# Question

Suppose you are given a bag containing n unbiased coins. You are told that n — 1 of these coins are normal, with heads on one side arid tails on the other, whereas one coin is a fake, with heads on both sides.

a. Suppose you reach into the bag, pick out a coin uniformly at random, flip it, and get a head. What is the (conditional) probability that the coin you chose is the fake coin?

b. Suppose you continue flipping the coin for a total of k times after picking it and see k heads. Now what is the conditional probability that you picked the fake coin?

c. Suppose you wanted to decide whether the chosen coin was fake by flipping it k times. The decision procedure returns FAKE if all k flips come up heads, otherwise it returns NORMAL. What is the (unconditional) probability that this procedure makes an error?

a. Suppose you reach into the bag, pick out a coin uniformly at random, flip it, and get a head. What is the (conditional) probability that the coin you chose is the fake coin?

b. Suppose you continue flipping the coin for a total of k times after picking it and see k heads. Now what is the conditional probability that you picked the fake coin?

c. Suppose you wanted to decide whether the chosen coin was fake by flipping it k times. The decision procedure returns FAKE if all k flips come up heads, otherwise it returns NORMAL. What is the (unconditional) probability that this procedure makes an error?

## Answer to relevant Questions

In this exercise, you will complete the normalization calculation for the meningitis example. First, make up a suitable value for P(S —M), and use it to calculate un-normalized values for P (M│S) and P ...Write out a general algorithm for answering queries of the form P (Cause│e), using a naive Bayes distribution. You should assume that the evidence e may assign values to any subset of the effect variables.The probit distribution defined, describes the probability distribution for a Boolean child, given a single continuous parent.a. How might the definition be extended to cover multiple continuous parents?b. How might it be ...Show that any second-order Markov process can be rewritten as a first-order Markov process with an augmented set of state variables. Can this always he done parsimoniously that is, without increasing the number of parameters ...The model of “tomato” in Figure allows for a coarticulation on the first vowel by giving two possible phones. An alternative approach is to use a tri-phone model in which the [ow (t, m)] phone automatically includes the ...Post your question

0