Read the following cases and then answer the questions below.

Cases:

• Goddard v. Boston M.R. Co., 60 N.E. 486 (Mass. 1901)
• Anjou v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co.,94 N.E. 386 (Mass. 1911)
• Mascary v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co.,155 N.E. 637 (Mass. 1927)
• Scaccia v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co., 57 N.E.2d 761 (Mass. 1944)

Answer the following questions:

1. After you read each case, fill in the following rule synthesis chart:

Case Name/Citation	Relevant Facts of Case	RULE	Outcome

1. Synthesize all four cases and provide a rule statement that you would be able to apply to all four cases.
2. Apply your rule statement to the following hypothetical and predict whether or not Sandy Banks can recover for the injury at Faneuil Hall using the IRAC method:
   1. What is the issue in this hypothetical?
   2. What is the Rule to be applied?
   3. Apply the facts of the hypothetical to the rule stated.
   4. What is your conclusion? Do you think that Sandy Banks will recover for the injury?
3. Hypothetical:

Sandy Banks was excited to visit the historic sites of Boston. Upon arriving in the city Sandy went immediately to Faneuil Hall, even though it was 4:30 in the morning. Sandy went to the main entrance, saw that the shops were closed, but wandered around the building, gazing and pondering the meaning of history. Sandy then slipped and fell. Although in great pain, Sandy looked around and spotted a brown, leathery banana peel, six inches in length, lying on the gray, slate floor.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Heres the completed rule synthesis chart for each of the provided cases Case NameCitation Goddard v Boston MR Co 60 NE 486 Mass 1901Relevant Facts of ... View the full answer