Read the Montreal Convention (https://file.io/LjfIFJNangwn) to understand strict liability and presumptive liability (Article 21). In particular, also pay attention to Article 29 which restricts that all remedies damages have to be claimed under this Convention and its exclusion of the applicability of tort laws.

1. Explain what is meant by "strict liability" in the Montreal Convention. Illustrate the application of strict liability by giving at least two examples where strict liability is applicable and one example that it is not.

2. The inclusion of strict liability and presumed liability in Montreal Convention comes with the setting of limits for claims and the exclusion of using tort laws. Articulate the pro and con for this arrangement. You may use examples to illustrate how this could be an advantage or disadvantage to the passenger seeking remedy to damages. State you view on whether you support this arrangement or not with rationale.

3. Recommend measures that could be included in Montreal Convention for better passenger protection and still remain equitable to the airlines.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Answer 1 Strict Liability in the Montreal Convention Strict liability in the Montreal Convention means that airlines are liable for damages to passengers and their baggage without the need to prove fa... View the full answer