Unimin Canada Ltd v United Steelworkers, Local 5383. 2017 CanLII 31794 (Ont LA). USWA Local 862...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Unimin Canada Ltd v United Steelworkers, Local 5383. 2017 CanLII 31794 (Ont LA). USWA Local 862 v Canadian General Tower Ltd. [2003] OLAA no 801. Vu, Uyen. Ottawa Proposes Corporate Killing Law. Canadian HR Reporter. July 14, 2003, p. 1. Workers Health & Safety Centre. Resources. Accessed February 2018. https://www.whsc.on.ca/Resources/ Publications/WHMIS-Resources. Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997. SO 1997, c 16, Schedule A. York Condominium Corp No 163 v Robinson, 2017 ONSC 2419. RELATED WEBSITES • http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/psychosocial/violence. html The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) website contains an extensive list of questions and answers on workplace violence issues. • https://www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/hs/topics/ workplaceviolence.php The Ontario Ministry of Labour website contains resources to help employers develop policies and programs to prevent and address workplace violence and harassment. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Ontario's health and safety legislation is based on an internal responsibility system. Explain this term. In your opinion, is it an effective approach to ensuring safety in the workplace? Give reasons for your answer. 2. Name and explain the three core worker rights under Ontario's OHSA. 3. What are the responsibilities of certified members of a JHSC? 4. Explain the due diligence defence. What steps can employers take to establish this defence? 5. You are the human resources manager in a small manufacturing firm. An operations supervisor, Habrim, comes to you with a problem. The plant has just started working on a rush order from a major customer and now one of his production workers (Bruce) has refused to work because he says that his machinery is unsafe. Habrim checked the machine and it looked safe to him. He then contacted the Ministry of Labour to further investigate the refusal but he is wondering whether, in the meantime, he can get another employee to work on the machine that Bruce says is unsafe. Advise Habrim by explaining to him what the law requires in these circumstances. 6. Thompson, an experienced operator of the bar bundler packager at ABC Steel Co., noticed that bars had fallen into the basement of the packager. Contrary to his training and the employer's safety protocol, Thompson did not lock out the machine. Instead, he placed the machine on automatic and entered the basement area. To get there, he had to push open a self-closing swing gate which displayed a sign warning that the packager had to be "locked out" before entry. Similar signage was on the guard rail fence. Nonetheless, Thompson continued into the basement area; within moments, he was crushed to death by a movable portion of the bundler. The employer was charged with breaching section 25 of the Industrial Establishments regulation under the OHSA, which requires machines with hazards to have a guard to prevent access to the pinch point-the point where moving machinery parts are strong enough to pull someone in and injure them. The employer argued that it had done everything reasonable in the circumstances-employee training, a gate that closed automatically, and ample signage. It claimed that it is impossible to foresee and therefore guard against "reckless" employees who do the totally unexpected-even a locked gate would not have deterred a "determined and intentioned" employee like Thompson. On the basis of these facts, answer the following questions: a. Is this a strict liability offence? If so, does the Ministry of Labour have to prove anything or does the entire burden of proof lie with the employer? b. The employer may avoid liability if it shows that it exercised due diligence in attempting to carry out its duties. What is the standard of proof in making out a due diligence defence: "beyo d a reasonable doubt" or "on a balance of probabilities"? Research what these two different standards of proof mean. c. In light of all the circumstances, in your view did the employer exercise due diligence in the steps it took to protect employees from this hazard? If not, what additional steps should it have taken? Unimin Canada Ltd v United Steelworkers, Local 5383. 2017 CanLII 31794 (Ont LA). USWA Local 862 v Canadian General Tower Ltd. [2003] OLAA no 801. Vu, Uyen. Ottawa Proposes Corporate Killing Law. Canadian HR Reporter. July 14, 2003, p. 1. Workers Health & Safety Centre. Resources. Accessed February 2018. https://www.whsc.on.ca/Resources/ Publications/WHMIS-Resources. Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997. SO 1997, c 16, Schedule A. York Condominium Corp No 163 v Robinson, 2017 ONSC 2419. RELATED WEBSITES • http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/psychosocial/violence. html The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) website contains an extensive list of questions and answers on workplace violence issues. • https://www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/hs/topics/ workplaceviolence.php The Ontario Ministry of Labour website contains resources to help employers develop policies and programs to prevent and address workplace violence and harassment. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Ontario's health and safety legislation is based on an internal responsibility system. Explain this term. In your opinion, is it an effective approach to ensuring safety in the workplace? Give reasons for your answer. 2. Name and explain the three core worker rights under Ontario's OHSA. 3. What are the responsibilities of certified members of a JHSC? 4. Explain the due diligence defence. What steps can employers take to establish this defence? 5. You are the human resources manager in a small manufacturing firm. An operations supervisor, Habrim, comes to you with a problem. The plant has just started working on a rush order from a major customer and now one of his production workers (Bruce) has refused to work because he says that his machinery is unsafe. Habrim checked the machine and it looked safe to him. He then contacted the Ministry of Labour to further investigate the refusal but he is wondering whether, in the meantime, he can get another employee to work on the machine that Bruce says is unsafe. Advise Habrim by explaining to him what the law requires in these circumstances. 6. Thompson, an experienced operator of the bar bundler packager at ABC Steel Co., noticed that bars had fallen into the basement of the packager. Contrary to his training and the employer's safety protocol, Thompson did not lock out the machine. Instead, he placed the machine on automatic and entered the basement area. To get there, he had to push open a self-closing swing gate which displayed a sign warning that the packager had to be "locked out" before entry. Similar signage was on the guard rail fence. Nonetheless, Thompson continued into the basement area; within moments, he was crushed to death by a movable portion of the bundler. The employer was charged with breaching section 25 of the Industrial Establishments regulation under the OHSA, which requires machines with hazards to have a guard to prevent access to the pinch point-the point where moving machinery parts are strong enough to pull someone in and injure them. The employer argued that it had done everything reasonable in the circumstances-employee training, a gate that closed automatically, and ample signage. It claimed that it is impossible to foresee and therefore guard against "reckless" employees who do the totally unexpected-even a locked gate would not have deterred a "determined and intentioned" employee like Thompson. On the basis of these facts, answer the following questions: a. Is this a strict liability offence? If so, does the Ministry of Labour have to prove anything or does the entire burden of proof lie with the employer? b. The employer may avoid liability if it shows that it exercised due diligence in attempting to carry out its duties. What is the standard of proof in making out a due diligence defence: "beyo d a reasonable doubt" or "on a balance of probabilities"? Research what these two different standards of proof mean. c. In light of all the circumstances, in your view did the employer exercise due diligence in the steps it took to protect employees from this hazard? If not, what additional steps should it have taken? Unimin Canada Ltd v United Steelworkers, Local 5383. 2017 CanLII 31794 (Ont LA). USWA Local 862 v Canadian General Tower Ltd. [2003] OLAA no 801. Vu, Uyen. Ottawa Proposes Corporate Killing Law. Canadian HR Reporter. July 14, 2003, p. 1. Workers Health & Safety Centre. Resources. Accessed February 2018. https://www.whsc.on.ca/Resources/ Publications/WHMIS-Resources. Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997. SO 1997, c 16, Schedule A. York Condominium Corp No 163 v Robinson, 2017 ONSC 2419. RELATED WEBSITES • http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/psychosocial/violence. html The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) website contains an extensive list of questions and answers on workplace violence issues. • https://www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/hs/topics/ workplaceviolence.php The Ontario Ministry of Labour website contains resources to help employers develop policies and programs to prevent and address workplace violence and harassment. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Ontario's health and safety legislation is based on an internal responsibility system. Explain this term. In your opinion, is it an effective approach to ensuring safety in the workplace? Give reasons for your answer. 2. Name and explain the three core worker rights under Ontario's OHSA. 3. What are the responsibilities of certified members of a JHSC? 4. Explain the due diligence defence. What steps can employers take to establish this defence? 5. You are the human resources manager in a small manufacturing firm. An operations supervisor, Habrim, comes to you with a problem. The plant has just started working on a rush order from a major customer and now one of his production workers (Bruce) has refused to work because he says that his machinery is unsafe. Habrim checked the machine and it looked safe to him. He then contacted the Ministry of Labour to further investigate the refusal but he is wondering whether, in the meantime, he can get another employee to work on the machine that Bruce says is unsafe. Advise Habrim by explaining to him what the law requires in these circumstances. 6. Thompson, an experienced operator of the bar bundler packager at ABC Steel Co., noticed that bars had fallen into the basement of the packager. Contrary to his training and the employer's safety protocol, Thompson did not lock out the machine. Instead, he placed the machine on automatic and entered the basement area. To get there, he had to push open a self-closing swing gate which displayed a sign warning that the packager had to be "locked out" before entry. Similar signage was on the guard rail fence. Nonetheless, Thompson continued into the basement area; within moments, he was crushed to death by a movable portion of the bundler. The employer was charged with breaching section 25 of the Industrial Establishments regulation under the OHSA, which requires machines with hazards to have a guard to prevent access to the pinch point-the point where moving machinery parts are strong enough to pull someone in and injure them. The employer argued that it had done everything reasonable in the circumstances-employee training, a gate that closed automatically, and ample signage. It claimed that it is impossible to foresee and therefore guard against "reckless" employees who do the totally unexpected-even a locked gate would not have deterred a "determined and intentioned" employee like Thompson. On the basis of these facts, answer the following questions: a. Is this a strict liability offence? If so, does the Ministry of Labour have to prove anything or does the entire burden of proof lie with the employer? b. The employer may avoid liability if it shows that it exercised due diligence in attempting to carry out its duties. What is the standard of proof in making out a due diligence defence: "beyo d a reasonable doubt" or "on a balance of probabilities"? Research what these two different standards of proof mean. c. In light of all the circumstances, in your view did the employer exercise due diligence in the steps it took to protect employees from this hazard? If not, what additional steps should it have taken? Unimin Canada Ltd v United Steelworkers, Local 5383. 2017 CanLII 31794 (Ont LA). USWA Local 862 v Canadian General Tower Ltd. [2003] OLAA no 801. Vu, Uyen. Ottawa Proposes Corporate Killing Law. Canadian HR Reporter. July 14, 2003, p. 1. Workers Health & Safety Centre. Resources. Accessed February 2018. https://www.whsc.on.ca/Resources/ Publications/WHMIS-Resources. Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997. SO 1997, c 16, Schedule A. York Condominium Corp No 163 v Robinson, 2017 ONSC 2419. RELATED WEBSITES • http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/psychosocial/violence. html The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) website contains an extensive list of questions and answers on workplace violence issues. • https://www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/hs/topics/ workplaceviolence.php The Ontario Ministry of Labour website contains resources to help employers develop policies and programs to prevent and address workplace violence and harassment. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Ontario's health and safety legislation is based on an internal responsibility system. Explain this term. In your opinion, is it an effective approach to ensuring safety in the workplace? Give reasons for your answer. 2. Name and explain the three core worker rights under Ontario's OHSA. 3. What are the responsibilities of certified members of a JHSC? 4. Explain the due diligence defence. What steps can employers take to establish this defence? 5. You are the human resources manager in a small manufacturing firm. An operations supervisor, Habrim, comes to you with a problem. The plant has just started working on a rush order from a major customer and now one of his production workers (Bruce) has refused to work because he says that his machinery is unsafe. Habrim checked the machine and it looked safe to him. He then contacted the Ministry of Labour to further investigate the refusal but he is wondering whether, in the meantime, he can get another employee to work on the machine that Bruce says is unsafe. Advise Habrim by explaining to him what the law requires in these circumstances. 6. Thompson, an experienced operator of the bar bundler packager at ABC Steel Co., noticed that bars had fallen into the basement of the packager. Contrary to his training and the employer's safety protocol, Thompson did not lock out the machine. Instead, he placed the machine on automatic and entered the basement area. To get there, he had to push open a self-closing swing gate which displayed a sign warning that the packager had to be "locked out" before entry. Similar signage was on the guard rail fence. Nonetheless, Thompson continued into the basement area; within moments, he was crushed to death by a movable portion of the bundler. The employer was charged with breaching section 25 of the Industrial Establishments regulation under the OHSA, which requires machines with hazards to have a guard to prevent access to the pinch point-the point where moving machinery parts are strong enough to pull someone in and injure them. The employer argued that it had done everything reasonable in the circumstances-employee training, a gate that closed automatically, and ample signage. It claimed that it is impossible to foresee and therefore guard against "reckless" employees who do the totally unexpected-even a locked gate would not have deterred a "determined and intentioned" employee like Thompson. On the basis of these facts, answer the following questions: a. Is this a strict liability offence? If so, does the Ministry of Labour have to prove anything or does the entire burden of proof lie with the employer? b. The employer may avoid liability if it shows that it exercised due diligence in attempting to carry out its duties. What is the standard of proof in making out a due diligence defence: "beyo d a reasonable doubt" or "on a balance of probabilities"? Research what these two different standards of proof mean. c. In light of all the circumstances, in your view did the employer exercise due diligence in the steps it took to protect employees from this hazard? If not, what additional steps should it have taken?
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
I can provide a general overview and insights into the questions youve posted but keep in mind that I cannot access specific legal cases or websites H... View the full answer
Related Book For
Advanced Financial Accounting
ISBN: 978-0137030385
6th edition
Authors: Thomas Beechy, Umashanker Trivedi, Kenneth MacAulay
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these human resource management questions
-
A project has an initial cost of $ 5 2 , 7 0 0 and a market value of $ 6 1 , 8 0 0 . What is the difference between these two values called?
-
Suppose the premium on a 6 - month 9 5 0 - strike S&R call is $ 1 2 0 . 4 1 and the premium on a put with the same strike price is $ 5 1 . 7 8 , while the premium on a 6 - month 1 0 0 0 - strike S&R...
-
Managing Scope Changes Case Study Scope changes on a project can occur regardless of how well the project is planned or executed. Scope changes can be the result of something that was omitted during...
-
Multiple Choice Questions 1. If a company has a $25,000 reduction in sales and an increase of $7,000 in fixed costs with a contribution margin ratio of 34 percent, by how much will net income change?...
-
Outline the differences between the information provided in the financial statements of sole traders and partnerships.
-
The economies of the world tend to rise and fall in cycles that offset each other. International stocks can provide possible diversification for a portfolio heavy on U.S. equities. Because research...
-
Welch & Associates, Inc., completed the following transactions during September 2010, its first month of operations: Requirement 1. Using the steps outlined in the five-step transaction analysis,...
-
Guardian Security Services was established on August 15, 2010, to provide security services. The services provided during the remainder of the month are listed below. Aug. 18. Issued Invoice No. 1 to...
-
King Richard Radio's stock is expected to grow at a 10 percent rate for the next 3 years and then to level off at a constant growth rate of 3 percent per year thereafter. The company just paid a...
-
By contract entered into in 1991, Spouse 1 and Spouse 2 (former spouse as of January 2, 2015 ) agreed that any property either of us now has or may hereafter acquire * * * in any way, either by...
-
What are the steps needed to construct the state chart diagram?
-
What is the relationship between an object state and state transition event?
-
During the design phase in object-oriented design, are any changes made to the use cases created earlier? If so, what are these changes, and what is their overall purpose?
-
What are the interface objects users may find for the following? a. Photo printer that doesnt require a computer to print pictures. b. Service station gas pump. c. Entrance/exit door in retail store.
-
Explain the purpose of the class responsibility collaboration (CRC) card; then create a CRC card for each object type identified in your previous exercises.
-
Which of the following is a statement of Hess's Law? a. The AH of a reaction depends on the physical states of the reactants and products. b. The AH for a process in the forward direction is equal to...
-
Which internal control principle is especially diffi cult for small organizations to implement? Why?
-
Describe the ways in which the nature of revenue in not-for-profit organizations can differ from the nature of revenue in business enterprises.
-
How does a parent companys total net assets amount differ under consolidated reporting as compared to equity reporting for a subsidiary?
-
On August 15, 20X1, the European Exchange Club (EEC) was formed in an effort to create a united social group out of several separate regional clubs in the vicinity of the city of Decker, located in...
-
Consider water flow around a circular cylinder, of diameter \(D\) and length \(l\). In addition to geometry, the drag force is known to depend on liquid speed, \(V\), density, \(ho\), and viscosity,...
-
A 1:10 scale model of a tractor-trailer rig is tested in a wind tunnel. The model frontal area is \(A_{m}=0.1 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\). When tested at \(V_{m}=75 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\) in standard air,...
-
The power, \(\mathscr{P}\), required to drive a fan is assumed to depend on fluid density \(ho\), volume flow rate \(Q\), impeller diameter \(D\), and angular speed \(\omega\). If a fan with...
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App