We ask 10 simulated jury panels to determine how much money to award in a fictional lawsuit
Question:
We ask 10 simulated jury panels to determine how much money to award in a fictional lawsuit and each comes up with a different amount. This study has a problem with:
validity |
2) | reliability |
3) | explanatory statistics |
4) | generalizability |
You see two graphs presenting the same relationship between gas prices and how many people go see movies in a theater. One graph depicts a steep decline, while the other has a fairly straight line. The relationship looks stable/there really isn't any variation on this second graph.
What is probably happening between these two graphs?
the unit of analysis is different
they are looking at data from different years
the y-axis is different
one of the graphs is lying
On March 13th, 2020 Breonna Taylor was fatally shot and killed while sleeping in her apartment by responding officers issuing a no-knock-warrant. Shortly after, protests ensued along with a law in remembrance of Breonna, coined "Breonna's Law". Breonna's Law indefinitely bans no-knock-warrants within Louisville Kentucky (where the death of Breonna took place) and sets new standard guidelines requiring police officers have their body cameras on when conducting a search and sets a minimum time period before and after the operation that the cameras must remain active.
Breonna's Law falls under which part of the social problems process?
social problems work
public reaction
policymaking
claimsmaking
A subjectivist might suggest that discrimination against people with blue eyes is not a social problem in the United States because:
discrimination on eye color is not illegal in the U.S.
people in the U.S.do not think of discrimination based on eye color as a problem
there is no research to indicate that people are discriminated against on the basis of their eye color
discrimination based on blue eye color does not hurt enough people to cause serious harm to society
Two large vegan groups are currently in a frame dispute.One claims that people should be vegan for the sake of the environment;producing meat damages the climate.The other argues that people should be vegan for human rights;the current farming and slaughtering systems we have are too fast paced and dehumanizing.Workers are injured at a high rate and are not compensated well enough.
What are these two groups disagreeing about?
the conclusion | |
the grounds | |
the popular hazard | |
the warrant |
Expert Answer:
Answer 1 The problem with the study described is related to reliability Explanation The study has a problem with reliability because each of the 10 si... View the full answer
