to live with the idea that some countries are entitled to keep nuclear weapons. Worse, we have come to accept that their production is nothing to be ashamed of and that investing in these com- panies is sound financial practice Investing in genocide is inexcusable, and it is time we tell our banks, pension funds, and insurance companies to stop financing the bomb. To that end, the Dutch peace organiza- ton PAX for which I'ma senfor researcher, produces an annual report called Don't Bank on the Bomb, providing a detailed overview of financial institutions that invest in com- panies building nuclear weapons. But the report does more: it highlighte positive examples of financial institutions actively divesting from nuclear weapons producers, showing that divestment is not only a fea- sible strategy but also a socially responsible and ethically sound way to watch over the money of clients. Divesting from nuclear weapons is not rocket science. Campaigning for divestment helps to curtail and eliminate nuclear weapons in more than one way. First, it helps to further stigmatize nuclear weapons. Most peo- ple are unaware that their savings help to finance the bomb, and when this is pointed out to them, most people are uneasy or even appalled by the idea. By providing customers with the facts, we stimulate their readiness to take it up with their banks and pension funds and give them notice to divest from these inhumane weapons. This stigmatiza- tion of nuclear weapons is more important than we may think. No weapon has ever been eliminated before it was outlawed. And no weapon is outlawed without first becom- ing stigmatized. Second, divestment can have very direct effect. By convincing financial institutions to move their money elsewhere, we can cut off funds for producing companies-make them feel their business is dirty, unwanted. While it is unlikely that divestment by a single financial institution would create suf- ficient pressure on a company for it to end its involvement in nuclear weapons work, divestment by even a few institutions based on the same ethical objection can have a significant impact on a company's strategic direction. Our sister campaign-Stop Explosive Investments-provides a good example. In that campaign, the focus is divestment from cluster munitions producers, Can you imagine a huge company such as Lockheed NAPO Martin actually paying attention to such a campaign, or ending their work on weap- ons? Well, it did, and the corporation said as much in a letter to PAX: "I hope our ces- sation of the activities in the area of cluster munitions would enable our removal from prohibited investment firms and allow investors to consider Lockheed Martin for inclusion in their portfolios." A $1 trillion industry The nine nuclear-armed states are plan- ning to spend more than $1 trillion over the next decade to maintain and modernize their nuclear weapons. While the major ity of that money comes from taxpayers in the nuclear-armed countries, the Don't Bank on the Bomb report shows that 411 banks, pension funds, and asset managers in 31 countries made $402 billion available between January 2011 and August 2014 to 28 companies that produce, maintain, and modernize nuclear arsenals in France, India, Israel, the United Kingdom, and the a United States. The U.S. is overrepresented here. Roughly two-thirds of all investment in nuclear weapons producers is by U.S. finan- cial institutions. Of the top 10 investors, nine are from the U.S. The top three com- bined-State Street, Capital Group, and Blackrock-have more than $80 billion invested. The U.S. is underrepresented when it comes to positive examples. Of the 35 finan- cial institutions we highlight in our latest report for having a policy curtailing or fully excluding involvement in nuclear weap- ons producers, zero are based in the U.S. It may come as a surprise to U.S. audiences that in several European countries, having a policy prohibiting involvement in nuclear weapons production is actually encour aged. In fact, in countries such as Austria, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, The Achilles' Heel of Terror and Switzerland, banks and pension funds exclude these dirty investments as part of building their image of being a responsi- ble, sensible, and reliable financial service provider. Over the past years, several countries: have started to experiment with regula tion or legislation to end involvement in the production of nuclear weapons. New Zealand, Norway, and Switzerland already have national regulations curtailing the involvement of banks in nuclear weap ons production, and discussions on similar measures are ongoing in Australia, Austria, Germany, Liechtenstein, and Ireland. An international treaty prohibiting nuclear weapons will be needed to fully eliminate them. To get to that prohibition, we need to demonstrate support from the whole of society for a world without nuclear weapons. y for work Don't Bank on the Bomb aids that pro- cess. It allows people to choose better banks, it pushes financial institutions to reconsider their involvement in a potential nuclear Armageddon, and it challenges the accept- ability of companies being involved in the production of weapons that are designed to perform crimes against humanity. DIVEST from TERRORISM Wilbert van der Zeijden is a political sci entist and senior researcher at the Dutch peace organization PAX (paxforpeace. nl). The most recent report can be found at DontBankontheBomb.com. Tackling their finances is perhaps the most effective way of restricting ter- rorist groups. By Rose Marie Berger T he so-called war on terror has dangerous and shifting financial Tront lines, Since the 9/11 attacks, a series of "anti-terrorism financ- ing laws have beemenacted that allow the government to designate certain charities as "terrorist organizations or as financing terror. The government can effectively shut down organizations without ever bringing criminal charges or providing evidence against them, according to the ACLU. "As a result, it reported, "American Muslim organizations and individuals are unfairly targeted In addition to fostering Islamophobia in the large society and fear within Islamic and other faith communities, overzealous application of these laws can actually inhibit the war on terror It risks crippling the very Islamic charities that can effectively com- bat radicalization in places vullnerable to extremists. Stephen Bubb, head of a charity network in Butrin, where financial terror laws are similar to those in the U.S., has emphasized "sensible credible, proportion- ate regulation of Islamic charities. "I have witnessed firsthand the difficulties faced by Need a one page analysis of this article Divest from Nuclear Weapons Included in the one page analysis; also need something pertaining to this article from the bible. @ D Divestment is not only a feasible strategy but also a socially responsible and ethically sound way to watch over the money of clients. DIVEST from NUCLEAR WEAPONS Don't Bank On the Bomb Divestment by a few institutions based on the same ethical objection can have a significant impact on a company's strategic direction. B. Wilbert van der Zeiden uclear weapons are unacceptable weapons By design, they aim to cause large scale and long-term damage not only to enemy troops but to civilians as well N Humanity has successfully banned and eliminated less devastating weapons, but cndously we have come to live with the idea that some countries are entitled to keep nuclear weapons. Worse, we have come to accept that their production is nothing to be ashamed of and that investing in these com- panies is sound financial practice Investing in genocide is inexcusable, and it is time we tell our banks, pension funds, and insurance companies to stop financing the bomb. To that end, the Dutch peace organiza- ton PAX for which I'ma senfor researcher, produces an annual report called Don't Bank on the Bomb, providing a detailed overview of financial institutions that invest in com- panies building nuclear weapons. But the report does more: it highlighte positive examples of financial institutions actively divesting from nuclear weapons producers, showing that divestment is not only a fea- sible strategy but also a socially responsible and ethically sound way to watch over the money of clients. Divesting from nuclear weapons is not rocket science. Campaigning for divestment helps to curtail and eliminate nuclear weapons in more than one way. First, it helps to further stigmatize nuclear weapons. Most peo- ple are unaware that their savings help to finance the bomb, and when this is pointed out to them, most people are uneasy or even appalled by the idea. By providing customers with the facts, we stimulate their readiness to take it up with their banks and pension funds and give them notice to divest from these inhumane weapons. This stigmatiza- tion of nuclear weapons is more important than we may think. No weapon has ever been eliminated before it was outlawed. And no weapon is outlawed without first becom- ing stigmatized. Second, divestment can have very direct effect. By convincing financial institutions to move their money elsewhere, we can cut off funds for producing companies-make them feel their business is dirty, unwanted. While it is unlikely that divestment by a single financial institution would create suf- ficient pressure on a company for it to end its involvement in nuclear weapons work, divestment by even a few institutions based on the same ethical objection can have a significant impact on a company's strategic direction. Our sister campaign-Stop Explosive Investments-provides a good example. In that campaign, the focus is divestment from cluster munitions producers, Can you imagine a huge company such as Lockheed NAPO Martin actually paying attention to such a campaign, or ending their work on weap- ons? Well, it did, and the corporation said as much in a letter to PAX: "I hope our ces- sation of the activities in the area of cluster munitions would enable our removal from prohibited investment firms and allow investors to consider Lockheed Martin for inclusion in their portfolios." A $1 trillion industry The nine nuclear-armed states are plan- ning to spend more than $1 trillion over the next decade to maintain and modernize their nuclear weapons. While the major ity of that money comes from taxpayers in the nuclear-armed countries, the Don't Bank on the Bomb report shows that 411 banks, pension funds, and asset managers in 31 countries made $402 billion available between January 2011 and August 2014 to 28 companies that produce, maintain, and modernize nuclear arsenals in France, India, Israel, the United Kingdom, and the a United States. The U.S. is overrepresented here. Roughly two-thirds of all investment in nuclear weapons producers is by U.S. finan- cial institutions. Of the top 10 investors, nine are from the U.S. The top three com- bined-State Street, Capital Group, and Blackrock-have more than $80 billion invested. The U.S. is underrepresented when it comes to positive examples. Of the 35 finan- cial institutions we highlight in our latest report for having a policy curtailing or fully excluding involvement in nuclear weap- ons producers, zero are based in the U.S. It may come as a surprise to U.S. audiences that in several European countries, having a policy prohibiting involvement in nuclear weapons production is actually encour aged. In fact, in countries such as Austria, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, The Achilles' Heel of Terror and Switzerland, banks and pension funds exclude these dirty investments as part of building their image of being a responsi- ble, sensible, and reliable financial service provider. Over the past years, several countries: have started to experiment with regula tion or legislation to end involvement in the production of nuclear weapons. New Zealand, Norway, and Switzerland already have national regulations curtailing the involvement of banks in nuclear weap ons production, and discussions on similar measures are ongoing in Australia, Austria, Germany, Liechtenstein, and Ireland. An international treaty prohibiting nuclear weapons will be needed to fully eliminate them. To get to that prohibition, we need to demonstrate support from the whole of society for a world without nuclear weapons. y for work Don't Bank on the Bomb aids that pro- cess. It allows people to choose better banks, it pushes financial institutions to reconsider their involvement in a potential nuclear Armageddon, and it challenges the accept- ability of companies being involved in the production of weapons that are designed to perform crimes against humanity. DIVEST from TERRORISM Wilbert van der Zeijden is a political sci entist and senior researcher at the Dutch peace organization PAX (paxforpeace. nl). The most recent report can be found at DontBankontheBomb.com. Tackling their finances is perhaps the most effective way of restricting ter- rorist groups. By Rose Marie Berger T he so-called war on terror has dangerous and shifting financial Tront lines, Since the 9/11 attacks, a series of "anti-terrorism financ- ing laws have beemenacted that allow the government to designate certain charities as "terrorist organizations or as financing terror. The government can effectively shut down organizations without ever bringing criminal charges or providing evidence against them, according to the ACLU. "As a result, it reported, "American Muslim organizations and individuals are unfairly targeted In addition to fostering Islamophobia in the large society and fear within Islamic and other faith communities, overzealous application of these laws can actually inhibit the war on terror It risks crippling the very Islamic charities that can effectively com- bat radicalization in places vullnerable to extremists. Stephen Bubb, head of a charity network in Butrin, where financial terror laws are similar to those in the U.S., has emphasized "sensible credible, proportion- ate regulation of Islamic charities. "I have witnessed firsthand the difficulties faced by
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
MALACHI 41 For behold the day cometh that shall burn as an oven and all the proud yea and all that d... View the full answer
Related Book For
Income Tax Fundamentals 2013
ISBN: 9781285586618
31st Edition
Authors: Gerald E. Whittenburg, Martha Altus Buller, Steven L Gill
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these business communication questions
-
Planning is one of the most important management functions in any business. A front office managers first step in planning should involve determine the departments goals. Planning also includes...
-
Managing Scope Changes Case Study Scope changes on a project can occur regardless of how well the project is planned or executed. Scope changes can be the result of something that was omitted during...
-
The Crazy Eddie fraud may appear smaller and gentler than the massive billion-dollar frauds exposed in recent times, such as Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme, frauds in the subprime mortgage market, the...
-
Calculate the indirect quotations for Euros and Kronor.
-
Consider the argument that in the modern world of large-scale, short-term international capital movements, the ability of individual countries to affect their exchange rate is very limited.
-
In the manufacture of its main product, the Washington Company produces a by-product. Joint production cost incurred to the point of separation totals $200,000. After separation, cost of $ 150,000 is...
-
The following transactions occurred for Advanced Engineering: Requirement 1.Record the transactions in the journal. Sep 2 5 10 12 19 21 27 Paid utilities expense of $300. Purchased equipment on...
-
On January 1, 2015, a city entered into the following leases for equipment items. Each of the leases qualifies as a capital lease. Initial payments are on December 31, 2015. An interest rate of 12...
-
- Report about Stakeholder vs. stockholder in corporate finance Corporate outcomes include, but are not limited to, revenue, productivity, valuation, innovation, financing costs, etc.
-
The proposed rates were not in the range the CEO expected given the pricing analysis. The CEO has asked the pricing actuary to verify the total projected loss cost excluding potential large storm...
-
A tells his wife that he would commit suicide if she did not transfer her personal assets to him. She does so under this threat. Can the wife avoid the contract?
-
Air is forced through holes that are bored through a 0.5-m-thick block of solid (of molecular weight \(95 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{kmol}\) ) that sublimates into the flowing air. Consider air at \(320...
-
For the conditions of Problem 8.70, how long must the annulus be if the water flow rate is \(0.35 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) instead of \(0.02 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{s}\) ? Data From Problem 8.70:-...
-
A square aluminum plate \(5 \mathrm{~mm}\) thick and \(150 \mathrm{~mm}\) on a side is heated while vertically suspended in quiescent air at \(75^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Determine the average heat...
-
When the Otis Elevator Company introduced the change described in Example 1.1, there was a lot of resistance from the various heads of the European subsidiaries. Why? What arguments do you think the...
-
Show that the laminar, free convection correlations for a vertical, isothermal flat plate of height \(L\) can be applied to a vertical, isothermal cylinder of diameter \(D\) and height \(L\) if the...
-
2. Determine the word bond graph for a rear-drive vehicle (see textbook), basic components of the drivetrain are the engine, transmission, driveshaft, differential, and wheels. The wheels convert...
-
Parkin Industries, a U.S. company, acquired a wholly-owned subsidiary, located in Italy, at the beginning of the current year, for 200,000. The subsidiary's functional currency is the euro. The...
-
Bea Jones (age 32) moved from Texas to Florida in December 2011. She lives at 654 Ocean Way, Gulfport, FL 33707. Bea's Social Security number is 466-78-7359 and she is single. Her earnings and income...
-
In the 2012 tax year, Michelle paid the following amounts relating to her 2010 tax return: Tax deficiency..........................................$5,000 Negligence...
-
Leslie and Leon Lazo are married and file a joint return for 2012. Leslie's Social Security number is 466-47-3311 and Leon's is 467-74-4451. They live at 143 Snapdragon Drive, Reno, NV 82102. For...
-
In order to have a correlation coefficient between traits A and B, it is necessary to have: a. one group of subjects, some of whom possess characteristics of trait A, the remainder possessing those...
-
What would you guess the value of the correlation coefficient to be for the pair of variables: "number of man-hours worked" and "number of units of work completed"? a. Approximately 0.9 b....
-
True or False: Whenever r is calculated on the basis of a sample, the value which we obtain for r is only an estimate of the true correlation coefficient which we would obtain if we calculated it for...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App