The public image of business in the latter part of the nineteenth century was hardly flattering...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
The public image of business in the latter part of the nineteenth century was hardly flattering The adventures of so-called "Robber Barons" constantly made the headlines and their exploits matched those of their contemporaries in the Wild West. For ex- ample, J. P. Morgan hired an army of toughs to literally battle for a section of rail- road near Binghamton, New York. And business leaders often expressed their con- tempt for the public interest, exemplified by such infamous comments as W. H. Vanderbilt's "the public be damned" and J. P. Morgan's "lowe the public nothing." Recent research suggests that these individuals were probably not the villains they were portrayed to be, though it is undeniable that they wielded enormous power. It was precisely during the era of these powerful business leaders that Harold Cole founded Fort Greenwold (FG), a firm that is currently one of the largest producers of paper and pulp with annual sales of $3.5 billion. Cole located his first plant in a rural town in New England, partly to create jobs for the many un- employed workers in the area. "Having a heart does not mean you can't make a buck." Harold was fond of saying. The firm has always been active in the af- fairs of the community and donates generously to local civic and charitable or ganizations. It also takes special pride in promoting a family atmosphere among its employees. Personnel experts believe that these policies are largely responsi- ble for the enviable productivity record of FG's workers. For its first 80 years FG had an impressive record of growth in earnings and sales. But as the company grew, the willingness of top-level management to de- centralize and delegate authority did not. The company stagnated until the ap- pointment of Andy Kurzer as chairman eight years ago in 1988 Kurzer was shocked at the "nickel-and-dime stuff" that reached corporate headquarters, and he moved quickly to decentralize authority. One major change involved the company's capital budgeting procedures. FC actually had no formal mecha- nism for capital projects Kurzer changed this and set up a six-person expendi- tures committee (EC) that would decide projects costing more than $200,000. Smaller expenditures would be decided at the regional and local levels. Ooredoo PART V CAPITAL BUDGETING 11:30 AM euruni.online @ 55% At present (1996) the EC is considering two alternatives for achieving a much-needed increase in the firm's production capacity. One option involves modernizing an existing mill in Lees Point, North Carolina. If the plant is not renovated in the near future, production would drop to 600 tons per day and the yearly cash flow would be $11,422.320. (See Exhibit 1 for more complete infor- mation). The other alternative is to build a new mill at Midtown, North Carolina, which is 15 miles from Lees Point. Barbara Wadkins, a member of the EC, was responsible for estimating the cost and yearly cash flows from building the new paper mill at Midtown. She calculated the cost to be 5618.8 million net of any tax considerations and in- cluding working capital, and estimated the yearly after-tax cash flow to be $107,728,000. Exhibit 2 presents the information used to determine these fig- ures. All committee members agree that these numbers are "quite reason- able." CONTROVERSY The figures on modernizing the existing facility at Lees Point are more con- troversial, however. Information on this project was originally sent by the management of the Lees Point plant and is also presented in Exhibit 2. The controversy centers on the estimated tonnage per day of the plant and its per- unit variable cost. Wadkins politely pointed out that it would be "extremely difficult for an old facility like the one at Lees Point to achieve output of 1,600 tons per day." In contrast to Wadkins's mild reaction was Kurzer's angry re- sponse. "You can forget it! I'll be the NBA's MVP before that plant puts out that tonnage!" Everyone on the EC knew what the problem was. Management is from Lees Point and is worried that a new facility will reduce jobs. "I don't know why I got so angry. I should expect an estimate like this," said Kurzer. After much discus- sion the committee unanimously agreed that 1,200 tons per day was much more accurate and, if anything, a bit optimistic. It was also decided that a per-unit variable cost of $282.1 per ton was appropriate instead of the original figure of $263.9 per ton. With these changes the yearly cash flow after taxes was estimated to be $40,634,680; this was considerably lower than the projection of $61,863,160 based on the figures sent by Lees Point management. MORE CONTROVERSY Both projects are assumed to last 20 years. This is a relatively long time horizon for a capital budgeting project, but the company feels a paper mill is unlikely to become technologically obsolete since paper production techniques have changed very little in the last century. At least one EC member, however, thinks Ooredoo 11:30 AM euruni.online @ 55% CASE 20 FORT GREENWOLD 125 that a 20-year period is too long for the "modernize-the-old" option. Past expe- rience, he argues, indicates that revitalizing an existing facility will rarely extend its life that much, and 15 years seems more probable. If so, he wonders if "we aren't being extremely charitable to the Lees Point plant. By my calculations, as- suming a 20-year time horizon for this project adds $40,634,680 times 5 or $203,173,400 to the total yearly cash flows. That's some largesse!" The rest of the committee concedes that 20 years may be a bit long, but decides to retain this time period as a working hypothesis. EMPLOYEE CONCERNS Some EC members are worried about the impact on employee morale if the fac- tory is relocated. "Apparently," says Wadkins, "there is considerable opposition to closing down the old factory, judging from the inaccurate figures we re- ceived." It is noted, however, that the move will "most certainly" not cost any- one a job, but will, in fact, create new positions, including some relatively high- paying managerial ones. Nonetheless, it was obvious that the proposed relocation would impose costs on the employees. Many would either have to re- locate to Midtown or face a 30-mile round trip daily commute. Wadkins won- dered if it "was fair and appropriate" to ask the employees to bear such costs, especially in light of the remarkable loyalty the Lees Point employees had shown to the company. She notes that a large proportion of the employees have worked for FG for more than 10 years. "One thing is clear," remarks a subdued Kurzer. "If we choose to relocate the plant, it is important that it does not appear to be some type of ivory-tower de- cision that would be inconsistent with the management philosophy we've pro- moted all these years. Barbara, I am sensitive to the issues you bring up. Employee morale and employee loyalty are very important considerations. Maybe we could work something out-you know, like some type of moving al- lowance." Kurzer also reminded the committee that Midtown was the closest suitable site to Lees Point should the company move. QUESTIONS 1. (a) Calculate the NPV of modernizing the existing paper mill. (b) Calculate the NPV of building a new paper mill. 2. (a) Calculate the IRR of each investment. (b) Calculate the payback of each. 3. (a) Do the NPV and IRR methods give the same accept/reject signals? (b) Explain why the NPV and IRR methods can give divergent signals when evaluating mutually exclusive alternatives. CAPITAL BUDGETING 4. Suppose that the appropriate life of a modernized factory is 15 instead of 20 years. Evaluate the argument that "assuming a 20-year time horizon for this project adds $40,634,680 times 5 or $203,173,400 to the yearly cash flows." 5. Based on your calculations in the previous questions and information in the case, what decision do you recommend? Justify your choice. 6. (a) Building a new mill requires $464.1 million more than modernizing the old mill but will generate an extra $67,093,320 in yearly cash flow. Calculate the IRR on this incremental expenditure. Compare your an- swer to the 12 percent required return. (b) Based on your answer in part (a), suggest a decision rule for the IRR in evaluating mutually exclusive alternatives with different initial costs. The public image of business in the latter part of the nineteenth century was hardly flattering The adventures of so-called "Robber Barons" constantly made the headlines and their exploits matched those of their contemporaries in the Wild West. For ex- ample, J. P. Morgan hired an army of toughs to literally battle for a section of rail- road near Binghamton, New York. And business leaders often expressed their con- tempt for the public interest, exemplified by such infamous comments as W. H. Vanderbilt's "the public be damned" and J. P. Morgan's "lowe the public nothing." Recent research suggests that these individuals were probably not the villains they were portrayed to be, though it is undeniable that they wielded enormous power. It was precisely during the era of these powerful business leaders that Harold Cole founded Fort Greenwold (FG), a firm that is currently one of the largest producers of paper and pulp with annual sales of $3.5 billion. Cole located his first plant in a rural town in New England, partly to create jobs for the many un- employed workers in the area. "Having a heart does not mean you can't make a buck." Harold was fond of saying. The firm has always been active in the af- fairs of the community and donates generously to local civic and charitable or ganizations. It also takes special pride in promoting a family atmosphere among its employees. Personnel experts believe that these policies are largely responsi- ble for the enviable productivity record of FG's workers. For its first 80 years FG had an impressive record of growth in earnings and sales. But as the company grew, the willingness of top-level management to de- centralize and delegate authority did not. The company stagnated until the ap- pointment of Andy Kurzer as chairman eight years ago in 1988 Kurzer was shocked at the "nickel-and-dime stuff" that reached corporate headquarters, and he moved quickly to decentralize authority. One major change involved the company's capital budgeting procedures. FC actually had no formal mecha- nism for capital projects Kurzer changed this and set up a six-person expendi- tures committee (EC) that would decide projects costing more than $200,000. Smaller expenditures would be decided at the regional and local levels. Ooredoo PART V CAPITAL BUDGETING 11:30 AM euruni.online @ 55% At present (1996) the EC is considering two alternatives for achieving a much-needed increase in the firm's production capacity. One option involves modernizing an existing mill in Lees Point, North Carolina. If the plant is not renovated in the near future, production would drop to 600 tons per day and the yearly cash flow would be $11,422.320. (See Exhibit 1 for more complete infor- mation). The other alternative is to build a new mill at Midtown, North Carolina, which is 15 miles from Lees Point. Barbara Wadkins, a member of the EC, was responsible for estimating the cost and yearly cash flows from building the new paper mill at Midtown. She calculated the cost to be 5618.8 million net of any tax considerations and in- cluding working capital, and estimated the yearly after-tax cash flow to be $107,728,000. Exhibit 2 presents the information used to determine these fig- ures. All committee members agree that these numbers are "quite reason- able." CONTROVERSY The figures on modernizing the existing facility at Lees Point are more con- troversial, however. Information on this project was originally sent by the management of the Lees Point plant and is also presented in Exhibit 2. The controversy centers on the estimated tonnage per day of the plant and its per- unit variable cost. Wadkins politely pointed out that it would be "extremely difficult for an old facility like the one at Lees Point to achieve output of 1,600 tons per day." In contrast to Wadkins's mild reaction was Kurzer's angry re- sponse. "You can forget it! I'll be the NBA's MVP before that plant puts out that tonnage!" Everyone on the EC knew what the problem was. Management is from Lees Point and is worried that a new facility will reduce jobs. "I don't know why I got so angry. I should expect an estimate like this," said Kurzer. After much discus- sion the committee unanimously agreed that 1,200 tons per day was much more accurate and, if anything, a bit optimistic. It was also decided that a per-unit variable cost of $282.1 per ton was appropriate instead of the original figure of $263.9 per ton. With these changes the yearly cash flow after taxes was estimated to be $40,634,680; this was considerably lower than the projection of $61,863,160 based on the figures sent by Lees Point management. MORE CONTROVERSY Both projects are assumed to last 20 years. This is a relatively long time horizon for a capital budgeting project, but the company feels a paper mill is unlikely to become technologically obsolete since paper production techniques have changed very little in the last century. At least one EC member, however, thinks Ooredoo 11:30 AM euruni.online @ 55% CASE 20 FORT GREENWOLD 125 that a 20-year period is too long for the "modernize-the-old" option. Past expe- rience, he argues, indicates that revitalizing an existing facility will rarely extend its life that much, and 15 years seems more probable. If so, he wonders if "we aren't being extremely charitable to the Lees Point plant. By my calculations, as- suming a 20-year time horizon for this project adds $40,634,680 times 5 or $203,173,400 to the total yearly cash flows. That's some largesse!" The rest of the committee concedes that 20 years may be a bit long, but decides to retain this time period as a working hypothesis. EMPLOYEE CONCERNS Some EC members are worried about the impact on employee morale if the fac- tory is relocated. "Apparently," says Wadkins, "there is considerable opposition to closing down the old factory, judging from the inaccurate figures we re- ceived." It is noted, however, that the move will "most certainly" not cost any- one a job, but will, in fact, create new positions, including some relatively high- paying managerial ones. Nonetheless, it was obvious that the proposed relocation would impose costs on the employees. Many would either have to re- locate to Midtown or face a 30-mile round trip daily commute. Wadkins won- dered if it "was fair and appropriate" to ask the employees to bear such costs, especially in light of the remarkable loyalty the Lees Point employees had shown to the company. She notes that a large proportion of the employees have worked for FG for more than 10 years. "One thing is clear," remarks a subdued Kurzer. "If we choose to relocate the plant, it is important that it does not appear to be some type of ivory-tower de- cision that would be inconsistent with the management philosophy we've pro- moted all these years. Barbara, I am sensitive to the issues you bring up. Employee morale and employee loyalty are very important considerations. Maybe we could work something out-you know, like some type of moving al- lowance." Kurzer also reminded the committee that Midtown was the closest suitable site to Lees Point should the company move. QUESTIONS 1. (a) Calculate the NPV of modernizing the existing paper mill. (b) Calculate the NPV of building a new paper mill. 2. (a) Calculate the IRR of each investment. (b) Calculate the payback of each. 3. (a) Do the NPV and IRR methods give the same accept/reject signals? (b) Explain why the NPV and IRR methods can give divergent signals when evaluating mutually exclusive alternatives. CAPITAL BUDGETING 4. Suppose that the appropriate life of a modernized factory is 15 instead of 20 years. Evaluate the argument that "assuming a 20-year time horizon for this project adds $40,634,680 times 5 or $203,173,400 to the yearly cash flows." 5. Based on your calculations in the previous questions and information in the case, what decision do you recommend? Justify your choice. 6. (a) Building a new mill requires $464.1 million more than modernizing the old mill but will generate an extra $67,093,320 in yearly cash flow. Calculate the IRR on this incremental expenditure. Compare your an- swer to the 12 percent required return. (b) Based on your answer in part (a), suggest a decision rule for the IRR in evaluating mutually exclusive alternatives with different initial costs.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
1 a To calculate the Net Present Value NPV of modernizing the existing paper mill we need to discount the yearly cash flows from the project and subtract the initial investment Given that the yearly c... View the full answer
Related Book For
Taxes and Business Strategy A Planning Approach
ISBN: 9780132752671
5th edition
Authors: Myron Scholes, Mark Wolfson, Merle Erickson, Michelle Hanlon
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
A project that cost $80000 with a useful life of 5 years is being considered. Straight-line depreciation is being used and salvage value is $5000. The project will generate annual revenues of $21375....
-
Suppose you prefer working 40 hours per week to 20 hours, and prefer working 32hours per week to either 20 or 40 hours. However, you are forced to work either 20hours or 40 hours per week. Is your...
-
Suppose that taxable bonds maturing in 5 years yield 10% per year before tax. a. What risk adjusted appreciation rate on a non dividend paying common stock is required for the following taxpayers to...
-
1. What is the present value (PV") of an offer of $15,000 two years from now if the Opportunity Cost of Capital (OCC) is $12% per annum? 2. What is the PV of an offer to receive $12,000 three years...
-
Craps: In the game of craps, you may bet $1 that the next roll of the dice will be an 11. If the dice come up 11, your profit is $15. If the dice don't come up 11, you lose $1. The probability that...
-
Identify the three types of organizations that comprise the public accounting profession.
-
The balance sheet data for Quick Care, Inc. September 30, 2010, follow: Requirement 1. The following are three independent assumptions about the business during September. For each assumption,...
-
On August 6, A&B Construction has three outstanding invoices payable to Excel Builders Supply. Invoice 535, dated July 16, is for $3228.56; Invoice 598, dated July 24, is for $2945.31; and Invoice...
-
Please answer these questions for Southwest What is your company's cost of debt? What is your company's cost of equity? What is your company's weighted average cost of capital? What's the company's...
-
The October 31, 2017, bank statement of Jazzera Distributors has just arrived. To prepare Jazzera Distributors' bank reconciliation, you gather the following data: a. The October 31 bank balance is...
-
In relation to the High Court decision in Smythe v Bayleys Real Estate Ltd (1993) 5 TCLR 454(HC), answer ALL the following questions: 1.) very brief outline of the facts as well as explain what the...
-
You gather the following info about a company: Income Statement for the year 20x5 Sales Expenses COGS Depreciation Goodwill Interest Expense Total Expenses $1500 $1300 20 10 40 $1370 Income from...
-
I'm doing a project of making Bath and Body Works expand its market to Vietnam. How do I address this question? Question: Controls -measures used to monitor progress and confirm that the foreign...
-
Q1 Why might a company such as Uber choose to remain private rather than go public? Q.2 Red Tech Inc. wants to ensure it is ready to sell stock and raise money once the market for its products and...
-
Over a few week period, Alan noticed a nice-looking vintage skateboard in a garage he walked by on his way to the bus each morning. Alan also noticed that a man was often outside the garage working...
-
How do various motivational theories, such as self-determination theory and expectancy theory, inform our understanding of employee engagement and satisfaction within diverse organizational settings ?
-
1. Re-design the given circuit using a minimal number of NOR gates (any size). You do not have to draw the circuit. CD A AB B Out
-
Identify the most stable compound:
-
Paula makes the following gifts in the current year: $ 20,000 to the United Way; $ 15,000 to her brother Skip, who is a compulsive gambler; $ 45,000 to her husband Larry, to fund a new boat; and $...
-
Suppose Congress was to reduce the top corporate tax rate, tc, to 30% from 35%. How would this affect the required pretax corporate return, R*c, calculated in the final line of Table 4.4? That is,...
-
Risk differences among assets mask the effects of differential taxation on returns. If we know the required after tax risk premiums on assets, how can we determine the effects of differential...
-
\(F(t)=\alpha\) t corresponds to: a. an impulse b. step force c. ramp force
-
Firm F produces five products: A, B, C, D, and E. Relevant data for all five products are as follows (figures in millions of dollars). There are no cross-selling effects (i.e., sales of one product...
-
For each project in the previous question, rank the projects according to their NPV as a function of the discount rate. Previous question Consider the following mutually exclusive projects: Amounts...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App