Subject-experimental psychology

https://rutgers.instructure.com/courses/226423/files/27890971?verifier=8ckSyL7RsrqewwUkUnsXVx1Uy41oYKQwdPicbHt5&wrap=1

usung the link above watch and tell me your input

• What isthe Texas Sharp Shooter Fallacy?
• How does it relate it to cancer clusters?
• Why is it important to formulate a specific hypothesis before you conduct an experiment?
• Question 2

Topic Multiple Comparisons Fallacy

3)What does it mean to have a statistically significant effect with p < .05?

• 4)imagine that we conduct the same extrasensory perception experiment 100 times. so the results are randonm If our p-value cut-off is .05, how many times would i expect the experiment to produce a statistically significant result? Explain.
• 5)Imagine 100 independent researchers each conducting an experiment on ESP. Using the .05 cut-off for p-values, how many researchers would I expect to obtain a statistically significant result. Which ones would be most likely to publish their results (and get media attention)?
• 6)examined 100 variables and that they used a p-value of .05. If transmission lines have no effect whatsoever on health, how many statistically significant correlations should they expect to find? What should the Swedish researchers have done to make their findings credible?