The North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria has dismissed a bid to have the environmental authorisation...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
The North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria has dismissed a bid to have the environmental authorisation for Eskom's proposed gas power plant in Richards Bay overturned, but has taken aim at the deficient public participation process. In the judgment handed down by Judge Anthony Millar last week, the court dismissed a landmark application brought by two environmental justice NGOs the South Durban Community Environmental Alliance and Groundwork - to review and set aside the Department of Environmental Affairs' decision to grant Eskom's proposed power plant an environmental authorisation. Eskom was granted environmental authorisation in December 2019 for the combined cycle gas power plant intended to be fuelled by gas via a pipeline that will be installed from the Richards Bay Port and which will supply up to 3000MW of energy. Construction on the project has not yet started. The judgment found six out of seven grounds for review of the decision were without merit and could not succeed. These grounds related to inadequate climate change impact assessment; failure to consider renewable alternatives; and the failure to consider cumulative environmental impacts. The court did, however, find the public participation process to be deficient, as communication was published in English only and not isiZulu - a language spoken by 79% of the community that would be directly affected by the proposed plant. Noting the failure to advertise and notify the public in a language other than English, the judgment said "the cavalier approach of the DEFF [Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries] and Eskom to this aspect is to be deprecated". The judgment further noted that such an oversight could have warranted setting aside the decision to grant the environmental authorisation, were it not for the fact the Environmental Authorisation for the construction of the gas plant is merely the first link in a chain of successive applications that will have to be processed for the associated gas infrastructure. Because the legal challenge has brought to the fore the deficit in the public participation process, the court was of the view that costs should be awarded in favour of the NGOs. Eskom and DEFF were therefore ordered to foot the bill for two legal counsel. QUESTION 1 (25 Marks) Identify and discuss the application of at least five (5) dimensions of corporate responsibility presented in the case study. State any assumptions you may be required to make. (25 Marks) With the aid of your appropriate examples, discuss at least six (6) factors that have significantly contributed to the current prominence of corporate governance. Based on the actions of the NGOs, evaluate which of the factors is being demonstrated in the case study. QUESTION 2 QUESTION 3 (25 Marks) In relation to the case study, elaborate on the importance of sound ethical decisions in business and discuss the four (4) considerations/requirements that can be utilised by Eskom to assist decision-making. Evaluate which of the consideration made the court decide that costs should be awarded in favour of the NGOS. (25 Marks) Discuss the importance of globalisation of ethical decision-making for companies like Eskom. Based on the case study, differentiate between accountability and compliance in the context of business ethics. QUESTION 4 The North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria has dismissed a bid to have the environmental authorisation for Eskom's proposed gas power plant in Richards Bay overturned, but has taken aim at the deficient public participation process. In the judgment handed down by Judge Anthony Millar last week, the court dismissed a landmark application brought by two environmental justice NGOs the South Durban Community Environmental Alliance and Groundwork - to review and set aside the Department of Environmental Affairs' decision to grant Eskom's proposed power plant an environmental authorisation. Eskom was granted environmental authorisation in December 2019 for the combined cycle gas power plant intended to be fuelled by gas via a pipeline that will be installed from the Richards Bay Port and which will supply up to 3000MW of energy. Construction on the project has not yet started. The judgment found six out of seven grounds for review of the decision were without merit and could not succeed. These grounds related to inadequate climate change impact assessment; failure to consider renewable alternatives; and the failure to consider cumulative environmental impacts. The court did, however, find the public participation process to be deficient, as communication was published in English only and not isiZulu - a language spoken by 79% of the community that would be directly affected by the proposed plant. Noting the failure to advertise and notify the public in a language other than English, the judgment said "the cavalier approach of the DEFF [Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries] and Eskom to this aspect is to be deprecated". The judgment further noted that such an oversight could have warranted setting aside the decision to grant the environmental authorisation, were it not for the fact the Environmental Authorisation for the construction of the gas plant is merely the first link in a chain of successive applications that will have to be processed for the associated gas infrastructure. Because the legal challenge has brought to the fore the deficit in the public participation process, the court was of the view that costs should be awarded in favour of the NGOs. Eskom and DEFF were therefore ordered to foot the bill for two legal counsel. QUESTION 1 (25 Marks) Identify and discuss the application of at least five (5) dimensions of corporate responsibility presented in the case study. State any assumptions you may be required to make. (25 Marks) With the aid of your appropriate examples, discuss at least six (6) factors that have significantly contributed to the current prominence of corporate governance. Based on the actions of the NGOs, evaluate which of the factors is being demonstrated in the case study. QUESTION 2 QUESTION 3 (25 Marks) In relation to the case study, elaborate on the importance of sound ethical decisions in business and discuss the four (4) considerations/requirements that can be utilised by Eskom to assist decision-making. Evaluate which of the consideration made the court decide that costs should be awarded in favour of the NGOS. (25 Marks) Discuss the importance of globalisation of ethical decision-making for companies like Eskom. Based on the case study, differentiate between accountability and compliance in the context of business ethics. QUESTION 4
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
1 The five dimensions of corporate responsibility presented in the case study are environment social governance human rights and philanthropy 2 The si... View the full answer
Related Book For
Fundamentals of corporate finance
ISBN: 978-0073382395
9th edition
Authors: Stephen Ross, Randolph Westerfield, Bradford Jordan
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
Consider a combined gassteam power cycle. The topping cycle is a simple Brayton cycle that has a pressure ratio of 7. Air enters the compressor at 15°C at a rate of 10 kg/s and the gas turbine at...
-
A combined gas turbine-vapor power plant has a net power output of 15 MW. Air enters the compressor of the gas turbine at 100 kPa, 290 K and is compressed to 1100 kPa. The isentropic efficiency of...
-
Consider a combined cycle power plant using helium and water as the working fluids. Helium enters the compressor of the gas turbine at 1.4 MPa, 350 K and is compressed to 5.5 MPa. The isentropic...
-
Explain why entrepreneurial firms are often in a strong position to use combination strategies.
-
For planning purposes, company headquarters seeks to obtain accurate information about the productive capacity of one of its plants. The plant manager knows that the facilitys capacity is Q = 10,000...
-
Refer to Exercises 6.13 and 6.14. Find the probability of each of the following events. a. The adult is single. b. The adult is not divorced c. The adult is either widowed or divorced.
-
What do we mean by the term relevant evidence?
-
(a) Rochelle Company ships merchandise to Jay Company on December 30. The merchandise reaches the buyer on January 6. Indicate the terms of sale that will result in the goods being included in (1)...
-
From the book Identity A Reader for Writers -in an AUTOETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH on Malcom X identity compose an extended defination of identity in general .Then explain why identity is important and...
-
1. Why do you think the regions are not responding to Wilkess initiative for change? What did Wilkes do wrong with respect to implementing the change? 2. Should Wilkes solicit more active support...
-
12) Solve the following two cases (the cases are independent). a.If you invest $5,000 today at 10% interest, what is the value of the investment at the end of 5 years? b.If you invest $1,200 at the...
-
Explain why the search methods can be used for planning.
-
What do Braitenberg vehicles teach us about intelligence? Do you think the intelligence given to Braitenberg vehicles could be put to some practical use?
-
Why must modern marketers collaborate and learn from their consumers? What has increased the opportunities for marketers to collaborate with them?
-
Explain why L-systems are of interest to Artificial Life researchers.
-
Explain how genetic programming could be used to solve problems.
-
In historical studies there is a premium placed on finding out what the author originally meant given their native language, historical context, and primary audience. The effort of professors to...
-
For Problem estimate the change in y for the given change in x. y = f(x), f'(12) = 30, x increases from 12 to 12.2
-
Empress Corp. has no debt but can borrow at 8.2 percent. The firms WACC is currently 11 percent, and the tax rate is 35 percent. a. What is the companys cost of equity? b. If the firm converts to 25...
-
a What is operating leverage? b How is operating leverage measured? c What are the implications of operating leverage for the financial manager?
-
Solve for the unknown interest rate in each of the following: Present Value Years Interest Rate Future Value $ 240 $ 297 360 10 15 3) 1,080 39,000 38,261 185,382 531,618
-
Which of the following combinations results in a decrease in sample size in a sample for attributes? Risk of Assessing Control Risk Too Low a. Increase b. Decrease c. Increase d. Increase Tolerable...
-
Whatare the nine major steps utilized in a comprehensive approach to information system auditing? Explain why each step is important.
-
Identify four monitoring controls the auditor would expect to find in a welldesigned computer system. Explain the objective of each control identified.
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App