The commonwealth of Massachusetts recently ran an advertising campaign for testate lottery that claimed, “Even when you lose, you win.” The gist of the advertisement was that lottery revenue was used for particularly good ends like education. Suppose that lottery revenues are indeed earmarked for education. How would traditional economic theory evaluate the claim behind the ad campaign? How would an economist who believed in the flypaper effect evaluate it?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhy does California’s school finance equalization policy have a high associated marginal tax price? Explain. There are two types of residents in Brookline and Boston, professors and students. Professors have an income of Y = 200; students have an income of Y = 100. Both Brookline and Boston provide road repair services for their ...What are the advantages of comparing twins to investigate the relationship between education and earnings? What are the drawbacks of doing so? One way to structure a student loan repayment plan is to make it income-contingent—that is, to relate the amount that a student would have to repay in any given month to how much income he or she earns. How might the ...Currently, in order to receive workers’ compensation, a claimant’s injury claims must be verified by a physician of the claimant’s choosing. Suppose that the workers’ compensation policy changed so that only ...
Post your question