The City of Newland through its financial director entered into a contract with Armae, a waste management contractor, to haul away all the city’s waste products for a certain price. After the contract was made, several new rental units were built in the city, and Armae, based on his higher costs, asked the city for an additional $ 20,000 dollars a year. At a public meeting, all city council members voluntarily voted to authorize the mayor to pay Armae the additional amount. Several community citizens who attended the meeting then sued the city, claiming that the additional compensation should have been denied. They based their claim on the theory that a contract was already in place and that there was no consideration for the payment of the increased compensation. Were the contract modification and additional $ 20,000 per year to Armae valid?
Answer to relevant QuestionsThe board of directors of Hill Haven, a home for the elderly, was accepting donations to build an additional dormitory at the home. Hogan promised in writing to donate $ 3,000 for the proposed addition. Relying on this and ...Williamson was about to lose a house that she owned but was mortgaged. She agreed to sell the house to Matthews for an amount she thought would pay off the mortgage and leave enough money for her to purchase a mobile home. ...Williamson, an alcoholic who was threatened with foreclosure on her house, entered into a contract to sell it for $ 17,000. Smith, an attorney who had read about the foreclosure in the newspaper and who knew about ...What are covenants not to compete? What is the standard used to judge their legality? Singletary, as owner of a multistory building, leased the first floor to Topp Copy Products. A toilet in an apartment above Topp Copy Products developed a leak and did substantial damage to Topp Copy’s inventory in the ...
Post your question