The EEOC notified North American Stainless (NAS) in February 2003 that Miriam Regalado had filed a charge
Question:
The employer contended that because Thompson did not “engag[e] in any statutorily protected activity, either on his own behalf or on behalf of Miriam Regalado,” he is not included in the class of persons for whom Congress created a retaliation cause of action. Thompson argued that the Supreme Court adopted a broad standard in its Burlington decision because Title VII’s antiretaliation provision is worded broadly, and that there is no textual basis for making an exception to it for third-party reprisals. Decide. [Thompson v. North American Stainless Steel, LP, 131 S.Ct. 863]
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Andersons Business Law and the Legal Environment
ISBN: 978-1133587583
22nd edition
Authors: David P. Twomey, Marianne M. Jennings
Question Posted: