Seth is not obligated to sell. One may assume that this would be considered a valid contract
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Seth is not obligated to sell. One may assume that this would be considered a valid contract using the statue of frauds clause under the UCC. A signed document was sent by Nina and Seth did not decline the offer. The uniform commercial code states that the price asked must be reasonable. Selling a car at 30% below blue book value is not a reasonable price. This contract is not valid.
Do you think this person is correct? explain
Related Book For
Smith and Roberson Business Law
ISBN: 978-0538473637
15th Edition
Authors: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Posted Date: