You are working for a hotel ownership corporation. Your development and feasibility team has identified a...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
You are working for a hotel ownership corporation. Your development and feasibility team has identified a resort hotel in Florida that appears to be a great opportunity. The acquisition team has identified three potential capital structures and has sourced these using entities your company has already done business with in other transactions. Your job is to examine the relative risk, and the return to your company for these three capital structures (stacks). Background As we have already learned, the financing structure used in the purchase of a hotel asset is virtually always some combination of debt and equity. A lender will never finance 100% of an asset - in fact they will rarely finance more than 60% of the asset because the hotel industry is classified as fairly high risk. In the event of a forclosure the lender wants to be assured that they could sell the asset and recover their entire debt. On the other side, private equity virtually never finances 100% of a project because it is not the optimal structure for them to receive an acceptable return. It is far better for them to leverage their available equity to enter into multiple deals, use some of the cash flow to service the debt and use the remainder to provide a return on the equity investment. Your company has a policy that each transaction will be structured separately, based on the market, the proforma, and the overall transaction cost. In other words, there is no standard structure. Your company has a significant investment pool available, and often partners with other equity partners in hotel investments. This allows the company to invest in more deals than they otherwise could. Your company also maintains relationships with lenders who have participated in the mortgage financing on other of your companies transactions, either by themselves or as a syndicator of a group of lenders. These relationships allow your company considerable flexibility, and the abitlity to rapidly define a deal structure and then secure the debt and equity investors to close the deal quickly. This ability also allows a greater leverage in negotiating a purchase price because sellers know you can finance and close quickly. You are working for a hotel ownership corporation. Your development and feasibility team has identified a resort hotel in Florida that appears to be a great opportunity. The acquisition team has identified three potential capital structures and has sourced these using entities your company has already done business with in other transactions. Your job is to examine the relative risk, and the return to your company for these three capital structures (stacks). Background As we have already learned, the financing structure used in the purchase of a hotel asset is virtually always some combination of debt and equity. A lender will never finance 100% of an asset - in fact they will rarely finance more than 60% of the asset because the hotel industry is classified as fairly high risk. In the event of a forclosure the lender wants to be assured that they could sell the asset and recover their entire debt. On the other side, private equity virtually never finances 100% of a project because it is not the optimal structure for them to receive an acceptable return. It is far better for them to leverage their available equity to enter into multiple deals, use some of the cash flow to service the debt and use the remainder to provide a return on the equity investment. Your company has a policy that each transaction will be structured separately, based on the market, the proforma, and the overall transaction cost. In other words, there is no standard structure. Your company has a significant investment pool available, and often partners with other equity partners in hotel investments. This allows the company to invest in more deals than they otherwise could. Your company also maintains relationships with lenders who have participated in the mortgage financing on other of your companies transactions, either by themselves or as a syndicator of a group of lenders. These relationships allow your company considerable flexibility, and the abitlity to rapidly define a deal structure and then secure the debt and equity investors to close the deal quickly. This ability also allows a greater leverage in negotiating a purchase price because sellers know you can finance and close quickly. You are working for a hotel ownership corporation. Your development and feasibility team has identified a resort hotel in Florida that appears to be a great opportunity. The acquisition team has identified three potential capital structures and has sourced these using entities your company has already done business with in other transactions. Your job is to examine the relative risk, and the return to your company for these three capital structures (stacks). Background As we have already learned, the financing structure used in the purchase of a hotel asset is virtually always some combination of debt and equity. A lender will never finance 100% of an asset - in fact they will rarely finance more than 60% of the asset because the hotel industry is classified as fairly high risk. In the event of a forclosure the lender wants to be assured that they could sell the asset and recover their entire debt. On the other side, private equity virtually never finances 100% of a project because it is not the optimal structure for them to receive an acceptable return. It is far better for them to leverage their available equity to enter into multiple deals, use some of the cash flow to service the debt and use the remainder to provide a return on the equity investment. Your company has a policy that each transaction will be structured separately, based on the market, the proforma, and the overall transaction cost. In other words, there is no standard structure. Your company has a significant investment pool available, and often partners with other equity partners in hotel investments. This allows the company to invest in more deals than they otherwise could. Your company also maintains relationships with lenders who have participated in the mortgage financing on other of your companies transactions, either by themselves or as a syndicator of a group of lenders. These relationships allow your company considerable flexibility, and the abitlity to rapidly define a deal structure and then secure the debt and equity investors to close the deal quickly. This ability also allows a greater leverage in negotiating a purchase price because sellers know you can finance and close quickly. You are working for a hotel ownership corporation. Your development and feasibility team has identified a resort hotel in Florida that appears to be a great opportunity. The acquisition team has identified three potential capital structures and has sourced these using entities your company has already done business with in other transactions. Your job is to examine the relative risk, and the return to your company for these three capital structures (stacks). Background As we have already learned, the financing structure used in the purchase of a hotel asset is virtually always some combination of debt and equity. A lender will never finance 100% of an asset - in fact they will rarely finance more than 60% of the asset because the hotel industry is classified as fairly high risk. In the event of a forclosure the lender wants to be assured that they could sell the asset and recover their entire debt. On the other side, private equity virtually never finances 100% of a project because it is not the optimal structure for them to receive an acceptable return. It is far better for them to leverage their available equity to enter into multiple deals, use some of the cash flow to service the debt and use the remainder to provide a return on the equity investment. Your company has a policy that each transaction will be structured separately, based on the market, the proforma, and the overall transaction cost. In other words, there is no standard structure. Your company has a significant investment pool available, and often partners with other equity partners in hotel investments. This allows the company to invest in more deals than they otherwise could. Your company also maintains relationships with lenders who have participated in the mortgage financing on other of your companies transactions, either by themselves or as a syndicator of a group of lenders. These relationships allow your company considerable flexibility, and the abitlity to rapidly define a deal structure and then secure the debt and equity investors to close the deal quickly. This ability also allows a greater leverage in negotiating a purchase price because sellers know you can finance and close quickly. You are working for a hotel ownership corporation. Your development and feasibility team has identified a resort hotel in Florida that appears to be a great opportunity. The acquisition team has identified three potential capital structures and has sourced these using entities your company has already done business with in other transactions. Your job is to examine the relative risk, and the return to your company for these three capital structures (stacks). Background As we have already learned, the financing structure used in the purchase of a hotel asset is virtually always some combination of debt and equity. A lender will never finance 100% of an asset - in fact they will rarely finance more than 60% of the asset because the hotel industry is classified as fairly high risk. In the event of a forclosure the lender wants to be assured that they could sell the asset and recover their entire debt. On the other side, private equity virtually never finances 100% of a project because it is not the optimal structure for them to receive an acceptable return. It is far better for them to leverage their available equity to enter into multiple deals, use some of the cash flow to service the debt and use the remainder to provide a return on the equity investment. Your company has a policy that each transaction will be structured separately, based on the market, the proforma, and the overall transaction cost. In other words, there is no standard structure. Your company has a significant investment pool available, and often partners with other equity partners in hotel investments. This allows the company to invest in more deals than they otherwise could. Your company also maintains relationships with lenders who have participated in the mortgage financing on other of your companies transactions, either by themselves or as a syndicator of a group of lenders. These relationships allow your company considerable flexibility, and the abitlity to rapidly define a deal structure and then secure the debt and equity investors to close the deal quickly. This ability also allows a greater leverage in negotiating a purchase price because sellers know you can finance and close quickly. You are working for a hotel ownership corporation. Your development and feasibility team has identified a resort hotel in Florida that appears to be a great opportunity. The acquisition team has identified three potential capital structures and has sourced these using entities your company has already done business with in other transactions. Your job is to examine the relative risk, and the return to your company for these three capital structures (stacks). Background As we have already learned, the financing structure used in the purchase of a hotel asset is virtually always some combination of debt and equity. A lender will never finance 100% of an asset - in fact they will rarely finance more than 60% of the asset because the hotel industry is classified as fairly high risk. In the event of a forclosure the lender wants to be assured that they could sell the asset and recover their entire debt. On the other side, private equity virtually never finances 100% of a project because it is not the optimal structure for them to receive an acceptable return. It is far better for them to leverage their available equity to enter into multiple deals, use some of the cash flow to service the debt and use the remainder to provide a return on the equity investment. Your company has a policy that each transaction will be structured separately, based on the market, the proforma, and the overall transaction cost. In other words, there is no standard structure. Your company has a significant investment pool available, and often partners with other equity partners in hotel investments. This allows the company to invest in more deals than they otherwise could. Your company also maintains relationships with lenders who have participated in the mortgage financing on other of your companies transactions, either by themselves or as a syndicator of a group of lenders. These relationships allow your company considerable flexibility, and the abitlity to rapidly define a deal structure and then secure the debt and equity investors to close the deal quickly. This ability also allows a greater leverage in negotiating a purchase price because sellers know you can finance and close quickly.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
Based on the information provided its clear that the financing structure for the resort hotel acquis... View the full answer
Related Book For
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these accounting questions
-
Prove the Gauss divergence theorem for the given vector fields and volumes (a) vec(4) = xvec(e)x + yvec(e),, + zvec(e) ,V:{(x, y, z)|x + y + z < 1,y < 0, z < 0} (b) vec(A) = psinovec(e) + pcosovec(e)...
-
Managing Scope Changes Case Study Scope changes on a project can occur regardless of how well the project is planned or executed. Scope changes can be the result of something that was omitted during...
-
Planning is one of the most important management functions in any business. A front office managers first step in planning should involve determine the departments goals. Planning also includes...
-
For the Somerset furniture Company described in Case Problem 10.1 in Chapter 10, determine the product lead time by developing a time line from the initiation of a purchase order to product delivery....
-
Solve. Round percents to the nearest tenth, if necessary. 1. In 2010, approximately 493 thousand correctional officers were employed in the United States. By 2020, this number is expected to increase...
-
Lei Company accumulates the following adjustment data at December 31. 1. Services performed but not recorded total $1,000. 2. Supplies of $300 have been used. 3. Utility expenses of $225 are unpaid....
-
Consider the stepped bar shown in Fig. 12.11 with the following data: \(A_{1}=25 \times 10^{-4} \mathrm{~m}^{2}\), \(A_{2}=16 \times 10^{-4} \mathrm{~m}^{2}, A_{3}=9 \times 10^{-4} \mathrm{~m}^{2},...
-
Davis Corporation was authorized to issue 100,000 shares of $10 par common stock and 50,000 shares of $50 par, 6 percent, cumulative preferred stock. Davis Corporation completed the following...
-
You receive a call from Lydia Asoma of Acme. She says she is the HR Manager at Acme and wants you to act for her as her solicitor to defend allegations being made against her by Acme concerning the...
-
The trial balance for Sharmar for the period ended 31.03.03 before making year-end adjustments is as follows: The following matters have not been taken into account when preparing the above trial...
-
ABC Ltd have just purchased a new building to expand their factory capacity. What would be the measurement rule that they would need to use to record this purchase in their accounts initially?
-
A, B, and C are three similar plants under the same management who wants to merge them for better operation. The details are as under: You have to find out: (i) the capacity of the merged plant for...
-
Small Ltd. has been offered a choice to buy one out of two machines, A and B. You are required to compute: (a) Break-even point for each of the machines. (b) The level of sales at which both machines...
-
ABC Company Ltd. expects the following sales by months in units for the first six months of next year. The company has a policy of maintaining an inventory equal to budgeted sales for the following...
-
The Royal Industries Ltd. has prepared its annual sales forecast, expecting to achieve sales of 30,00,000 next year. The controller is uncertain about the pattern of sales to be expected by month and...
-
For the DOS, we are interested in how MS and gender are related with the depression outcome. Based on the logistic model: Dep \(\sim\) MS | Gender (MS, Gender, and their interaction), answer the...
-
Write short notes on: (i) Noting Charges. (ii) Objective of Accounting Standards. (iii) Retirement of bills of exchange. (iv) Over-riding Commission.
-
Write a paper by answer the following question: Should Recycling Be Mandatory?
-
Actuaries of the World (AW), a not-for-profit organization whose objective is to provide actuarial services to developing countries, was organized early in 2013 by a group of Canadian actuaries. They...
-
You are the provincial controller responsible for preparing the government's financial statements. You are aware that at an election rally, a member of the legislature promised that if elected, the...
-
Investco Ltd. is a Canadian real estate and property developer that decided to hold a parcel of land in downtown Munich, Germany, for speculative purposes. The land, costing 12 million, was financed...
-
Describe the steps in management decision making. What are the difficulties in making management decisions?
-
What are the four functions of management? How are they related to the work process?
-
Discuss the three general roles of management. What are the purposes of these roles? What specific roles fall under each general role?
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App