# Question: Suppose stock returns can be explained by the following three factor

Suppose stock returns can be explained by the following three-factor model:

Rt = RF + β1F1 + β2F2 – β3F3

Assume there is no firm-specific risk. The information for each stock is presented here:

The risk premiums for the factors are 6.1 percent, 5.3 percent, and 5.7 percent, respectively. If you create a portfolio with 20 percent invested in Stock A, 20 percent invested in Stock B, and the remainder in Stock C, what is the expression for the return on your portfolio? If the risk-free rate is 3.2 percent, what is the expected return on yourportfolio?

Rt = RF + β1F1 + β2F2 – β3F3

Assume there is no firm-specific risk. The information for each stock is presented here:

The risk premiums for the factors are 6.1 percent, 5.3 percent, and 5.7 percent, respectively. If you create a portfolio with 20 percent invested in Stock A, 20 percent invested in Stock B, and the remainder in Stock C, what is the expression for the return on your portfolio? If the risk-free rate is 3.2 percent, what is the expected return on yourportfolio?

## Relevant Questions

Suppose stock returns can be explained by a two-factor model. The firm-specific risks for all stocks are independent. The following table shows the information for two diversified portfolios: If the risk-free rate is 4 ...Assume that the returns on individual securities are generated by the following two-factor model: Rit = E (Rit) + b βij F1t + βt2 F2tHere: Rit is the return on Security i at Time t. F1t and F2t are market factors with zero ...Filer manufacturing has 8.3 million shares of common stock outstanding. The current share price is $53 and the book value per share is $4. Filer manufacturing also has two bond issues outstanding. The first bond issue has a ...Floyd Industries stock has a beta of 1.3. The company just paid a dividend of $.95, and the dividends are expected to grow at 4.5 percent per year. The expected return on the market is 11 percent, and Treasury bills are ...In the middle to late 1990s, the performance of the pros was unusually poor—on the order of 90 percent of all equity mutual funds underperformed a passively managed index fund. How does this bear on the issue of market ...Post your question