Question 2 What is wrong with the argument claiming to prove the following assertion. You should...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Question 2 What is wrong with the argument claiming to prove the following assertion. You should not only find the error, but explain why it is an error providing an example. Assertion: For any two numbers a and 3 define max(a. 3) to be the largest of a er 3. If f and g are continuous at: then so is the function max(f.9) defined by max(f.g)(x) = max(f(r).g(z)). Proof: According to Definition 2.4.1 it must be shown that lim max(f.g)(x) = max(f.g)(=). According to Definition 2.2.1, in order to show this, it must be shown that for every > 0 there is some 6>0 such that max(f.g)(x)-max(f.g)(=) < whenever 0 <=-2 <6. So let e> 0 be arbitrary. By the definition of max(f.g)(=)= max(f(=).g(=)) it must be the case that either max(f.g)(=) = f(=) or max(f.g)(=) = g(=) Only the first case will be considered since the argument in the second case is identical. If max (f. 9) (=) = f(=) then there must be some non-empty interval (=-p.=+p) such that max (f.g)(x) = f(x) (1) Juris Steprins 2022. Permission to make digital or hand copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. All other use is prohibited. whenever 0 <-<6". Now let & be the minimum of 6 and p. Then if 0<-< it follows that (2) for all z such that :-p<r<:+p. Since f is continuous at : it follows by Definition 2.4.1 that lim f(x) = f(=) and by Definition 2.2.1 that there is some >0 such that If(x)-f(=)| << as required. =-p<z<=+p and so from (1) that max(f.g)(r) = f(r). But also 0<-<6 and so it follows from (3) that f(x)-f(=) < Combining (1), (2) and (3) yields that [max(f.g)(r)-max(f.9)(=) < Question 3 Find the two errors in the following argument purporting to prove the following version of Theorem 2.5.1. As always, an explanation is required. (One of the errors is an error of logic, while the other error is more of a typo.) Assertion: Let p>0. Suppose that for all z such that 0</z-c<p h(x) < f(x) < g(x). If lim h(r) = H and lim g(x)=G and lim f(x)= F and H<G then H< F<G. E-K THE Proof: Proceed to prove this by contradiction. So suppose that it fails to be the case that H< F<G. There are two possibilities. The first is that G<F. In this case let <= (F-G)/2 and note that e > 0. Since lim g(x)= G it follows from Definition 2.2.1 that there is some 5, such that (g(x)-G]<for all z such that 0<r-cl<8₁. Similarly, since lim f(r) - F there is some 8, such that f(x)-F<for all z such that 0<\-c|< 8₂. But then let z be such that 0<|r-c<min{p, 6₂,6₂) and observe that f(x) > F-<=F-(F-G)/2=F/2+G/2=G+(F-G)/2=G+*>g(z) and this contradicts that f(x) < g(x) since 0<-<p The other possibility is that F<H. The argument in this case is similar to that of the first. Let <= (H-F)/2 and note that >0 as before. Again using Definition 2.2.1 and lim A(z)= H there is some 6, such that h(r)-H|< for all z such that 0<jr-c< 6₂ and, since lim f(2)= F there is some & such that f(z)-F< for all z such that 0<-<6₂. But then, once again, let z be such that 0<r- <min(p.6₂.6₂} and observe that f(x) <F=e=F+(H-F)/2= F/2+H/2=H-(H-F)/2=H-e<h(z) and this contradicts that h(z) <f(z) since 0</z-d<p The contradiction in both cases establishes the assertion. Question 4 Formulate a correct version of the assertion from Question 3 and prove it. The key here is to correct the error of logic and to realize the small, but critical, change it requires to be made to the statement. Once you have found the typo, that is easily corrected. Question 2 What is wrong with the argument claiming to prove the following assertion. You should not only find the error, but explain why it is an error providing an example. Assertion: For any two numbers a and 3 define max(a. 3) to be the largest of a er 3. If f and g are continuous at: then so is the function max(f.9) defined by max(f.g)(x) = max(f(r).g(z)). Proof: According to Definition 2.4.1 it must be shown that lim max(f.g)(x) = max(f.g)(=). According to Definition 2.2.1, in order to show this, it must be shown that for every > 0 there is some 6>0 such that max(f.g)(x)-max(f.g)(=) < whenever 0 <=-2 <6. So let e> 0 be arbitrary. By the definition of max(f.g)(=)= max(f(=).g(=)) it must be the case that either max(f.g)(=) = f(=) or max(f.g)(=) = g(=) Only the first case will be considered since the argument in the second case is identical. If max (f. 9) (=) = f(=) then there must be some non-empty interval (=-p.=+p) such that max (f.g)(x) = f(x) (1) Juris Steprins 2022. Permission to make digital or hand copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. All other use is prohibited. whenever 0 <-<6". Now let & be the minimum of 6 and p. Then if 0<-< it follows that (2) for all z such that :-p<r<:+p. Since f is continuous at : it follows by Definition 2.4.1 that lim f(x) = f(=) and by Definition 2.2.1 that there is some >0 such that If(x)-f(=)| << as required. =-p<z<=+p and so from (1) that max(f.g)(r) = f(r). But also 0<-<6 and so it follows from (3) that f(x)-f(=) < Combining (1), (2) and (3) yields that [max(f.g)(r)-max(f.9)(=) < Question 3 Find the two errors in the following argument purporting to prove the following version of Theorem 2.5.1. As always, an explanation is required. (One of the errors is an error of logic, while the other error is more of a typo.) Assertion: Let p>0. Suppose that for all z such that 0</z-c<p h(x) < f(x) < g(x). If lim h(r) = H and lim g(x)=G and lim f(x)= F and H<G then H< F<G. E-K THE Proof: Proceed to prove this by contradiction. So suppose that it fails to be the case that H< F<G. There are two possibilities. The first is that G<F. In this case let <= (F-G)/2 and note that e > 0. Since lim g(x)= G it follows from Definition 2.2.1 that there is some 5, such that (g(x)-G]<for all z such that 0<r-cl<8₁. Similarly, since lim f(r) - F there is some 8, such that f(x)-F<for all z such that 0<\-c|< 8₂. But then let z be such that 0<|r-c<min{p, 6₂,6₂) and observe that f(x) > F-<=F-(F-G)/2=F/2+G/2=G+(F-G)/2=G+*>g(z) and this contradicts that f(x) < g(x) since 0<-<p The other possibility is that F<H. The argument in this case is similar to that of the first. Let <= (H-F)/2 and note that >0 as before. Again using Definition 2.2.1 and lim A(z)= H there is some 6, such that h(r)-H|< for all z such that 0<jr-c< 6₂ and, since lim f(2)= F there is some & such that f(z)-F< for all z such that 0<-<6₂. But then, once again, let z be such that 0<r- <min(p.6₂.6₂} and observe that f(x) <F=e=F+(H-F)/2= F/2+H/2=H-(H-F)/2=H-e<h(z) and this contradicts that h(z) <f(z) since 0</z-d<p The contradiction in both cases establishes the assertion. Question 4 Formulate a correct version of the assertion from Question 3 and prove it. The key here is to correct the error of logic and to realize the small, but critical, change it requires to be made to the statement. Once you have found the typo, that is easily corrected.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
Step 12 The functions f and g are continuous at z is gi... View the full answer
Related Book For
Introduction to Operations Research
ISBN: 978-1259162985
10th edition
Authors: Frederick S. Hillier, Gerald J. Lieberman
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
What is wrong with the following statement? Given any two objects, the one with the higher temperature contains more heat.
-
What is wrong with the following calculation? (Guido Ubaldus thought that this proved the existence of God because something has been created out of nothing.) 0 = 0 +0 + 0 +.. - (1 - 1) + (1 1) + (1...
-
What is wrong with the equation? a. b. /3
-
Income statements for the current year and one year ago follow. Assume that all sales are on credit. For Year Ended December 31 Sales Cost of goods sold Other operating expenses Interest expense...
-
The partners who own Jefferson Canoes Co. wished to avoid the unlimited personal liability of the partnership form of business, so they incorporated as Jefferson Canoes, Inc. The charter from the...
-
A loop of wire is connected to the terminals of a battery, as indicated in FIGURE 22-51. If the loop is to attract the bar magnet which of the terminals, A or B, should be the positive terminal of...
-
Can you conclude that the quality varies among shifts? Use the = 0.01 level of significance. Exercises 79 refer to the following data: At an assembly plant for light trucks, routine monitoring of...
-
Jameson is a 32-year-old father of three who thought he had finally found a career. While working as an assistant manager at a local shoe store, a customer, Vijay, befriended Jameson and invited him...
-
Question 1. (3) A sprocket is to be manufactured per specifications and dimensions provided in Figure 1 and Table 1. Sketch the sprocket through AutoCAD or Solidworks, and ensure that you present...
-
The Purchases Ledger Control Accounts of Pfozer, a private company, for the month of January 2018 was prepared as shown below: Cash paid to suppliers Discount received Balance c/f Purchases Ledger...
-
QUESTION 1: PAKEL Tool Company is located in one of the Multi-Facility Economic Zone (MFEZ) in Zambia. The Company has been in existence for over five years and has a policy of building an excellent...
-
7x +15x+22 x+3x-2 Determine all the horizontal asymptotes of the graph of f(x) = -
-
Define diversity and explain why diversity is important to our society? Define cultural diversity and explain why cultural diversity is just as important? How might the lack of diversity affect...
-
Simplify the following expression : 3 COS -+x 2
-
What is biometric access control system and why is it important for a security company to have? What are the liabilities and limitations associated with the security system and what is the cost...
-
At the beginning of the year, Mitt Corporation bought machinery, shelving, and a forklift. The machinery initially cost $ 3 0 , 8 0 0 but had to be overhauled ( at a cost of $ 2 , 2 4 0 ) before it...
-
Which statement is correct regarding accounts receivable (A/R)? a. A low number of days in A/R typically indicates successful revenue cycle management. b. A high number of days in A/R typically...
-
Create a data model for one of the processes in the end-of-chapter Exercises for Chapter 4. Explain how you would balance the data model and process model.
-
The following data relate road width x and accident frequency y. Road width (in feet) was treated as the independent variable, and values y of the random variable Y, in accidents per 108 vehicle...
-
The McAllister Company factory currently has two tool cribs, each with a single clerk, in its manufacturing area. One tool crib handles only the tools for the heavy machinery; the second one handles...
-
Use parametric linear programming to find an optimal solution for the following problem as a function of , for 0 30. Maximize Z () = 5x1 + 6x2 + 4x3 + 7x4, Subject to and xj 0, for j = 1, 2, 3,...
-
Batra Company sold \($1,500,000\) of five-year, 12% bonds on 1 August 20X2. Additional information on the bond issue is as follows: Required: 1. Record the bond issuance on 1 August 20X2. 2. Prepare...
-
On l May 20X9, Nahal imports Limited (NIL) obtained a five-year loan from a major New York bank. The loan is for US\($13,000,000,\) bears interest at 5% per annum (paid annually on the loan...
-
The following report was prepared by M. Salvemini, CPA, to accompany unaudited financial statements: We have prepared the statement of net worth, dated November 30, 19X1, that is attached hereto....
The 20th Victim The New Womens Murder Club Thriller And Maxine Paetro - ISBN: 0316494941 - Free Book
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App