Strict liability in product liability is a theory that ascribes complete liability even without fault to one who manufactures or sells ultra-hazardous materials such as high explosives. This liability exists even in the complete absence of any proof of fault whenever another person or persons suffers harm from the material. Is this theory sound? What arguments can be made to set forth the proposition that this is too far and too broad a responsibility to bear?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The soundness of strict liability in product liability is a matter of legal debate Critics argue that it may impose an undue burden on manufacturers p... View the full answer