Suppose that the U.S. personal income tax system became a “flat tax” system, in which all taxpayers paid a certain percentage of their incomes in tax, and in which there are no exemptions or deductions. In which way(s) could this flat tax be more regressive than the present U.S. system? In which ways could it be more progressive than the present system?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhy should casualty losses or large medical expenditures be fully tax-deductible only under certain circumstances? Your roommate and you had identical high school grade point averages and SAT scores. In many respects, one would expect that you would be equally successful. But because you chose economics as a major and your roommate chose ...The largest tax break for most Americans is the mortgage interest tax deduction, which allows home owners to deduct from their taxable income the amount of money they pay in interest to finance their homes. This tax break is ...Why can some taxes that appear to be regressive in terms of current income be thought of as progressive from a lifetime tax incidence perspective? The government of Washlovia wants to impose a tax on clothes dryers. In East Washlovia the demand elasticity for clothes dryers is –2.4 while in West Washlovia the demand elasticity is –1.7. Where will the tax ...
Post your question