The fourth amendment clearly states that there are rules and an order to which the government can search ones personal property. The statement "Unlimited surveillance power and unfettered authority to invade the privacy rights of American citizens without notice" is a clear violation of the fourth amendment. Political power figures in the United States are not above the basics of the constitution and they should be held accountable when they go against they laws they are supposed to enforce. The fourth amendment states that it is "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause." This right is expected to be respected by all Americans and violations of this law should be punished accordingly. You could argue that every case has special circumstances and the violation of the law could be seen as acceptable. Each situation is going to be different but it is not enough for someone to just use their best judgement to make the call on what happens. There is a process by which the government is allowed to search or surveille, that is lawful. If you have to go outside the confines of the law to catch someone breaking the law your actions should not just be forgotten because you caught the person. Ones property should not be invaded, searched, or exposed unless their is clear probable cause to commit such an act. An American should have a sense of security in their personal belongings and should not have to worry about the government interfering with them unless evidence of wrongdoing is present.

Work Cited:

Maddison, James. "U.S. Constitution - Fourth Amendment | Resources - Congress." Constitution Annotated, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-4/.

Do you agree? why or why not ?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable search... View the full answer