The legislative branch is home to the bicameral Congress: the Senate and the House of Representatives....
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
The legislative branch is home to the bicameral Congress: the Senate and the House of Representatives. The founders created this innovative branch of government to distribute power among the people through their representatives. Members of Congress are elected to represent their constituents interests on the national stage. The Constitution specifically grants Congress its most important power the authority to pass, repeal, and amend laws. Additional powers (listed in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution) are shared between the two houses. These include the power to declare war, coin money, raise an army and navy, regulate commerce, establish rules of immigration and naturalization, and establish the federal courts and their jurisdictions. Additionally, Congress oversees executive branch performance and ensures responsible government affairs and spending. Congress as a Body with Enumerated Powers Previously, we developed our understanding of congressional power provided in the Constitution. Article I creates a Congress of enumerated powers and every law Congress enacts must be based on powers enumerated in the Constitution. In this assignment, you will analyze the powers of the two houses of Congress, such as expressed and implied powers. Furthermore, you will evaluate the constitutionality of the Gun-Free Schools Zones Act. Big Question How are the powers of Congress limited in the American constitutional government? In 1990, Congress passed the Gun-Free School Zones Act to reduce the threat of crime impacting American youth. The law made it illegal to knowingly possess a firearm in a location that the possessor should know is a school zone. This law was subject to judicial review in the case of United States v. Lopez. Alfonso Lopez Jr., a 12th-grade student at Edison High School in Texas, was convicted under federal law for carrying a concealed firearm into school. Lopez appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, claiming that the law was unconstitutional and that Congress overextended its power to legislate under the Commerce Clause (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3). The clause details Congress's authority to regulate foreign commerce and interstate (state-to-state) commerce. The federal court of appeals agreed with Lopez and overturned his conviction. The federal government requested a judicial review of the appeal court's ruling. The government argued that regulating the possession of firearms close to and on school property is related to the Commerce Clause because of the substantial costs and repercussions associated with violent crimes. Furthermore, guns near schools adversely affect students' ability to succeed in their education and the nation's economy. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court declared that the Gun-Free School Zone, twas unconstitutional as written. The majority decision cited the number of assumptions one would have to make to connect firearms in school zones with the impact on interstate commerce. In other words, if Congress could regulate something so far removed from interstate commerce, then it could regulate anything. However, because the Constitution explicitly creates Congress as a body with enumerated powers, they cannot have the power to regulate anything. The dissent cited that guns in or near schools would prevent citizens from completing their education and negatively impact the region's economic well-being by losing skilled labor. Congress approved a revised version of the law in 1995. The revised Gun-Free School Zone Law includes language limiting the illegal act to possessing firearms that have moved through or otherwise affect interstate commerce. The burden of proof to prove interstate commerce's involvement rests on the prosecution. The revised version of the Gun-Free School Zones Act is currently used and has been upheld several times. Instructions 1. Open the Congressional Power document (MS Word 18KB, opens in new window) and download a copy of the document to your computer (click the Download button). You will write an exploratory essay reflecting your analysis of the limitations of the powers of Congress by answering questions about United States v. Lopez. You will answer all questions for this assignment in the Congressional Power document. 2. Describe the background of the case: who were the parties involved, where and when the case took place, and other background information about the case. (at least one paragraph) 3. Discuss the argument presented by each of the parties involved. (at least one paragraph per party involved) • To challenge his conviction, what argument did Lopez's defense present to the court? o What constitutional implications did the defense highlight in the case? o What was the counter-argument presented by the Federal government? o What constitutional issues did they bring up in the case? 4. Discuss the Supreme Court's ruling, its majority opinion including the justices involved, and the corresponding dissenting opinion of the opposing justices. (at least two paragraphs) 5. After analyzing the case, how does United States v. Lopez show the limitations of the powers of Congress? Did Congress have the power to pass the Gun Free School Zones Act? (one paragraph) 6. Include a bibliography using at least two sources in MLA or APA citation format. Use Easy Bib (opens in a new window) to help you create the citation. Congressional Power 6.4 Assignment: Limits of Congressional Power Directions Use the information provided in this assignment to provide a comprehensive answer to the following prompts. Use specific, concrete, and relevant details and examples from your research to support your answers. 1. Describe the background of the case: who were the parties involved, where and when the case took place, and other background information about the case. (at least one paragraph) 2. Describe the argument presented by each of the parties involved. (at least one paragraph per party involved) 3. Describe the Supreme Court's ruling, its majority opinion including the justices involved, and the corresponding dissenting opinion of the opposing justices. (at least two paragraphs) 4. Describe how United States v. Lopez showed the limitations of the powers of Congress. (one paragraph) 5. Include a bibliography using at least two sources in MLA or APA citation format. The legislative branch is home to the bicameral Congress: the Senate and the House of Representatives. The founders created this innovative branch of government to distribute power among the people through their representatives. Members of Congress are elected to represent their constituents interests on the national stage. The Constitution specifically grants Congress its most important power the authority to pass, repeal, and amend laws. Additional powers (listed in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution) are shared between the two houses. These include the power to declare war, coin money, raise an army and navy, regulate commerce, establish rules of immigration and naturalization, and establish the federal courts and their jurisdictions. Additionally, Congress oversees executive branch performance and ensures responsible government affairs and spending. Congress as a Body with Enumerated Powers Previously, we developed our understanding of congressional power provided in the Constitution. Article I creates a Congress of enumerated powers and every law Congress enacts must be based on powers enumerated in the Constitution. In this assignment, you will analyze the powers of the two houses of Congress, such as expressed and implied powers. Furthermore, you will evaluate the constitutionality of the Gun-Free Schools Zones Act. Big Question How are the powers of Congress limited in the American constitutional government? In 1990, Congress passed the Gun-Free School Zones Act to reduce the threat of crime impacting American youth. The law made it illegal to knowingly possess a firearm in a location that the possessor should know is a school zone. This law was subject to judicial review in the case of United States v. Lopez. Alfonso Lopez Jr., a 12th-grade student at Edison High School in Texas, was convicted under federal law for carrying a concealed firearm into school. Lopez appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, claiming that the law was unconstitutional and that Congress overextended its power to legislate under the Commerce Clause (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3). The clause details Congress's authority to regulate foreign commerce and interstate (state-to-state) commerce. The federal court of appeals agreed with Lopez and overturned his conviction. The federal government requested a judicial review of the appeal court's ruling. The government argued that regulating the possession of firearms close to and on school property is related to the Commerce Clause because of the substantial costs and repercussions associated with violent crimes. Furthermore, guns near schools adversely affect students' ability to succeed in their education and the nation's economy. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court declared that the Gun-Free School Zone, twas unconstitutional as written. The majority decision cited the number of assumptions one would have to make to connect firearms in school zones with the impact on interstate commerce. In other words, if Congress could regulate something so far removed from interstate commerce, then it could regulate anything. However, because the Constitution explicitly creates Congress as a body with enumerated powers, they cannot have the power to regulate anything. The dissent cited that guns in or near schools would prevent citizens from completing their education and negatively impact the region's economic well-being by losing skilled labor. Congress approved a revised version of the law in 1995. The revised Gun-Free School Zone Law includes language limiting the illegal act to possessing firearms that have moved through or otherwise affect interstate commerce. The burden of proof to prove interstate commerce's involvement rests on the prosecution. The revised version of the Gun-Free School Zones Act is currently used and has been upheld several times. Instructions 1. Open the Congressional Power document (MS Word 18KB, opens in new window) and download a copy of the document to your computer (click the Download button). You will write an exploratory essay reflecting your analysis of the limitations of the powers of Congress by answering questions about United States v. Lopez. You will answer all questions for this assignment in the Congressional Power document. 2. Describe the background of the case: who were the parties involved, where and when the case took place, and other background information about the case. (at least one paragraph) 3. Discuss the argument presented by each of the parties involved. (at least one paragraph per party involved) • To challenge his conviction, what argument did Lopez's defense present to the court? o What constitutional implications did the defense highlight in the case? o What was the counter-argument presented by the Federal government? o What constitutional issues did they bring up in the case? 4. Discuss the Supreme Court's ruling, its majority opinion including the justices involved, and the corresponding dissenting opinion of the opposing justices. (at least two paragraphs) 5. After analyzing the case, how does United States v. Lopez show the limitations of the powers of Congress? Did Congress have the power to pass the Gun Free School Zones Act? (one paragraph) 6. Include a bibliography using at least two sources in MLA or APA citation format. Use Easy Bib (opens in a new window) to help you create the citation. Congressional Power 6.4 Assignment: Limits of Congressional Power Directions Use the information provided in this assignment to provide a comprehensive answer to the following prompts. Use specific, concrete, and relevant details and examples from your research to support your answers. 1. Describe the background of the case: who were the parties involved, where and when the case took place, and other background information about the case. (at least one paragraph) 2. Describe the argument presented by each of the parties involved. (at least one paragraph per party involved) 3. Describe the Supreme Court's ruling, its majority opinion including the justices involved, and the corresponding dissenting opinion of the opposing justices. (at least two paragraphs) 4. Describe how United States v. Lopez showed the limitations of the powers of Congress. (one paragraph) 5. Include a bibliography using at least two sources in MLA or APA citation format.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
Here is an answer 1 United States v Lopez was a case that took place in 1990 when the federal government prosecuted Alfonso Lopez Jr a 12thgrade student for breaking the GunFree School Zones Act of 19... View the full answer
Related Book For
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these law questions
-
Let U = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}, A = {1, 3, 5, 7, 9}, B = {2, 4, 6, 8, 10}, and C = {1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9}. List the elements of each set. (a) CC c (b) ( A C ) c (c) A ( B C )
-
How can leaders sustain momentum and relevance around visionary visions amidst evolving external environments, internal dynamics, and competing priorities, fostering adaptability, resilience, and...
-
The Crazy Eddie fraud may appear smaller and gentler than the massive billion-dollar frauds exposed in recent times, such as Bernie Madoffs Ponzi scheme, frauds in the subprime mortgage market, the...
-
1. As shown by point D in Fig 3.1, the volume of an ideal diatomic gas is 2.00L at standard condition (STP, T=273.15K, P=101.3kPa). The gas is heated to A with its volume conserved, expands...
-
Many dry cereals are fortified with iron, which is added to the cereal in the form of small iron particles. How might these particles be separated from the cereal?
-
Find the inverse of the matrix. , parameters a 0 0 A= 0 a+3 0 a+1 a+2 3(a+1)
-
The following questions concern possible violations of the rules of conduct discussed in the chapter. Choose the best response a. In which one of the following situations would a public accountant be...
-
The stockholders equity accounts of Karp Company at January 1, 2014, are as follows. Preferred Stock, 6%, $50 par ................$600,000 Common Stock , $5 par .................... 800,000 Paid-in...
-
f(x)=-(1)/(2)((1)/(4))^(x-3)+4 is shifted left 3 units, strotched vertically by a factor of 8, reflected about the x axis, and then shifted downward 4 units. 2 answers
-
An older man has just lost his job after repeated warnings to come to work sober and seek help for his alcohol addiction. He has decided that he should get help now. Too little, too late, he says...
-
Management at Winters Co. is trying to establish a share price for each of the following companies that are potential targets for a takeover : Grand Co. Try Co. Net assets 30,000,000 $42,000,000...
-
A one-question survey is to be distributed to a random sample of 1000 adults in Ohio. The question asks if they support an increase in the state sales tax from 6% to 7%, with the additional revenue...
-
Assume that the cost formula for one of a company's mixed expenses is $10,000+ $4.00 per unit. The company's planned level of activity was 2,000 units and its actual level of activity was 2,200...
-
In regard's the stock Columbia Sportswear (COLM) discuss the valuation and the valuation compared to the industry.
-
1.For much of the 20th century, new car prices rose at an average annual rate of 5.89%. Given a beginning new car price of $900, how long did it take for the average new car price to rise to $27,865?...
-
explain why some manufacturing companies are able to allocate electric power costs to production cost centres whereas others can only apportion them?
-
6. The Cost of Capital: Weighted Average Cost of Capital The firm's target capital structure is the mix of debt, preferred stock, and common equity the firm plans to raise funds for its future...
-
For the following exercises, find the inverse of the function and graph both the function and its inverse. f(x) = 4 x 2 , x 0
-
John Doe, an employee at a Veterans Administration hospital, saw VA physician Dr. Hall as a patient at the hospital's Employee Health Center (EHC) on two occasions. On September 30, 2002, Doe saw Dr....
-
Mathews filed a grievance under a CBA with owners of the Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News, alleging that his demotion was motivated by national origin discrimination and in retaliation for...
-
Lakeland Enterprises, a water and sewer contractor, was engaged in a project on a public street in Marshfield, Wisconsin, when Chad Greenwood, an OSHA compliance officer, was driving by the project...
-
Paymore Shoes acquired 80 percent of the voting stock of Spire Footwear on February 1, 2014, for \($21\) million. The fair value of the noncontrolling interest at the acquisition date was \($3\)...
-
Pacific Athletic Corporation owns all of the voting stock of Solovair Apparel. Acquisition cost was \($10\) million in excess of Solovairs book value of \($2\) million, and the excess was attributed...
-
Peninsula Industries and Seaport Company, a 90 percent owned subsidiary, engage in extensive intercompany transactions involving raw materials, component parts, and completed products. Peninsula...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App