Requirements of the legislation are not satisfied: Based on the information provided, SA was not denied...

Transcribed Image Text:

Requirements of the legislation are not satisfied: Based on the information provided, SA was not denied at least two participation opportunities. The purpose of extension legislation is to ensure four seasons of participation opportunity. In order for an SA to receive an extension, an institution must demonstrate SA was denied at least two participation opportunities for reasons beyond the control of SA and institution, resulting in SA not having four participation opportunities. In this case, SA had at least five participation opportunities including the 2018 fall semester and 2021-22 academic year when he competed, and the 2022 fall semester when he intends to compete. In addition, the 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2019-20 academic years are considered participation opportunities given SA enrolled at institutions that sponsored his sport and chose note to compete, which is a circumstance within control of the student-athlete and a legislated participation opportunity. Finally, Institution No. 4 was unable to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances existed to warrant approving waiver. Case precedent: If you accept this decision, click "I Accept" below. Once you accept the decision the case will be closed. Do not click "I Accept" if your institution intends to appeal the decision. An appeal must be submitted within 30 days of the decision issued date and shall be submitted via the case "Withdraw/Appeal/Reconsideration" tab. Requirements of the legislation are not satisfied: Based on the information provided, SA was not denied at least two participation opportunities. The purpose of extension legislation is to ensure four seasons of participation opportunity. In order for an SA to receive an extension, an institution must demonstrate SA was denied at least two participation opportunities for reasons beyond the control of SA and institution, resulting in SA not having four participation opportunities. In this case, SA had at least five participation opportunities including the 2018 fall semester and 2021-22 academic year when he competed, and the 2022 fall semester when he intends to compete. In addition, the 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2019-20 academic years are considered participation opportunities given SA enrolled at institutions that sponsored his sport and chose note to compete, which is a circumstance within control of the student-athlete and a legislated participation opportunity. Finally, Institution No. 4 was unable to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances existed to warrant approving waiver. Case precedent: If you accept this decision, click "I Accept" below. Once you accept the decision the case will be closed. Do not click "I Accept" if your institution intends to appeal the decision. An appeal must be submitted within 30 days of the decision issued date and shall be submitted via the case "Withdraw/Appeal/Reconsideration" tab.

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Introduction The organization can ask the resistance to various judgment committees or subcommittees to review a prior decision regarding the new necessary information that has not been reasonably kno... View the full answer