Question: Suppose that insurance policies were fully tax exempt but a
Suppose that insurance policies were fully tax exempt but (a) policies pay less than the fully taxable bond return to cover the costs of the insurance company and (b) loans can be secured only at a higher rate than the fully taxable bond rate to cover the lenders’ costs. Can we use an insurance policy strategy to eliminate the tax on the $ 100,000 of taxable income? What is the implicit tax rate on this strategy? How does it arise and where does it go? Would every taxpayer want to use this strategy?
Answer to relevant QuestionsAssume you are a tax planner for a client with the following concerns. a. Suppose there exist three riskless assets. The first yields a fully taxable return of 7% before tax; the second yields a pretax return of 6%, only ...Assume you work for a local municipality. Further assume that there are no tax rule restrictions preventing a municipality from buying taxable bonds financed by tax exempt bonds yielding a lower before tax rate of return. ...What are the tax benefits of deferring income recognition in advance of a decline in statutory tax rates? What, if any, are the nontax costs? What role do hidden action problems play in limited partnerships and other joint ventures? How might the cost of these problems be reduced? A tax planner for a start up biotechnology company is advising her client about how to efficiently organize R& D activities. One suggestion the tax planner made is to form a joint venture with another biotech company. List ...
Post your question