Suppose you wanted to conduct an econometric study of the impact of Head Start attendance on future earnings. You decide to define your treatment group as those children who attended Head Start and your control group as those with similar family backgrounds who did not attend Head Start. Why might such an analysis provide misleading results? What would be a more credible way of estimating the impact?
Answer to relevant QuestionsA commentator recently suggested the following welfare reform: “Scrap the failing welfare programs. . . . Ensure that everyone has a basic income. Then simplify the tax code to restore the incentives . . . for everyone to ...Consider Eleanor, who qualifies for the earned income tax credit as depicted in Figure 13.8. Suppose that Eleanor can earn $ 8 per hour. Taking into account the EITC and ignoring other aspects of the tax and transfer ...In an effort to reduce alcohol consumption, the government is considering a $ 1 tax on each gallon of liquor sold (the tax is levied on producers). Suppose that the demand curve is QD = 500,000 - 20,000 P (where QD is the ...Suppose that your neighbor is willing to pay you $ 100 to do some home repairs for her. You would be willing to do the job for $ 80, so you strike a deal. Now suppose that the government levies • Taxes generally impose an ...Under the US tax system, capital that is employed in the corporate sector is taxed at a higher rate than capital in the noncorporate sector. This problem will analyze the excess burden of the differential taxation of ...
Post your question