The prosecutor tried to convince the jury that the defendant was guilty because he owned a hammer
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
The prosecutor tried to convince the jury that the defendant was guilty because he owned a hammer that produced an impression similar to that found at the crime scene. As the defendants attorney, how would you argue that matching a tool to crime-scene impressions was insufficient evidence to convict?
Related Book For
Smith and Roberson Business Law
ISBN: 978-0538473637
15th Edition
Authors: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
Posted Date: