Suppose one writes a logic program that carries out a resolution inference step. That is, let Resolve (c1, c2, c) succeed if c is the result of resolving cl and c2. Normally Resolve would be used as part of a theorem prover by calling it with c1 and c2 instantiated to particular clauses, thereby generating the re-solvent c. Now suppose instead that we call it with un-instantiated and c1 and c2 un-instantiated. Will this succeed in generating the appropriate results of an inverse resolution step? Would you need any special modifications to the logic programming system for this to work?
Answer to relevant QuestionsSuppose that FOIL is considering adding a literal to a clause using a binary predicate P and those previous literals (including the head of the clause) contain five different variables.a. How many functionally different ...Explain how to apply the boosting method naive Bayes learning. Test the performance of the resulting algorithm on the restaurant learning problem.Construct a support vector machine that computes the XOR function. It will be convenient to use values of 1 and —1 instead of I and 0 for the inputs and for the outputs. So an example looks like ([—1. ii, 1) or ([—1, ...The network in Figure has four hidden nodes. This number was chosen somewhat arbitrarily. Run systematic experiments to measure the learning curves for networks with different numbers of hidden nodes. What is the optimal ...Compute the true utility function and the best linear approximation in x and y (as in Equation (21.9)) for the following environments:a. A l0 x 10 world with a single +1 terminal state at (10, 10).b. As in (a), but add a ...
Post your question