Parham v. J.R.: Why does Justice Brennan, in his opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, disagree with the majority? What safeguards does he believe are constitutionally required before a state social worker acting in the place of a parent of a child who is a ward of the State may admit the child to a mental health institution? How do these safeguards differ from those that he believes are constitutionally required when a parent is seeking to admit a child to a mental health hospital

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

In the 1979 case Parham v JR Justice Brennans main point of disagreement with the majority concerned ... View the full answer