# Question: The Hit and Miss Manufacturing Company produces items that have a probability

The Hit-and-Miss Manufacturing Company produces items that have a probability p of being defective. These items are produced in lots of 150. Past experience indicates that p for an entire lot is either 0.05 or 0.25. Furthermore, in 80 percent of the lots produced, p equals 0.05 (so p equals 0.25 in 20 percent of the lots). These items are then used in an assembly, and ultimately their quality is determined before the final assembly leaves the plant. Initially the company can either screen each item in a lot at a cost of $10 per item and replace defective items or use the items directly without screening. If the latter action is chosen, the cost of rework is ultimately $100 per defective item. Because screening requires scheduling of inspectors and equipment, the decision to screen or not screen must be made 2 days before the screening is to take place. However, one item can be taken from the lot and sent to a laboratory for inspection, and its quality (defective or nondefective) can be reported before the screen/no screen decision must be made. The cost of this initial inspection is $125.

(a) Develop a decision analysis formulation of this problem by identifying the decision alternatives, the states of nature, and the payoff table if the single item is not inspected in advance.

(b) Assuming the single item is not inspected in advance, use Bayesâ€™ decision rule to determine which decision alternative should be chosen.

(c) Find EVPI. Does this answer indicate that consideration should be given to inspecting the single item in advance?

(d) Assume now that the single item is inspected in advance. Find the posterior probabilities of the respective states of nature for each of the two possible outcomes of this inspection.

(e) Find EVE. Is inspecting the single item worthwhile?

(f) Determine the optimal policy.

(a) Develop a decision analysis formulation of this problem by identifying the decision alternatives, the states of nature, and the payoff table if the single item is not inspected in advance.

(b) Assuming the single item is not inspected in advance, use Bayesâ€™ decision rule to determine which decision alternative should be chosen.

(c) Find EVPI. Does this answer indicate that consideration should be given to inspecting the single item in advance?

(d) Assume now that the single item is inspected in advance. Find the posterior probabilities of the respective states of nature for each of the two possible outcomes of this inspection.

(e) Find EVE. Is inspecting the single item worthwhile?

(f) Determine the optimal policy.

## Answer to relevant Questions

Consider two weighted coins. Coin 1 has a probability of 0.3 of turning up heads, and coin 2 has a probability of 0.6 of turning up heads. A coin is tossed once; the probability that coin 1 is tossed is 0.6, and the ...Betsy Pitzer makes decisions according to Bayesâ€™ decision rule. For her current problem, Betsy has constructed the following payoff table (in units of dollars): (a) Which alternative should Betsy choose? (b) Find EVPI. (c) ...Reconsider Prob.16.3-2. The management of Silicon Dynamics now wants to see a decision tree displaying the entire problem. Construct and solve this decision tree by hand. Use the scenario given in Prob.16.3-12. (a) Draw and properly label the decision tree. Include all the payoffs but not the probabilities. (b) Find the probabilities for the branches emanating from the event nodes. (c) Apply ...Warren Buffy is an enormously wealthy investor who has built his fortune through his legendary investing acumen. He currently has been offered three major investments and he would like to choose one. The first one is a ...Post your question