The foreman in a small assembly plant wants to see whether a training program has reduced the number of worker errors. The foreman records the weekly number of errors for a random sample of workers before the training, and again after the training. Is there sufficient evidence, at the 4% significance level, to suggest that the training led to a reduced number of worker errors?
Answer to relevant QuestionsA small company that specializes in gourmet cookies decides to redesign its packaging. The company owner is certain that the new package will lead to increased sales. Weekly sales at a random sample of stores in the Barrie ...A restaurant owner wanted to gather some data on customer taste preferences about two new salads on the menu, one a mixed-greens salad, and one a roasted vegetable salad. A random sample of diners was selected, and each ...A dairy products company is developing a new organic yogurt. The company assembles a panel of tasters to compare two possible formulations of the new product. The panel lists are asked to rate the taste of each yogurt on a ...A software company has designed a new version of its search engine, and wants to investigate consumer response. A randomly selected group of users of the old search engine is selected, and given training with the new version ...A restaurant asked a random sample of its weeknight customers to rate their food on the following scale: 1––excellent, 2––good, 3––fair, 4––poor, 5––awful. Another random sample of weekend diners was ...
Post your question