UsingUnited States v. Chanthasouxat, 342 F.3d 1271 (11th Cir. 2003) discuss whether a court would hold that stoppingMike Cooper's car [fact pattern found on page 30 - Joshua Smeek] was constitutional. Your answer should state specifically the rule of law from Chanthasouxat and what made the Smeek facts different from and similar to the facts in Chanthasouxat. Do not forget to reach a conclusion. 2. Using18 U.S.C.  2510 (West 2007) and United States v. McKinnon, 985 F.2d 525, discuss whether a court would suppress the conversation recorded by the police officer. Your answer should state specifically the rule of law from McKinnon and what made the Smeek facts different from and similar to the facts in McKinnon. Do not forget to reach a conclusion. 3.Using Brendlin v. California, 127 S. Ct. 2400 (2007), discuss whether a court would hold that the officer had probable cause to arrest Smeek. Your answer should state specifically the test to determine whether there was probable cause from Brendlin and what made the Weiss facts different from and similar to the facts in Brendlin. Do not forget to reach a conclusion.

What would a law office memo look like given the below information?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

Memorandum To Supervising Attorney From Your Name Date Todays Date Subject Legal Analysis of Facts in Smeek Case I have conducted a legal analysis of the facts presented in the Smeek case focusing on ... View the full answer