Please answer these questions with some detail :)

Question 1. What is the significance of the insurer providing its insureds with maps showing that the Rocky Point area is within 48 statute miles of the U.S. border?

Question 2. Would your answer to the preceding question be different if Jerry testified that not only was he unaware of the maps issued by his insurer, but he was also unaware at the time of the accident that he had cover-age for medical payment expenses and UM in Mexico?

Question 3. How do the insurer's actions in obtaining an expert to determine the location of the accident affect your analysis of whether bad faith has been committed?

Question 4. What type of agreement could Dick enter into with Jerry upon denial by Dick's insurer that he had liability coverage for the accident?