using a strategy that uses mixed approaches to evaluate a diabetes prevention program for ai/ans has the
Question:
using a strategy that uses mixed approaches to evaluate a diabetes prevention program for ai/ans has the potential to deliver a variety of benefits. using a design that integrates various methodologies would allow both quantitative and qualitative information. this would give a more accurate picture of the health programs' successes and current issues. the second advantage of mixed methods design is that it allows members of the ai/an community to participate in the evaluation process. this is an essential step in ensuring that the evaluation is culturally competent and addresses the specific needs of ai/ans.
despite the challenges evaluating a diabetes prevention program for ai/ans should use a design that incorporates various approaches. the advantages of employing a mixed-methods approach outweigh the drawbacks, and it is the most effective strategy to ensure that the evaluation is finish and sensitive to cultural norms.
encouraging physical activity: how might you go about measuring whether you achieved that program objective? in other words, what type of data collection methods would you use to determine if you met that objective? what type of information would you collect with that data collection methods?